Opentopia Directory Encyclopedia Tools

English plural

Encyclopedia : E : EN : ENG : English plural


In the English language, nouns are inflected for grammatical number — that is, singular or plural. This article discusses the variety of ways in which English plurals are formed.

Note that phonetic transcriptions provided in this article are for General American.

Regular plurals

The plural morpheme in English is suffixed to the end of most nouns. The plural form is usually represented orthographically by adding -s to the singular form (see exceptions below). The phonetic form of the plural morpheme is [z] by default. When the preceding sound is a voiceless consonant, it is pronounced [s]. Examples:
boy boys
girl girls
chair chairs
cat cats
Where a noun ends in a sibilant sound — one of [s], [ʃ], [ʧ], [z], [ʒ], and [ʤ] — the plural is formed by adding [ɪz] (also pronounced [əz]), which is spelled -es if the word does not already end with -e:
glass glasses
dish dishes
witch witches
phase phases
judge judges
Morphophonetically, these rules are sufficient to describe most English plurals. However, there are several complications introduced in spelling.

The -oes rule: most nouns ending in o preceded by a consonant also form their plurals by adding -es (pronounced [z]):
hero heroes
potato potatoes
volcano volcanoes
The -ies rule: nouns ending in a y preceded by a consonant drop the y and add -ies (pronounced [iz]):
cherry cherries
lady ladies
Note, however, that proper nouns (particularly those for people or places) ending in a y preceded by a consonant form their plurals regularly:
Harry Harrys (as in There are three Harrys in our office)
Germany Germanys (as in The two Germanys were unified in 1990)
This does not apply to words that are merely capitalised common nouns:
P&O Ferries (from ferry)
A few common nouns ending in a y preceded by a consonant form their plurals regularly:
henry henrys
zloty zlotys
But words ending in a vowel followed by y form their plurals regularly:
monkey monkeys
day days

Almost-regular plurals

Many nouns of Italian or Spanish origin are exceptions to the -oes rule:
canto cantos
piano pianos
portico porticos
quarto (paper size) quartos
solo solos
Many nouns ending in a voiceless fricative mutate that sound to a voiced fricative before adding the plural ending. In the case of [f] changing to [v] the mutation is indicated in the orthography as well:
calf calves
wolf wolves
bath baths
mouth mouths
house houses
Some retain the voiceless consonant: Some can do either:

Note 1: Dwarf is an interesting case: the common form of the plural was dwarfs — as, for example, in Walt Disney's Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs — until J. R. R. Tolkien popularised dwarves; he intended the changed spelling to differentiate the "dwarf" race in his novels from the cuter and simpler beings common in fairy tales, but it has since spread. Multiple dwarf stars, or non-mythological short human beings, however, are dwarfs.

Note 2: For staff in the sense of "a body of employees", the plural is always staffs; otherwise both staffs and staves are acceptable, except in compounds; such as flagstaffs. The stave of a barrel or cask is a back-formation from staves, which is its plural. (See the Plural to singular by back-formation section below.)

Irregular plurals

There are many other less regular ways of forming plurals. While they may seem quirky, they usually stem from older forms of English or from foreign borrowings.

Irregular Germanic plurals

The plural of a few Germanic nouns can also be formed from the singular by adding n or en, stemming from the obsolete weak declension: The word box, referring to a computer, is semi-humorously pluralized boxen in the Leet dialect. Multiple Vax computers, likewise, are sometimes called Vaxen, but multiple Unix systems are usually Unices (see Irregular plurals of foreign origin below).

The plural is sometimes formed by simply changing the vowel sound of the singular, in a process called umlaut (these are sometimes called mutated plurals): Some nouns have singular and plural alike, although they are sometimes seen as regular plurals.

aircraft
sheep
moose
deer
fish, cod, trout, etc.
head, when used to mean "animals in a herd"; fifty head of cattle.
cannon
Some, especially the names of animals, have regular plurals, but these contrast in meaning with the unmarked plurals. Generally, plurals refer to several species or kinds of animal, while the unmarked plural is used to describe multiple individual animals; one would say the order [classification] of fishes, but five fish in an aquarium.

Irregular plurals from Latin and Greek

Because English includes words from so many ancestral languages, as well as many loanwords from Latin, Classical Greek and modern languages, there are many other forms of plurals. Such nouns (particularly ones from Latin) often retain their original plurals, at least for some time after they are introduced. In some cases both forms are still vying for attention: for example, for a librarian, the plural of appendix is appendices (following the original language); for physicians, however, the plural of appendix is appendixes. Likewise, a radio engineer works with antennas and an entomologist deals with antennae. The "correct" form is the one that sounds better in context, or that people in the field use.

Correctly formed Latin plurals are the most acceptable, and indeed are often required, in academic and scientific contexts. In common usage, plurals with -s are sometimes preferred.

Some people treat process as if it belonged to this class, pronouncing processes /ˈpɹɑsɪˌsiːz/ instead of standard /ˈpɹɑsɛsɪz/

Note that axes the plural of axis is pronounced differently from axes (/ˈæksɪz/) the plural of axe. Note: See article on the plural of virus.

Related is the use amongst Petrolheads of the term "Loti" to refer to examples of Lotus Cars in the plural.

Though some take s more commonly: The Greek plural for words ending in -pus (gr. poûs) meaning "foot", such as octopus and platypus, is -podes, but this plural is rare for octopus and has never been accepted for platypus.

Irregular plurals from other languages

Foreign terms may use native plural forms, especially when the words are unfamiliar to an anglophone audience, or when writing for an audience familiar with the language. In either case, the unfamiliar conventionally-formed English plural may sound awkward, or be confusing.

However, other nouns such as kimonos, futons and tsunamis are more often seen with a regular English plural.

Note: kiwi, when referring to the bird, may or may not take an s, but when used as an informal term for a New Zealander, always takes an s. Māori, when referring to a person of that ethnicity, does not usually take an s. Many speakers avoid the use of Māori as a noun, and instead use it only as an adjective.

Words better known in the plural

Some words of foreign origin are much better known in the plural; usage of the proper singular may be considered pedantic or actually incorrect by some speakers. In common usage, the proper plural is considered the singular form. Back-formation has usually resulted in a regularized plural. Note: A single piece of data is often referred to as a data point. A military phalanx is pluralized phalanxes. The phalanges as body parts (fingers and toes) are rarely referred to in the singular.

A related phenomenon is the confusion of a foreign plural for its singular form:

Magazine is a plural noun, from Arabic via French, but is always regarded as singular in English; the plural is magazines.

Plurals of numbers

English, like some other languages, treats large numerals like nouns, such as in "ten soldiers" and "a hundred soldiers." This is why dozens is preferred to tens while hundreds and thousands are all right.

Plurals of numerals differ according to how they are used. Such words include dozen, score, hundred, thousand, million, and so forth. The following examples apply to all of these.

Plurals and units of measure

Words that are being used as a unit of measure are kept in the singular when the measure it is a part of is used as an adjective. Thus for example a "twenty-dollar bill" is a bill worth "twenty dollars", a "fifteen-car wreck" is a wreck involving "fifteen cars", and a "ten-foot pole" is a pole that is "ten feet" in length except when used idiomatically.

Defective nouns

Some nouns have no singular form. Such a noun is called a plurale tantum:

annals, billiards*, measles, nuptials, thanks, tidings, victuals, vittles, credentials
* This refers to the table game, not the number 1015 in the long scale system of numeric names, which can be singular billiard.
However, some of them do have singular adjective forms, such as in billiard ball. In addition, some of them are treated as singular in construction, such as in "billiards is a game played on a table with multiple balls and a cue stick."

Neither do some names of things having two parts:

pants, scissors, trousers, tweezers
Note, however, that these words are interchangeable with a pair of scissors, a pair of trousers, and so forth. Nor are scissor, trouser, tweezer, or pant the names of the individual parts. However, the fashion industry frequently calls a single pair of pants a pant; this is a back-formation. (See the Plural to singular by back-formation section below.) In addition, one half of a pair of scissors separated from the other half is, perhaps illogically, referred to as a half-scissor.

A compound that has a head at the beginning, particularly a legal term from French, commonly pluralizes its head: They don't have to be considered irregular, because an attorney general is a kind of attorney, not general, and a court martial is a kind of court, not martial. It is common in informal speech to pluralize the last word in the usual way, but in edited prose, the forms given are preferred.

On the other hand, if a compound can be thought to have two heads, both of them are sometimes pluralized, especially when the first head has an irregular plural form:

Comment: agent provocateur is a French term: agent is a noun and provocateur is an adjective. In French, the adjective must agree with the noun, so when the noun becomes plural, so does the adjective. This is not an exception. It is just following the rules of the originating language.

See also the Plurals of headless nouns section below.

Mass nouns (or uncountable nouns) do not represent distinct objects, so the singular and plural semantics do not apply in the same way. Some examples:

goodness, idleness, wisdom, deceit, honesty, freshness
chemistry, geometry, surgery, biometrics, mechanics, optics, blues (in music)
antimony, gold, oxygen, equipment, furniture, species, distress, sand, water, air, information
Some mass nouns can be pluralized, but the meaning thereof may change slightly. For example, when I have two pieces of sand, I do not have two sands; I have sand. There is more sand in your pile, not more sands. But there could be many "sands of Africa" - either many distinct stretches of sand, or distinct types of sand of interest to geologists or builders, or simply the allusive sands of Africa.

It is rare to pluralize furniture in this way. Nor would information be so treated, except in the case of criminal informations, which are prosecutor's briefs similar to indictments.

There is only one class of atoms called oxygen, but there are several isotopes of oxygen, which might be referred to as different oxygens. In casual speech, oxygen might be used as shorthand for "oxygen atoms", but in this case it is not a mass noun, so it is entirely sensible to refer to multiple oxygens in the same molecule.

One would interpret "Bob's wisdoms" as various pieces of Bob's wisdom (that is, pieces of advice), deceits as a series of instances of deceitful behavior, and the different idlenesses of the worker as plural distinct manifestations of the mass concept of idleness (or as different types of idleness, "bone lazy" versus "no work to do").

Nouns with multiple plurals

Some nouns have two plurals, one used to refer to a number of things considered individually, the other to refer to a number of things collectively. In some cases, one of the two is nowadays archaic or dialectal. Note a: Childer has all but disappeared, but can still be seen in Childermas (Innocents' Day). Note b: Kine is still used in rural English dialects. Note c: Dies is used as the plural for die in the sense of a mould; dice as the plural (and increasingly as the singular) in the sense of a small random number generator. "Dice" is also the accepted plural form of die in the semiconductor industry. Note d: Fish: the plural for one species of fish, or caught fish, is fish, but for live fish of many species, or in poetic usage, fishes is used. Note e: If you have several (British) one-penny pieces you have several pennies. Pence is used for an amount of money, which can be made up of a number of coins of different denominations: one penny and one five-penny piece are together worth six pence. Penny and pennies also refer to one or more U.S. one-cent pieces. But in American usage, a nickel is worth five cents, not five pence, though a penny is worth one cent (not plural). Note f: For multiple plants, iris is used, but irises is used for multiple blossoms. Note g: Clothes refers collectively to all of the cloth covering a person's body.

A final odd case is person. The word people is usually treated as the suppletive plural of person (one person, many people). However, in legal and other formal contexts, the plural of person is persons; furthermore, people can also be a singular noun with its own plural (for example, "We are many persons, from many peoples").

Plurals of symbols and abbreviations

Symbols and abbreviations whose plural would be ambiguous if only an s were added are pluralized by adding 's.

"mind your p's and q's"
Usage is divided on whether to extend this use of the apostrophe to non-ambiguous cases, such as the plurals of numbers (1990's) and words used as terms (his writing contains a lot of but's). Some writers use this form in a desire for consistency, whereas others say it confuses the plural with the possessive -'s.

Plurals of acronyms and initialisms

Acronyms and initialisms are generally used as if they are words. Clearly, one would tend not to pluralize the laser initialism as laser's. Thus the most consistent approach for pluralizing acronyms is likely to simply add a lowercase s as a suffix. This works well even for acronyms ending with an S, as in CASs (pronounced 'kazzes'), while still making it possible to use the possessive form ('s) for acronyms without confusion.

The traditional style of pluralizing single letters with 's (as explained above for symbols and abbreviations) was naturally extended to acronyms when they were commonly written with periods. This form is still preferred by some people for initialisms and thus the form using 's as a suffix is often seen in general usage.

Plurals of headless nouns

Linguist Steven Pinker, in his book, The Language Instinct discusses what he calls "headless words", typically bahuvrihis, like lowlife and Red Sox, where the life and sox are not heads semantically; that is, a lowlife is not a type of life, nor are Red Sox a kind of sock. Thus, more than one lowlife is lowlifes and a single member of the Boston baseball team is a Red Sox. Other examples include the Toronto ice-hockey team Maple Leafs, not Maple Leaves, sabertooth and sabertooths, flatfoot and flatfoots, tenderfoot and tenderfoots, still life and still lifes. An exception is Blackfoot, of which the plural can be Blackfeet.

Mouse is sometimes pluralized mouses when it refers to a computer mouse, although, in this case, mice is just as common because of the physical similarity between the input device and the rodent, which is the origin of the term.

Plural to singular by back-formation

Some words have started out with unusually formed singulars and plurals, but more "normal" singular-plural pairs have resulted by back-formation. For an example from the vegetable world, pease was the singular and peasen the plural, but over the centuries, first pease became the plural and pea the singular, and finally the plural was altered to peas. Similarly, termites and primates were the three-syllable plurals of termes and primas, respectively, but these singulars were lost, the plurals given two syllables, and now we have termite and termites and primate and primates. Syringe is a back-formation from syringes, itself the plural of syrinx, a musical instrument. Cherry is from Norman French cherise. Finally, phases was once the plural of phasis, but the singular is now phase.

Kudos is a singular Greek word meaning praise, but the same process may be happening to it. At present, kudo is an error, however. The name of the Greek sandwich style gyros is, increasingly, undergoing the same transformation. Gyros is from the Greek for "turning," but it looks like an English plural, and it is not uncommon to hear or see a reference to "a gyro".

The singular form of Spanish tamales (IPA: [ta ˈmal es]) is tamal ([ta ˈmal]). The anglicized version of tamales is pronounced [tə ˈmɑl iz] and the back-formed singular is tamale [(tə ˈmɑl i)].

Plurals of names of peoples

There are several different rules for this.

In discussing peoples whose demonym takes -man or -woman, there are three options: pluralize to -men or -women if referring to individuals, and use the root alone if referring to the whole nation, or add people. One can say "a Scots(wo)man" or "a Scot", "Scots(wo)men", "Scottish people", or "Scots," and "the Scottish" or "the Scots". (Scotch is considered old fashioned.)

Several peoples have names that are simple nouns and can be pluralized: Names of peoples that end in -ese take no plural: Neither do Swiss or Québécois.

Most names for Native Americans are not pluralized:

Ojibwa
Iroquois
Blood
Mi'kmaq
Some exceptions include Crees, Mohawks, Hurons, Algonquins, Chippewas, Oneidas, Aztecs. Note also the following words borrowed from Inuktitut: Names of most other peoples of the world are pluralized using the normal English rules.

Discretionary plurals

A number of words like army, fleet, Government, company, party, pack, crowd, mess, number, and majority, may refer either to a single entity or the members of the set that compose it. Thus, in British English they are "treated as singular or plural at discretion," as H.W. Fowler put it, who noted that occasionally a "delicate distinction" is made possible by discretionary plurals: "The Cabinet is divided is better, because in the order of thought a whole must precede division; and The Cabinet are agreed is better, because it takes two or more to agree" (A Dictionary of Modern English Usage, 2nd ed., revised by Sir Ernest Gowers [New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1965], p. 403). Also in British English, names of towns and countries take plural verbs when they refer to sports teams but singular verbs when they refer to the actual place: England are playing Germany tonight refers to a football game, but England is the most populous country of the United Kingdom refers to the country. In North American English, such words are invariably treated as singular.

Snob plurals

Another type of irregular plural occurs in the register of the English upper classes in the context of field sports, where the singular form is used in place of the plural, as in "a herd of antelope", "two lion" or "five pheasant". Eric Partridge in Usage & Abusage refers to these as "Snob Plurals" and conjectures that they may have developed by analogy with the common English irregular plural animal words "deer", "sheep" and "trout".

The term snob plurals can be applied more generally to uses of forms of pluralization characterized, first, by their departure from the standard English rule of adding -(e)s, and, second, by the likelihood they are being so used to enhance the status of the speaker. While speaking to a group of monolingual anglophone friends, someone talking about a recent trip to Russia who says, "We visited five oblasti," is most likely using a snob plural. The use of latinate plurals for nouns of Greek origin mentioned earlier in this article often are used as snob plurals--cacti or hipopotomi--although for many speakers this is simply the unmarked usage. The use of non-standard plurals can be one convenient way to communicate the claim that the speaker has greater knowledge, and therefore sophistication, than the interlocutor possesses. Because the pragmatics of this usage are heavily dependent on context, it's impossible to say that a particular use of pluarization is, or is not, a snob plural in the absence of information about the context of use. Someone speaking at a conference to colleagues who are Slavicists might use oblasti without the expectation of enhanced social status and, therefore, not using a snob plural. Articles in encyclopedias are, on the whole, written for the general reader and avoid forms of plural that would likely confuse those not already familiar with the topic.

External link

 


From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Original article here. Support Wikipedia by contributing or donating.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License See Wikipedia Copyrights for details.

Search Titles
0123456789
ABCDEFGHIJ
KLMNOPQRST
UVWXYZ?

E-mail this article to:

Personal Message: