About Opentopia
Opentopia Directory Encyclopedia Tools

Atom (standard)

Encyclopedia : A : AT : ATO : Atom (standard)

The name Atom applies to a pair of related standards. The Atom Syndication Format is an XML language used for web feeds, while the Atom Publishing Protocol (APP for short) is a simple HTTP-based protocol for creating and updating Web resources.

Web feeds allow software programs to check for updates published on a web site. To provide a web feed, a site owner may use specialized software (such as a content management system) that publishes a list (or "feed") of recent articles or content in a standardized, machine-readable format. The feed can then be downloaded by web sites that syndicate content from the feed, or by feed reader programs that allow Internet users to subscribe to feeds and view their content.

A feed may include headlines, full-text articles, exerpts, summaries, and/or links to content on a web site, along with various metadata. Feeds published in the Atom syndication format are sometimes called Atom feeds, Atom streams, or Atom channels.

The development of Atom was motivated by the existence of many incompatible versions of the RSS syndication format, all of which had shortcomings, and the poor interoperability [link] of XML-RPC-based publishing protocols. The Atom syndication format is now a stable IETF "proposed standard", specified in RFC 4287.

Contents

Usage

Web feeds are used by the weblog community to share the latest entries' headlines or their full text, and even attached multimedia files. (See podcasting, vodcasting, broadcasting, screencasting, Vloging, and MP3 blogs.) These providers allow other websites to incorporate their "syndicated" headline or headline-and-short-summary feeds under various usage agreements. Atom and other web syndication formats are now used for many purposes, including marketing, bug-reports, or any other activity involving periodic updates or publications.

A program known as a feed reader or aggregator can check webpages on behalf of a user and display any updated articles that it finds. It is common to find web feeds on major Web sites, as well as many smaller ones. Some websites let people choose between RSS or Atom formatted web feeds; others offer only RSS or only Atom. In particular, many Blog and Wiki sites offer their web feeds in the Atom format.

Client-side readers and aggregators are typically constructed as standalone programs or extensions to existing programs like web browsers. Browsers are moving toward integrated feed reader functions, such as Safari RSS, Opera, Firefox and Internet Explorer. Such programs are available for various operating systems.

Web-based feed readers and news aggregators require no software installation and make the user's "feeds" available on any computer with Web access. Some aggregators syndicate (combine) web feeds into new feeds, e.g., take all football related items from several sports feeds and provide a new football feed. There are also search engines for content published via web feeds like Technorati and Blogdigger.

On Web pages, web feeds (Atom or RSS) are typically linked the word "Subscribe" or with an orange rectangle, livemark.png.

Atom Compared to RSS 2.0

The [Neutral point of view>neutrality] of this section is [NPOV disputedisputed].
Please see the discussion on the [RSS 2.0 syndication format [link]. The intention was to ease the difficulty of developing applications with web syndication feeds. A brief description of the main issues of RSS 2.0 addressed by Atom 1.0 follows [link], [link]:
  • RSS 2.0 may contain either plain text or escaped HTML as a payload, with no way to indicate which of the two is provided. Atom in contrast uses an explicitly labeled (i.e. typed) payload container.
  • RSS 2.0 has a "description" element which can contain either a full entry or just a description. Atom has separate “summary” and “content” elements. Atom thus allows the inclusion of non-textual content that can be described by the summary.
  • Atom standardizes autodiscovery in contrast to the many non-standard variants used with RSS 2.0.
  • Atom is within an XML namespace whereas RSS 2.0 is not.
  • Atom specifies use of the XML's built-in xml:base for relative URIs. RSS 2.0 does not have a means of differentiating between relative and non-relative URIs.
  • Atom uses XML's built-in xml:lang attribute as opposed to RSS 2.0's use of its own "language" element.
  • In Atom, it is mandatory that each entry has a globally unique ID, which is important for reliable updating of entries.
  • Atom 1.0 allows standalone Atom Entry documents whereas with RSS 2.0 only full feed documents are supported.
  • Atom specifies that dates be in the format described in RFC 3339 (which is a subset of ISO 8601). The date format in RSS 2.0 was underspecified and has led to many different formats being used.
  • Atom 1.0 has IANA-registered MIME-type. RSS 2.0 feeds are often sent as application/rss+xml, although it is not a registered MIME-type.
  • Atom 1.0 includes an XML schema. RSS 2.0 does not.
  • Atom is an open and evolvable standard that has undergone the IETF standardization process. RSS 2.0 is not standardized by any standards body. Furthermore according to its copyright it may not be modified.

Development History

Background

Before the creation of Atom the primary method of web content syndication was the RSS family of formats.

Members of the community who felt there were significant deficiencies with this family of formats were unable to make changes directly to RSS 2.0 because it was not an open standard. RSS 2.0 was copyrighted by Harvard University and in the official specification document it stated that it was purposely frozen "no significant changes can be made and it is intended that future work be done under a different name". [link]

Initial Work

In June 2003, Sam Ruby set up a wiki to discuss what makes ["a well-formed log entry"]. This initial posting acted as a rallying point. [link] People quickly started using the wiki to discuss a new syndication format to address the shortcomings of RSS. It also became clear that the new format could also form the basis of a more robust replacement for blog editing protocols such as Blogger API and LiveJournal XML-RPC Client/Server Protocol.

The project aimed to develop a web syndication format that was: [link]

  • "100% vendor neutral,"
  • "implemented by everybody,"
  • "freely extensible by anybody, and"
  • "cleanly and thoroughly specified."
In short order, a [project road map] was built. The effort quickly attracted [more than 150 supporters] including David Sifry of Technorati, Mena Trott of Six Apart, Brad Fitzpatrick of LiveJournal, Jason Shellen of Blogger, Jeremy Zawodny of Yahoo, Timothy Appnel of the O'Reilly Network, Glenn Otis Brown of Creative Commons and Lawrence Lessig. Other notables supporting Atom include Mark Pilgrim, Tim Bray, Aaron Swartz, Joi Ito, and Jack Park. [link] Also, Dave Winer, the key figure behind RSS 2.0, gave tentative support to the Atom endeavor (which at the time was called Echo.)[link]

After this point, discussion became chaotic, due to the lack of a decision-making process. The project also lacked a name, tentatively using "Pie," "Echo," and "Necho" before settling on Atom. After releasing a project snapshot known as Atom 0.2 in early July 2003, discussion was shifted off the wiki.

Atom 0.3 and Adoption by Google

The discussion then moved to a newly set up mailing list. The next and final snapshot during this phase was Atom 0.3, released in December 2003. This version gained widespread adoption in syndication tools, and in particular it was added to several Google-related services, such as Blogger, Google News and Gmail.

Atom 1.0 and IETF Standardization

In 2004, discussions began about moving the project to a standards body such as the World Wide Web Consortium or the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). The group eventually chose the IETF and the [Atompub working group] was formally setup in June 2004, finally giving the project a charter and process. The Atompub working group is co-chaired by Tim Bray (the co-editor of the XML specification) and Paul Hoffman. Initial development was focused on the syndication format.

The final draft of Atom 1.0 was published in July 2005 and was accepted by the IETF as a "proposed standard" in August of 2005. Work then continued on the further development of the publishing protocol and various extensions to the syndication format.

The Atom Syndication Format was issued as a proposed "internet official protocol standard" in IETF RFC 4287 in December 2005. [link] The co-editors of RFC 4287 were Mark Nottingham and Robert Sayre.

Example of an Atom 1.0 Feed

An example of a document in the Atom Syndication Format: 





Example Feed
Insert witty or insightful remark here

2003-12-13T18:30:02Z

John Doe
johndoe@example.com

urn:uuid:60a76c80-d399-11d9-b91C-0003939e0af6




Atom-Powered Robots Run Amok

urn:uuid:1225c695-cfb8-4ebb-aaaa-80da344efa6a
2003-12-13T18:30:02Z
Some text.

See also

External links

 

From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Original article here. Support Wikipedia by contributing or donating.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License See Wikipedia Copyrights for details.

Search Titles
0123456789
ABCDEFGHIJ
KLMNOPQRST
UVWXYZ?

E-mail this article to:

Personal Message: