About Opentopia
Opentopia Directory Encyclopedia Tools

Elliptic integral

Encyclopedia : E : EL : ELL : Elliptic integral



In integral calculus, elliptic integrals originally arose in connection with the problem of giving the arc length of an ellipse and were first studied by Giulio Fagnano and Leonhard Euler.

In the modern definition, an elliptic integral is any function f which can be expressed in the form

[ f(x) = \int_^ R(t,P(t))\ dt ]
where R is a rational function of its two arguments, P is the square root of a polynomial of degree 3 or 4 (a cubic or quartic) with no repeated roots, and c is a constant.

In general, elliptic integrals cannot be expressed in terms of elementary functions; exceptions to this are when P does have repeated roots, or when R(x,y) contains no odd powers of y. However, with appropriate reduction formula, every elliptic integral can be brought into a form that involves integrals over rational functions, and the three canonical forms (i.e. the elliptic integrals of the first, second and third kind).

Besides the forms given below, the elliptic integrals may also be expressed in Legendre form and Carlson symmetric form. Additional insight into the theory of the indefinite integral may be gained through the study of the Schwarz-Christoffel mapping.

Contents

Notation

Elliptic integrals are often expressed as functions of a variety of different arguments. These different arguments are completely equivalent (they give the same elliptic integral), but can be confusing due to their different appearance. Most texts adhere to a canonical naming scheme. Before defining the integrals, we review the naming conventions for the arguments:

Note that the above three are completely determined by one another; specifying one is the same as specifying another. The elliptic integrals will also depend on another argument; this can also be specified in a number of different ways:

Specifying any one of these determines the others, and thus again, these may be used interchangeably in the notation. Note that u also depends on m. Some additional relationships involving u include
[\cos \phi = \textrm\; u]
and
[\sqrt = \textrm\; u].
The latter is sometimes called the delta amplitude and written as [\Delta(\phi)=\textrm\; u].

Sometimes the literature refers to the complementary parameter, the complementary modulus or the complementary modular angle. These are further defined in the article on quarter periods.

Incomplete elliptic integral of the first kind

The incomplete elliptic integral of the first kind F is defined, in Jacobi's form, as
[ F(x;k) =\int_^ \frac }\ dt \,\!]
Equivalently, using alternate notation above, one sets [x=\sin \phi ~,~ t=\sin \theta ~,~ =\sin(\alpha) ~,~m=k^2~\;\!]; then
[ F(x;k) = F(\phi|m) = F(\phi\setminus \alpha ) =\int_0^\phi \frac} \ d\theta \,\!]
where it is understood that when there is a vertical bar used, the argument following the vertical bar is the parameter (as defined above), and, when a backslash is used, it is followed by the modular angle. In this sense, [ F(\sin \phi;\sin \alpha) = F(\phi|\sin (\alpha )^2) = F(\phi\setminus \alpha )~ \,\!]. These notations are borrowed from the book Abramowitz and Stegun; the use of the delimiters ; | \ is traditional in elliptic integrals.

There are differing conventions regarding notation of elliptic integrals. The differences can be very confusing, especially to a novice, see . The functions, which evaluate the elliptic integrals, do not have standard and unic names and meanings (like sqrt, sin and erf have). Diffent notations are used in the literature. Gradstein, Ryzhik [[link], Eq.(8.111)] and the wiki article Legendre form use notation [ F(\phi,k) \,\!], which is equivalent to our [ F(\phi|k^2)~ \,\!]; also [ E(\phi,k)=E(\phi|k^2)~ \,\!] below. For example, if one translates a code from langguage of Mathematica into Maple computer algebra system, one should replace the argument of the EllipticK function to its square (and to its sqrt at the translation from Maple to Mathematica), EllipticK(x) in Maple is almost equivalent of EllipticK[x^2] in Mathematica; one may expect to get the same result in both systems, at least while 0 Note that

[F(x;k) = u \,\!]
with u as defined above: thus, the Jacobian elliptic functions are inverses to the elliptic integrals.

Incomplete elliptic integral of the second kind

The incomplete elliptic integral of the second kind E is
[ E(x;k) = \int_^ \frac } }\ dt ]
Equivalently, using alternate notation, (substituting [t=\sin\theta])

[ E(x;k) = E(\phi|m) = E(\phi\setminus \alpha ) =\int_0^\phi \sqrt \ d\theta ]
Additional relations include
[E(\phi|m) = \int_0^u \textrm^2 w \;dw =
u-m\int_0^u \textrm^2 w \;dw = (1-m)u+m\int_0^u \textrm^2 w \;dw]

Incomplete elliptic integral of the third kind

The incomplete elliptic integral of the third kind [\Pi] is
[ \Pi(n; \phi|m) = \int_^ \frac \frac }\ dt ]
or
[ \Pi(n; \phi|m) = \int_0^\phi \frac\frac } \ d\theta]
or
[ \Pi(n; \phi|m) = \int_0^u \frac^2 (w|m)} \; dw]
The number n is called the characteristic and can take on any value, independently of the other arguments. Note though that the value [\Pi(1;\pi/2|m)] is infinite, for any [m].

Complete elliptic integral of the first kind

The complete elliptic integral of the first kind K is defined as

[ K(k) = \int_^ \frac }\ dt ]
and can be computed in terms of the arithmetic-geometric mean.

It can also be calculated as

[ K(k) = \frac \sum_^ k^ \frac]
Or in the form of an integral of the sine, when 0 ≤ k ≤ 1
[K( k ) = \int_0^} \frac}]
In terms of the Gauss hypergeometric function, the complete elliptic integral of the first kind can be expressed as

[K(k) = \frac\left\\right)^2 k^ + \left( \frac\right)^2 k^ + \ldots + \left[fracn!}right]^2 k^ + \ldots \right\} = \frac F \left(\frac, \frac; 1 ; k^\right)]
The complete elliptic integral of the first kind is sometimes called the quarter period.

Complete elliptic integral of the second kind

The complete elliptic integral of the second kind E is defined as
[ E(k) = \int_^ \frac } }\ dt ]
Or if 0 ≤ k ≤ 1:

[E( k ) = \int_0^} \sqrt \ d\theta]

History

Historically, elliptic functions were discovered as inverse functions of elliptic integrals, and this one in particular: we have F(sn(z;k);k) = z where sn is one of Jacobi's elliptic functions.

See also

References

 

From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Original article here. Support Wikipedia by contributing or donating.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License See Wikipedia Copyrights for details.



Search Titles
0123456789
ABCDEFGHIJ
KLMNOPQRST
UVWXYZ?

E-mail this article to:

Personal Message: