English plural
Encyclopedia : E : EN : ENG : English plural
Note that phonetic transcriptions provided in this article are for General American.
- 1 Regular plurals
- 2 Almost-regular plurals
- 3 Irregular plurals
- 3.1 Irregular Germanic plurals
- 3.2 Irregular plurals from Latin and Greek
- 3.3 Irregular plurals from other languages
- 3.4 Words better known in the plural
- 4 Plurals of numbers
- 5 Plurals and units of measure
- 6 Defective nouns
- 7 Nouns with multiple plurals
- 8 Plurals of symbols and abbreviations
- 9 Plurals of acronyms and initialisms
- 10 Plurals of headless nouns
- 11 Plural to singular by back-formation
- 12 Plurals of names of peoples
- 13 Discretionary plurals
- 14 Snob plurals
- 15 External link
Regular plurals
The plural morpheme in English is suffixed to the end of most nouns. The plural form is usually represented orthographically by adding -s to the singular form (see exceptions below). The phonetic form of the plural morpheme is [z] by default. When the preceding sound is a voiceless consonant, it is pronounced [s]. Examples:| boy | boys | |
| girl | girls | |
| chair | chairs | |
| cat | cats |
| glass | glasses | |
| dish | dishes | |
| witch | witches | |
| phase | phases | |
| judge | judges |
The -oes rule: most nouns ending in o preceded by a consonant also form their plurals by adding -es (pronounced [z]):
| hero | heroes |
| potato | potatoes |
| volcano | volcanoes |
| cherry | cherries |
| lady | ladies |
| Harry | Harrys (as in There are three Harrys in our office) |
| Germany | Germanys (as in The two Germanys were unified in 1990) |
| P&O Ferries (from ferry) |
| henry | henrys |
| zloty | zlotys |
| monkey | monkeys |
| day | days |
Almost-regular plurals
Many nouns of Italian or Spanish origin are exceptions to the -oes rule:| canto | cantos |
| piano | pianos |
| portico | porticos |
| quarto (paper size) | quartos |
| solo | solos |
| calf | calves | |
| wolf | wolves | |
| bath | baths | |
| mouth | mouths | |
| house | houses |
Note 1: Dwarf is an interesting case: the common form of the plural was dwarfs — as, for example, in Walt Disney's Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs — until J. R. R. Tolkien popularised dwarves; he intended the changed spelling to differentiate the "dwarf" race in his novels from the cuter and simpler beings common in fairy tales, but it has since spread. Multiple dwarf stars, or non-mythological short human beings, however, are dwarfs.
Note 2: For staff in the sense of "a body of employees", the plural is always staffs; otherwise both staffs and staves are acceptable, except in compounds; such as flagstaffs. The stave of a barrel or cask is a back-formation from staves, which is its plural. (See the Plural to singular by back-formation section below.)
Irregular plurals
There are many other less regular ways of forming plurals. While they may seem quirky, they usually stem from older forms of English or from foreign borrowings.Irregular Germanic plurals
The plural of a few Germanic nouns can also be formed from the singular by adding n or en, stemming from the obsolete weak declension: The word box, referring to a computer, is semi-humorously pluralized boxen in the Leet dialect. Multiple Vax computers, likewise, are sometimes called Vaxen, but multiple Unix systems are usually Unices (see Irregular plurals of foreign origin below).The plural is sometimes formed by simply changing the vowel sound of the singular, in a process called umlaut (these are sometimes called mutated plurals): Some nouns have singular and plural alike, although they are sometimes seen as regular plurals.
- aircraft
- sheep
- moose
- deer
- fish, cod, trout, etc.
- head, when used to mean "animals in a herd"; fifty head of cattle.
- cannon
Irregular plurals from Latin and Greek
Because English includes words from so many ancestral languages, as well as many loanwords from Latin, Classical Greek and modern languages, there are many other forms of plurals. Such nouns (particularly ones from Latin) often retain their original plurals, at least for some time after they are introduced. In some cases both forms are still vying for attention: for example, for a librarian, the plural of appendix is appendices (following the original language); for physicians, however, the plural of appendix is appendixes. Likewise, a radio engineer works with antennas and an entomologist deals with antennae. The "correct" form is the one that sounds better in context, or that people in the field use.Correctly formed Latin plurals are the most acceptable, and indeed are often required, in academic and scientific contexts. In common usage, plurals with -s are sometimes preferred.
