About Opentopia
Opentopia Directory Encyclopedia Tools

Advocacy journalism

Encyclopedia : A : AD : ADV : Advocacy journalism

Topics in Journalism[.]
Professional concepts
Ethics & News values
Objectivity & Attribution
News source
News & Investigation
Reporting & Writing
Business & Citizen
Alternative & Advocacy
Science journalism
Other Topics & Books
Outside influence
Infotainment & Celebrity
Infotainers & Personalities
Distorted news & VNRs
Yellow journalism
Public relations
Propaganda model
News media
Newspapers & Magazines
Agencies
Broadcasting
Online & Blogging
Alternative media
Roles
Journalists, Reporters, Editors, Anchors, Photojournalists,

Advocacy journalism is a genre of journalism that is strongly fact-based, but may seek to support a point-of-view in some public or private sector issue. It is particularly common in Europe. Corporate crime, government criticism, corruption and social issues are frequent topics of interest. In this way, advocacy journalists serve the public interest in a similar way to muckrakers. Advocacy journalism criticize the objectivity ideal of mainstream press as an ideological dissimulation of class bias, and underline the fact that political censorship can easily be and is often replaced by economical censorship.

A hypothetical example of advocacy journalism

* In Anytown, USA, there is public conflict regarding opposition and support for building a large power plant. A local print or electronic media outlet opposed to the plant presents a five part series strongly accenting negative consequences the power plant has for the town. The news outlet reports on the criminal activity of the builder, conflicts of interest between the builder and local politicians, and negative environmental impacts. It gives coverage to local demonstrations and town meetings. The news media outlet presents facts in a compelling, well-researched manner.
Traditionally, advocacy and criticism are restricted to editorial and op-ed pages: a fire-wall exists between the editorial section and the newsroom. The Wall Street Journal, for example, has a policy of strict separation between the news desk and the editorial board; most major print and electronic news outlets do as well. However, advocacy journalism describes journalism that crosses the line, in which one may observe subtle or obvious editorializing in reports. Even a television news presenter's facial expression, or a radio broadcaster's tone of voice, or other nuance, is interpreted as lending an opinion to what is being reported.

Advocacy journalism is often practiced by a broad range of alternative media and special interest publications and programs. Many of these media outlets have clearly defined political and editorial positions. The genre may apply to a single article in a publication, such as political stories in Rolling Stone; there are also "advocacy journals", or "alternative publications", which are marketed to target groups based on their interests or biases, for example:

Contents

Advocacy journalism and U.S. media bias

Related articles: Journalism ethics and standards, Media bias, Public relations
In the United States, Advocacy journalism is part of the nomenclature of questions related to debate over systemic media bias in domestic media. Investigative reporter Greg Palast has said there is "an electronic Berlin Wall that surrounds the United States," with regard to certain political stories, such as the U.S. Presidential election of 2000. In 2005, the board of PBS debated Advocacy journalism with regard to its programs, and subsequently reduced time and funding for the program Now with Bill Moyers, and expanded a show hosted by Tucker Carlson.

In the U.S., complex national and global issues are often covered with the use of simple, key terms (examples: War on Terrorism, Terri Schiavo, Liberals, Conservatives, Neo-Cons, Weapons of mass destruction, Plame affair, Iran-Contra Affair, Watergate). In these situations, reports are labeled "Advocacy journalism" by their subjects with the intent to dismiss the news report, attempting to relegate it to a dismissable report using an ad hominem argument. In other words, journalists and the public may observe a key figure dismiss a report as "advocacy journalism to cast doubt on the integrity of the reporter or the news media outlet it came from.

In some instances a publication or journalist specifically advocates a particular political figure as part of the staff of a publication, such as Judith Miller's advocacy of the president's position that Iraq had Weapons of mass destruction. There are also paid-for propaganda campaigns, such as Armstrong Williams': he was paid to support the No Child Left Behind education plan of President Bush.

The U.S. government has also made use of video news releases in covert domestic propaganda campaigns. In 2004 and 2005, Jeff Gannon was given access to the whitehouse press corps with the intent that he ask questions crafted to assist the whitehouse spokesperson, Scott McClellan, and the president, to give favorable answers which were understood to be the answer to be used by media outlets advocating the Whitehouse's overall public relations plan. These are examples of a highly unethical form of "advocacy journalism" trying to pass itself off as objective news.

Perspectives from advocacy journalists

One writer for the "alternative" journalism collaborative, the Independent Media Center, writes the following in a call to action:

Classic tenets of journalism call for objectivity and neutrality. These are antiquated principles no longer universally observed.... We must absolutely not feel bound by them. If we are ever to create meaningful change, advocacy journalism will be the single most crucial element to enable the necessary organizing. It is therefore very important that we learn how to be successful advocacy journalists. For many, this will require a different way of identifying and pursuing goals.1



In an April 2000 address to the Canadian Association of Journalists, Sue Careless gave the following commentary and advice to advocacy journalists, which seeks to establish a common view of what journalistic standards the genre should follow.2

Sue Careless also criticized the mainstream media for unbalanced and politically biased coverage, for economic conflicts of interest, and for neglecting certain public causes.  She said that alternative publications have advantages in independence, focus, and access, which make them more effective public-interest advocates than the mainstream media.



