Consciousness-only

Encyclopedia : C : CO : CON : Consciousness-only

This article is missing and/or [Footnotefootnotes]. To meet Wikipedia's and conform to our policies regarding [Neutral point of viewNPOV] and [Verifiabilityverifiability], please provide appropriate citations and/or footnotes.
For guidance in this area, see [Footnotes#How to use].

Part of a on Buddhism
History of Buddhism Timeline of Buddhism Buddhist councils
Foundations Four Noble Truths Noble Eightfold Path The Five Precepts Nirvāna · Three Jewels
Buddhism In Depth Three marks of existence Skandha · Karma · Dharma Samsara · Rebirth · Shunyata Pratitya-samutpada · Cosmology
Major Figures Gautama Buddha Sariputta · Moggallana Ananda · Mahakashyapa
Buddhahood · Bodhisattva Four stages of enlightenment Paramis · meditation
Buddhism by Region Southeast Asia · East Asia Tibet · India · Western
Schools of Buddhism Theravada · Mahāyāna Vajrayāna · Early schools
Texts Pali Suttas · Mahayana Sutras Vinaya · Abhidhamma
Buddhist Culture List of Buddhist Topics This box: [ view] • [ talk] • [ edit]

In Buddhism, consciousness-only (Sanskrit: vijñapti-mātratā, vijñapti-mātra, citta-mātra; Chinese: 唯識; Pinyin: wei shi; Japanese: yuishiki) is a theory according to which all existence is nothing but consciousness, and therefore there is nothing that lies outside of the mind. This means that conscious-experience is nothing but false discriminations or imaginations; a provisional antidote; thus, the notion of consciousness-only is an indictment of the problems engendered by the activities of consciousness. This was a major component of the thought of the school of Yogācāra, which had a major impact on subsequent schools after its introduction in East Asia.

Doctrine

The factual accuracy of this section is [Accuracy disputedisputed]. Please view the article's [talk page]

According to the Vijñānavādins, embedded at the heart of Buddhism lies a seeming paradox. In contrast to the Brahmanic teachings of the Upanishads, the Buddha stated quite clearly that the self (atman) is an illusion and that man thus has no soul (anatman). However, there is transmigration (samsara) from one body to another. This poses a difficult question: "If there is no soul, what is it that reincarnates?"^{([Disputed statementdisputed]—see [bija}) similar to themselves, according to a regular pattern, as seeds produce plants. Each being possesses a store of perceptions and beings which are generically alike will produce similar perceptions from their stores at the same time. The external world is created when the store consciousness (ālaya) is "perfumed" (薰) by seeds, i.e. the effects of good and evil deeds.

To summarize, the seeds interact in three ways:

Seeds produce the external world.
Seeds are perfumed by the external world.
Seeds produce seeds.

And this gives the solution to the original paradox. The conception of "self", the false atman, is produced from seeds. Actions in this world, good, bad and neutral deeds, perfume (or mutate) these seeds. The seeds then produce new seeds, with some seeds tainted by your actions, and others unaffected. Even after death, the impressions of deeds — their karma — linger on in the seeds of alaya consciousness. Since the seeds have a natural affinity to join together (pratisamdhi), reincarnation occurs when seeds fuse and new states of seventh consciousness (delusions of "self") form. A Buddha is someone who has managed to obliterate all impressions of himself, all his perfumings of the seeds, and escape the wheel of samsara. Such alaya consciousness fully cleansed of karmic sediment is known as amalavijñâna, or "pure consciousness".

The doctrine of consciousness-only thus reduces all existence to one hundred dharmas (法 factors) in five divisions 五位, namely, mind, mental function, material, not associated with mind and unconditioned, dharmas. The consciousness-only school thus sets out to enumerate and describe all these dharmas in detail.

An alternative explanation to the truism that "man has no soul" lies in a simple but powerful extension and paradigm shift: "man has no soul, rather, the soul has man." In other words, we are spiritual beings having a human experience, not human beings having a spiritual experience. Assertions that "man" has a "soul" are necessarily false because man's physical existence, which "man" most predominantly identifies with, is merely an observable artifact of the true spiritual reality.

Another important contribution of the consciousness-only thinkers was that of the three natures of imaginary, provisional and real. See three natures for details.

History

The major framework of Yogācāra theory was developed by the two brothers Vasubandhu 世親 and Asaṅga 無著 in such treatises as the Abdhidharma-kośa-bhāsya 倶舍論, the Triṃśikā Vijñaptimātratāsiddhiḥ (Thirty Verses on Consciousness-only) 唯識三十頌, Mahāyāna-saṃgraha 攝大乘論, and the Yogācārabhūmi-śāstra 瑜伽師地論. Dharmapala's Vijñaptimâtratâsiddhi-shâstra is an important commentary that resolved several doctrinal disputes that had risen out of the original texts.

Consciousness-only doctrine was also defined in sutras such as the Samdhinirmocanasutra 解深密經 and Śrīmālā-sūtra 勝鬘經. The Mahāyāna-saṃgraha, for example, says, "All conscious objects are only constructs of consciousness because there are no external objects. They are like a dream." (如此衆識唯識以無塵等故譬如夢等) 〔攝大乘論T 1593.31.118b12 〕.

Hindu philosophy	Samkhya > Nyaya \| Vaisheshika \| Yoga \| Mimamsa \| Advaita Vedanta \| Vishishtadvaita \| Dvaita \| Carvaka \| Logic \| Idealism
Jain philosophy	Anekantavada
Buddhist philosophy	Shunyata
Philosophers	Gotama > Patanjali \| Yajnavalkya \| Kanada \| Kapila \| Jaimini \| Vyasa \| Nagarjuna \| Madhavacharya \| Kumarajiva \| Padmasambhava \| Vasubandhu \| Adi Shankara\| Ramanuja\| Katyayana \|
Texts	Yoga Sutra \| Nyaya Sutra \| Vaiseshika Sutra \| Samkhya Sutra \| Mimamsa Sutra \| Brahma Sutra \| Mūlamadhyamakakārikā \| More...

Consciousness-only

Doctrine

History

See also