- Final a becomes ae (also æ) — or just adds s:
- Final ex or ix becomes ices (pronounced [ɪˌsiːz] or [əˌsiz]) — or just adds es:
Some people treat process as if it belonged to this class, pronouncing processes /ˈpɹɑsɪˌsiːz/ instead of standard /ˈpɹɑsɛsɪz/
- Final is becomes es (pronounced [ˌiːz]:
- Final ies remains unchanged:
- Final on becomes a:
- Final um becomes a – or just adds s
- Final us becomes i (second declension) or era or ora (third declension) — or just adds es (especially in fourth declension, where it would otherwise be the same as the singular):
Related is the use amongst Petrolheads of the term "Loti" to refer to examples of Lotus Cars in the plural.
- Final as in one case of a noun of Greek origin changes to antes:
- Final ma in nouns of Greek origin add ta:
- Final us in nouns of Greek origin "properly" add es. These words are also heard with the Latin -i instead, which is sometimes considered "over-correct", but this is so common as to be acceptable in most circumstances, even technical ones.
Irregular plurals from other languages
- Some nouns of French origin add x
Foreign terms may use native plural forms, especially when the words are unfamiliar to an anglophone audience, or when writing for an audience familiar with the language. In either case, the unfamiliar conventionally-formed English plural may sound awkward, or be confusing.
- Examples of nouns from Slavic languages.
- Nouns of Hebrew language origin add im or ot (generally m/f) — or just s
Note that ot is pronounced os in the Ashkenazi dialect.
- Some nouns of Japanese origin have no plural and do not change:
- In New Zealand English, nouns of Māori origin can either take an s or have no separate plural form. Words more connected to Māori culture and used in that context tend to retain the same form, while names of flora and fauna may or may not take an s, depending on context. Omission is regarded by many as more correct.
- In Canada and Alaska, some words borrowed from Inuktitut retain traditional plurals (see also #Plurals of names of peoples, below):
- Nouns from languages that have donated few words to English, and that are spoken by relatively few English-speakers, generally form plurals as if they were native English words:
Words better known in the plural
Some words of foreign origin are much better known in the plural; usage of the proper singular may be considered pedantic or actually incorrect by some speakers. In common usage, the proper plural is considered the singular form. Back-formation has usually resulted in a regularized plural. Note: A single piece of data is often referred to as a data point. A military phalanx is pluralized phalanxes. The phalanges as body parts (fingers and toes) are rarely referred to in the singular.
A related phenomenon is the confusion of a foreign plural for its singular form:
Magazine is a plural noun, from Arabic via French, but is always regarded as singular in English; the plural is magazines.
Plurals of numbers
English, like some other languages, treats large numerals like nouns, such as in "ten soldiers" and "a hundred soldiers." This is why dozens is preferred to tens while hundreds and thousands are all right.Plurals of numerals differ according to how they are used. Such words include dozen, score, hundred, thousand, million, and so forth. The following examples apply to all of these.
- When modified by a number, the plural is not inflected, that is, has no s added. Hence one hundred, two hundred, etc. For vaguer large numbers, one could say several hundred, but many hundreds.
- When used alone, or followed by a prepositional phrase, the plural is inflected: dozens of complaints, scores of people. However, either complaints by the dozen or complaints by the dozens is acceptable (although differing in meaning).
- The preposition of is used when speaking of non-specific items identified by pronouns: two hundred of these, three dozen of those. The of is not used for a number of specific items: three hundred oriental rugs. However, if the pronoun is included with the specific item, the of is used: five million of those dollar bills.
Plurals and units of measure
Words that are being used as a unit of measure are kept in the singular when the measure it is a part of is used as an adjective. Thus for example a "twenty-dollar bill" is a bill worth "twenty dollars", a "fifteen-car wreck" is a wreck involving "fifteen cars", and a "ten-foot pole" is a pole that is "ten feet" in length except when used idiomatically.Defective nouns
Some nouns have no singular form. Such a noun is called a plurale tantum:
- annals, billiards*, measles, nuptials, thanks, tidings, victuals, vittles, credentials
- * This refers to the table game, not the number 1015 in the long scale system of numeric names, which can be singular billiard.
Neither do some names of things having two parts:
- pants, scissors, trousers, tweezers
A compound that has a head at the beginning, particularly a legal term from French, commonly pluralizes its head: They don't have to be considered irregular, because an attorney general is a kind of attorney, not general, and a court martial is a kind of court, not martial. It is common in informal speech to pluralize the last word in the usual way, but in edited prose, the forms given are preferred.
On the other hand, if a compound can be thought to have two heads, both of them are sometimes pluralized, especially when the first head has an irregular plural form:
Comment: agent provocateur is a French term: agent is a noun and provocateur is an adjective. In French, the adjective must agree with the noun, so when the noun becomes plural, so does the adjective. This is not an exception. It is just following the rules of the originating language.
See also the Plurals of headless nouns section below.
Mass nouns (or uncountable nouns) do not represent distinct objects, so the singular and plural semantics do not apply in the same way. Some examples:
- Abstract nouns
- goodness, idleness, wisdom, deceit, honesty, freshness
- Arts and sciences (even those ending in ics are treated as singular)
- chemistry, geometry, surgery, biometrics, mechanics, optics, blues (in music)
- Other mass nouns, such as chemical elements and substances:
- antimony, gold, oxygen, equipment, furniture, species, distress, sand, water, air, information
It is rare to pluralize furniture in this way. Nor would information be so treated, except in the case of criminal informations, which are prosecutor's briefs similar to indictments.
There is only one class of atoms called oxygen, but there are several isotopes of oxygen, which might be referred to as different oxygens. In casual speech, oxygen might be used as shorthand for "oxygen atoms", but in this case it is not a mass noun, so it is entirely sensible to refer to multiple oxygens in the same molecule.
One would interpret "Bob's wisdoms" as various pieces of Bob's wisdom (that is, pieces of advice), deceits as a series of instances of deceitful behavior, and the different idlenesses of the worker as plural distinct manifestations of the mass concept of idleness (or as different types of idleness, "bone lazy" versus "no work to do").
- Specie and species make a fascinating case. Both words come from a Latin word meaning "kind", but they do not form a singular-plural pair; they are separate nouns. Coins, such as nickels, euro/euros (see Linguistic issues concerning the euro), and cents are specie, but there is no plural. The idea is "payment in kind". And species, the "kinds of living things", is the same in singular and plural.
- Some names of elements, such as nickel, have plurals in non-chemical uses, as "five nickels to the quarter".
Nouns with multiple plurals
Some nouns have two plurals, one used to refer to a number of things considered individually, the other to refer to a number of things collectively. In some cases, one of the two is nowadays archaic or dialectal. Note a: Childer has all but disappeared, but can still be seen in Childermas (Innocents' Day). Note b: Kine is still used in rural English dialects. Note c: Dies is used as the plural for die in the sense of a mould; dice as the plural (and increasingly as the singular) in the sense of a small random number generator. "Dice" is also the accepted plural form of die in the semiconductor industry. Note d: Fish: the plural for one species of fish, or caught fish, is fish, but for live fish of many species, or in poetic usage, fishes is used. Note e: If you have several (British) one-penny pieces you have several pennies. Pence is used for an amount of money, which can be made up of a number of coins of different denominations: one penny and one five-penny piece are together worth six pence. Penny and pennies also refer to one or more U.S. one-cent pieces. But in American usage, a nickel is worth five cents, not five pence, though a penny is worth one cent (not plural). Note f: For multiple plants, iris is used, but irises is used for multiple blossoms. Note g: Clothes refers collectively to all of the cloth covering a person's body.A final odd case is person. The word people is usually treated as the suppletive plural of person (one person, many people). However, in legal and other formal contexts, the plural of person is persons; furthermore, people can also be a singular noun with its own plural (for example, "We are many persons, from many peoples").
Plurals of symbols and abbreviations
Symbols and abbreviations whose plural would be ambiguous if only an s were added are pluralized by adding 's.
- "mind your p's and q's"
Plurals of acronyms and initialisms
Acronyms and initialisms are generally used as if they are words. Clearly, one would tend not to pluralize the laser initialism as laser's. Thus the most consistent approach for pluralizing acronyms is likely to simply add a lowercase s as a suffix. This works well even for acronyms ending with an S, as in CASs (pronounced 'kazzes'), while still making it possible to use the possessive form ('s) for acronyms without confusion.The traditional style of pluralizing single letters with 's (as explained above for symbols and abbreviations) was naturally extended to acronyms when they were commonly written with periods. This form is still preferred by some people for initialisms and thus the form using 's as a suffix is often seen in general usage.
Plurals of headless nouns
Linguist Steven Pinker, in his book, The Language Instinct discusses what he calls "headless words", typically bahuvrihis, like lowlife and Red Sox, where the life and sox are not heads semantically; that is, a lowlife is not a type of life, nor are Red Sox a kind of sock. Thus, more than one lowlife is lowlifes and a single member of the Boston baseball team is a Red Sox. Other examples include the Toronto ice-hockey team Maple Leafs, not Maple Leaves, sabertooth and sabertooths, flatfoot and flatfoots, tenderfoot and tenderfoots, still life and still lifes. An exception is Blackfoot, of which the plural can be Blackfeet.Mouse is sometimes pluralized mouses when it refers to a computer mouse, although, in this case, mice is just as common because of the physical similarity between the input device and the rodent, which is the origin of the term.
Plural to singular by back-formation
Some words have started out with unusually formed singulars and plurals, but more "normal" singular-plural pairs have resulted by back-formation. For an example from the vegetable world, pease was the singular and peasen the plural, but over the centuries, first pease became the plural and pea the singular, and finally the plural was altered to peas. Similarly, termites and primates were the three-syllable plurals of termes and primas, respectively, but these singulars were lost, the plurals given two syllables, and now we have termite and termites and primate and primates. Syringe is a back-formation from syringes, itself the plural of syrinx, a musical instrument. Cherry is from Norman French cherise. Finally, phases was once the plural of phasis, but the singular is now phase.Kudos is a singular Greek word meaning praise, but the same process may be happening to it. At present, kudo is an error, however. The name of the Greek sandwich style gyros is, increasingly, undergoing the same transformation. Gyros is from the Greek for "turning," but it looks like an English plural, and it is not uncommon to hear or see a reference to "a gyro".
The singular form of Spanish tamales (IPA: [ta ˈmal es]) is tamal ([ta ˈmal]). The anglicized version of tamales is pronounced [tə ˈmɑl iz] and the back-formed singular is tamale [(tə ˈmɑl i)].
Plurals of names of peoples
There are several different rules for this.In discussing peoples whose demonym takes -man or -woman, there are three options: pluralize to -men or -women if referring to individuals, and use the root alone if referring to the whole nation, or add people. One can say "a Scots(wo)man" or "a Scot", "Scots(wo)men", "Scottish people", or "Scots," and "the Scottish" or "the Scots". (Scotch is considered old fashioned.)
Several peoples have names that are simple nouns and can be pluralized: Names of peoples that end in -ese take no plural: Neither do Swiss or Québécois.
Most names for Native Americans are not pluralized:
- Ojibwa
- Iroquois
- Blood
- Mi'kmaq
Discretionary plurals
A number of words like army, fleet, Government, company, party, pack, crowd, mess, number, and majority, may refer either to a single entity or the members of the set that compose it. Thus, in British English they are "treated as singular or plural at discretion," as H.W. Fowler put it, who noted that occasionally a "delicate distinction" is made possible by discretionary plurals: "The Cabinet is divided is better, because in the order of thought a whole must precede division; and The Cabinet are agreed is better, because it takes two or more to agree" (A Dictionary of Modern English Usage, 2nd ed., revised by Sir Ernest Gowers [New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1965], p. 403). Also in British English, names of towns and countries take plural verbs when they refer to sports teams but singular verbs when they refer to the actual place: England are playing Germany tonight refers to a football game, but England is the most populous country of the United Kingdom refers to the country. In North American English, such words are invariably treated as singular.Snob plurals
Another type of irregular plural occurs in the register of the English upper classes in the context of field sports, where the singular form is used in place of the plural, as in "a herd of antelope", "two lion" or "five pheasant". Eric Partridge in Usage & Abusage refers to these as "Snob Plurals" and conjectures that they may have developed by analogy with the common English irregular plural animal words "deer", "sheep" and "trout".The term snob plurals can be applied more generally to uses of forms of pluralization characterized, first, by their departure from the standard English rule of adding -(e)s, and, second, by the likelihood they are being so used to enhance the status of the speaker. While speaking to a group of monolingual anglophone friends, someone talking about a recent trip to Russia who says, "We visited five oblasti," is most likely using a snob plural. The use of latinate plurals for nouns of Greek origin mentioned earlier in this article often are used as snob plurals--cacti or hipopotomi--although for many speakers this is simply the unmarked usage. The use of non-standard plurals can be one convenient way to communicate the claim that the speaker has greater knowledge, and therefore sophistication, than the interlocutor possesses. Because the pragmatics of this usage are heavily dependent on context, it's impossible to say that a particular use of pluarization is, or is not, a snob plural in the absence of information about the context of use. Someone speaking at a conference to colleagues who are Slavicists might use oblasti without the expectation of enhanced social status and, therefore, not using a snob plural. Articles in encyclopedias are, on the whole, written for the general reader and avoid forms of plural that would likely confuse those not already familiar with the topic.
External link
From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Original article here. Support Wikipedia by contributing or donating.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License See Wikipedia Copyrights for details.