History





The Crisis, the official magazine of the NAACP, was founded in 1910.  It describes itself as inheriting the tradition of advocacy journalism from Freedom's Journal, [link], which began in 1827 as "the first African-American owned and operated newspaper published in the United States."[link]


Muckrakers are often claimed as the professional ancestors of modern advocacy journalists; for example: Nellie Bly, Ida M. Tarbell, Lincoln Steffens, Upton Sinclair, George Seldes, and I.F. Stone.


French newspapers Libération, Charlie Hebdo, Le Canard Enchaîné and L'Humanité all recuse what they consider pseudo-objective journalism for a purposeful explicited political stance on events. They oppose Le Monde neutral style, which doesn't impede it, according to those critics, from dissimulating various events or from abstaining to speak about certain subjects. On the other side, a newspaper like Le Figaro clearly assumes its conservative stance and pool of readers.



Objectivity



Further information: Objectivity (journalism) and Objectivity (philosophy)



Advocacy journalists may reject the principle of objectivity in their work for several different reasons.


Many believe that there is no such thing as objective reporting, that there will always be some form of implicit bias, whether political, personal, or metaphysical, whether intentional or subconscious.  This is not necessarily a rejection of the existence of an objective reality, merely a statement about our inability to report on it in a value-free fashion.  This may sound like a radical idea, but many mainstream journalists accept the philosophical idea that pure "objectivity" is impossible, but still seek to minimize bias in their work. Other journalistic standards, such as balance, and neutrality, may be used to describe a more practical kind of "objectivity".  


"Alternative" critics often charge that the mainstream's media claims of being "bias free" are harmful because they paper over inevitable (often subconscious) biases. They also argue that media sources claiming to be free of bias often advance certain political ideas which are disguised in a so-called "objective" viewpoint. Critics may contend that the mainstream media reinforce majority-held ideas, marginalizing dissent and harming the larger political and cultural discourse.


The proposed solution is to make biases explicit, with the intention of promoting transparency and self-awareness that better serves media consumers. Advocacy journalists often assume that their audiences will share their biases (especially in politically charged alternative media), or will at least be conscious of them while evaluating what are supposed to be well-researched and persuasive arguments.


Some who believe that objective (or balanced, neutral, etc.) reporting is possible, or that it is a laudable goal, do not find that striving for objectivity is always an appropriate goal, perhaps depending on the publication and the purpose at hand.  For example, it might be argued that when attempting to expose a waste, corruption, or abuse, a neutral position would "get in the way" of the exposition, and a "bias" against this kind of criminal activity would be quite acceptable to the intended audience.


Many advocacy journalists claim that they can reject objectivity while holding on to the goals of fairness and accuracy, and claim that corporate journalists often lack both.



Investigative reporting


In some instances, advocacy journalism is the same as investigative journalism and muckraking, where these serve the public interest and the public's right to know. Investigative reports often focus on criminal or unethical activity, or aim to advance a generally accepted public interest, such as government accountability, alleviation of human suffering, etc. It might be argued that the journalist is assuming a point of view that public action is warranted to change the situation being described. The most famous example of this was Edward R. Murrow's 'See it Now' series of reports on sen. Walter McCarthy



Criticism of advocacy journalism


Professional journalists and members of the public critical of the term assert that with the sacrifice of a measure of journalist objectivity you have bad journalism: reporting that does not serve the public interest. This is essentially editorializing or sensationalizing on the news pages or during electronic news media presentations. The editorializing is not announced but only advocated by the intrinsic structure of the report.


The term might also indicate a serious breach of journalistic canons and standards, such as rumor mongering, yellow journalism, sensationalism or other ethically flawed reportage — for example, the 2004 revelations created by a press leak in the Plame affair, where a leak was used to help an office holder's political position.


Some fear the activity of advocacy journalists will be harmful to the reputation of the mainstream press as an objective, reliable source of information.  Another concern is that undiscriminating readers will accept the facts and opinions advanced in advocacy pieces as if they were objective and representative, becoming unknowingly and perhaps dangerously misinformed as a result.


Advocacy journalists vary in their response to these criticisms.  Some believe that mainstream and "alternative" outlets serve different purposes, and sometimes different audiences entirely, and that the difference is readily apparent to the public.  Many believe that the mainstream press is not an objective and reliable source of information, and so doesn't deserve the reputation it seeks to maintain.



See also



External links



Groups



History





Criticism of advocacy journalism






References



  1. "Advocacy Journalism, The Least You Can Do, and The No Confidence Movement." Dave Berman, 29 Jun 2004.  Independent Media Center. [link]
  2. "Advocacy journalism" by Sue Careless. The Interim, May 2000. [link] Rules and advice for advocacy journalists.








 





From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Original article here. Support Wikipedia by contributing or donating.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License See Wikipedia Copyrights for details.














Search Titles









0123456789
ABCDEFGHIJ
KLMNOPQRST
UVWXYZ?










E-mail this article to:



Personal Message: