Opentopia Directory Encyclopedia Tools

AdBusters

Encyclopedia : A : AD : ADB : AdBusters



 

Anti-consumerism
Related Social movements
Anarchist movement
Anti-globalisation movement
Environmental movement
Situationism · Postmodernism

Ideas and theory
Society of the Spectacle
Culture jamming
Corporate crime
Media bias
Alternative culture
Affluenza · Simple living
Cultural Creatives
Commodity fetishism
Cultural hegemony
Conspicuous consumption
Ethical consumerism

Popular Works
No Logo · The Corporation
The Theory of the Leisure Class


People and Organizations
AdBusters
Ralph Nader · Green party
Noam Chomsky
Ron English
Naomi Klein
Thorstein Veblen
Guy Debord
Michael Moore
Michel Foucault
The Yes Men


Related subjects
Advertising
Capitalism · Left wing politics
Sweatshops


Relevant lists
List of Anti-consumerists
List of social movements
[edit this box]
Adbusters is a political magazine, founded by Kalle Lasn and Bill Schmalz that is published in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada by the Media Foundation. It is an activist magazine, devoted to numerous political and social causes, many of which are anti-consumerism or anti-capitalist in nature. The Adbusters Media Foundation is a 120,000-circulation magazine, the founder of Buy Nothing Day, and one of the sponsors of TV-Turnoff Week. Adbusters is not-for-profit, and is reader-supported.

Adbusters has affiliation with sister organisations such as L'association Résistance à l'Aggression Publicitaire in France, Adbusters Norge in Norway, Adbusters Sverige in Sweden and Culture Jammers in Japan.

Mandate

The Adbusters mission statement:
We are a global network of artists, activists, writers, pranksters, students, educators and entrepreneurs who want to advance the new social activist movement of the information age. Our aim is to topple existing power structures and forge a major shift in the way we will live in the 21st century.
Adbusters is at essence an ecological magazine, examining the relationship between people and the environment, both the material environment and the mental environment."[About Adbusters]". Adbusters.org. Retrieved September 7 2005.
Adbusters makes commentary on the social trends in developed nations, and their primary aim is to reduce the influence and prevalence of advertising and consumerism.

We will change the way information flows, the way institutions wield powers, the way the food, fashion, car and culture industries set their agendas. Above all, we will change the way we interact with the mass media and we will reclaim the way in which meaning is produced in society. AdBusters Issue #25. May/June 2005.
Adbusters' intellectual position parallels that of the situationists, being concerned with "living by proxy". It can also be compared with Marxism, due to ideas of a placated public and revolution, and Freudianism due to thoughts about modern man being unsatisfied and out-of-place in current society. It describes principals of egalitarianism, and its political position seems close to that of socialism.

The mission of the Adbusters Media Foundation can also be identified with organizations such as Indymedia, Downhill Battle and [CNUK]. It also holds some common beliefs with Creative Commons Free Culture, No Logo, Green Peace and even PETA.

Issues

Blackspot campaign

In 2004, the organization began selling shoes with their black spot "anti-logo". The project is an experiment in "anti-capitalism": Each shoe comes with a share of stock in the company, allowing owners to vote on the website on new ventures and what to do with profits. The blackspot campaign has spawned other ideas, like blackspot music, or blackspot soda, which aim to compete in the marketplace with the large corporations they oppose. The most popular product in the blackspot campaign is the [blackspot shoes]. The shoes are made primarily from organic hemp and recycled car tires, and are made in Portugal by union labor.

Media Carta

New York City billboard
Enlarge
New York City billboard

On September 13, 2004, Adbusters filed a lawsuit against six major Canadian television broadcasters (including CanWest Global, Bell Globemedia, CHUM Ltd., and the CBC) for refusing to air Adbusters videos in the television commercial spots that Adbusters attempted to purchase. Most broadcasters refused the commercials for reasons based on business principles. The lawsuit claims that Adbusters' freedom of expression was unjustly limited by the refusals. There has been talk that if Adbusters wins in Canadian court, they will file similar lawsuits against major U.S. broadcasters that also refused the advertisements.

It is, however, unlikely that they will be successful, as both the Canadian and American Constitutions only restrict the government from infringing upon freedom of speech, not private individuals and groups.

True cost economics

Adbusters traces many of the problems which exist in developed nations to the neo-classical economic system, which Adbusters believes leaves no room for morality. Adbusters supports the idea of [true cost economics], which incorporates the environmental and human consequences of a product into its economic model. True cost economics involves taxing products that are perceived as being especially harmful to the environment or human welfare. In a culture which practices typical consumerism, consumers may be shielded from the costs of externalities such as trans-oceanic shipping, long-term environmental impact, or the lack of a living wage for the employees involved in creating the products. True Cost Economics taxes products in an attempt to accurately reflect all the hidden costs involved.

Mental space

Adbusters opposes the unrestrained expansion of commerce into private life. Ad-creep is the concept that advertising is pushing ethical boundaries, and that many commercial activities are an opponent to mental wellbeing. Adbusters argues that the heavy advertising present in many cultures plays a large psychological role. Adbusters criticizes what they perceive as false values present in the commercial market, and a false sense of personal empowerment offered by it. The false demand created for commercial products is believed to get in the way of having a healthy mental state, and living a meaningful life.

Adbusters groups their opposition to the hype, spin and misinformation which the magazine feels is common in mass media with the fight for mental space, believing that the mental environment is subject to the tragedy of the commons.

On numerous occasions, Adbusters has made reference to an iminent apocalypse created by scientific technology. [link] [link] [link] Adbusters feels human society is in decline, and without change, there is "no future". A common theme in Adbusters magazines is defining a relationship between the advance of technology and unhappiness. There is also concern about the potential health and environmental dangers of emerging technologies. The main criticisms which adbusters has of modern science is that it is:
  • Developing at an unsafe rate [link]
  • Proceeding in a direction that is harmful, [link]
  • Proceeding in a direction that is for capitalist ends. [link] [link]
Adbusters is opposed to genetically modified food and related projects of agribusiness , holding the practice as being damaging to physical and mental health. Adbusters opposes genetic engineering and the copyright of living organisms. A common ideal for food production is often illustrated as one that would mirror historic agriculture.

Another of Adbuster's concerns is the widespread use of psychoactive medication. The Adbusters foundation takes a hard stand on psychoactive drugs, arguing that the pharmaceutical industry is not concerned with patient health, the government approves unsafe drugs, doctors are too eager to prescribe drugs, and patients are over-willing to medicate out of conformity. [link]

War

Adbusters' position on war ties in to their position on commercialism and overconsumption. A great deal of attention is paid to the 2003 Invasion of Iraq, and an entire issue was focused on the question of the necessity of war, [link] and another issue was focused on the history of American combat.[link] The magazine repeatedly asserts that there is a connection between terrorism and American foreign policy, which they feel is flawed. Further, Adbusters asserts that there is a connection between the foreign policy of a nation, and the lifestyle of its citizens. While Adbusters rails against these perceived economic conditions that lead to war, the magazine also accuses many leading officials of immorality. In issue [#63], Adbusters describes Vladimir Putin, Ariel Sharon, and George W. Bush as terrorists, and describes American ideology as fascist.

Culture jamming

Adbusters has been described as "the flagship publication of the culture jamming movement".Heath, Joseph and Potter, Andrew. The Rebel Sell. Harper Perennial, 2004. Adbusters is particularly well-known for their culture jamming campaigns, and the magazine often features photographs of politically-motivated billboard or advertisement vandalism sent in by readers. Culture jamming is seen as public demonstration of the consequences of over-consumerism. It takes the form of clever billboard modifications, google bombing, flash mobs and fake parking tickets for SUVs. The aim of culture jamming is to create a large contrast between the corporate image and the real consequences of corporate behaviour. It is a form of protest, so the culture jammer aims to be as public as possible. Adbusters calls it "trickle up" activism, and encourages its readers to do these activities, and honours culture jamming work in the magazine.

Criticisms

Adbusters has been criticized for having a style and form that are similar to the media and commercial product which it attacks.McLaren, Carrie. "[Culture Jamming (tm): Brought To You By Adbusters]". Stay Free!. Retrieved September 13 2005. This is particularly true in the case of its Blackspot Shoe campaign, about which it has been said that their existence proves that "no rational person could possibly believe that there is any tension between 'mainstream' and 'alternative' culture."

Heath and Potter's The Rebel Sell claims that the more alternative or subversive Adbusters feels, the more appealing it will become to the mainstream market. Consumers seek exclusivity and social distinction, which is in contrast to Adbusters' description of the mainstream consumer as a mindless conformist. It is argued that the mainstream market seeks the very same brand of individuality that Adbusters promotes; repression is not a target of the market, thus the Adbusters doctrine is "the true spirit of capitalism."

It has also been heavily criticized for running an article [''Why won't anyone say they are Jewish? ] by Kalle Lasn, AdBusters, March/April 2004 that identified many of the leading neoconservatives as Jewish and questioned why this fact and its potential implications for US Middle East policy was not open to discussion.Raynes-Goldie, Kate. "[Race Baiting: AdBusters' Listing of Jewish Neo-cons The Latest Wacko Twist in Lefty Mag's Remake]". Now Toronto. March 24 2004. This topic was also recently brought up by political scientistics John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt to great controversy -- see AIPAC: Mearsheimer & Walt paper''.

Further, an article printed several years ago concerning Cuba's relationship to American culture was criticized for taking a particularly socialist slant on the issue, and failing to comment upon the many threats to civil liberty that citizens in communist countries regularly face.

Adbusters often prints critical mail that it receives from its readers in each issue.

See also

  • Guy Debord – philosopher quoted by Adbusters - "Live without dead time"

References

External links

 


From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Original article here. Support Wikipedia by contributing or donating.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License See Wikipedia Copyrights for details.


Search Titles
0123456789
ABCDEFGHIJ
KLMNOPQRST
UVWXYZ?

E-mail this article to:

Personal Message: