Opentopia Directory Encyclopedia Tools

Finale (computer program)

Encyclopedia : F : FI : FIN : Finale (computer program)


right Finale is the flagship program of a series of scorewriters created by MakeMusic! for Microsoft Windows and Mac OS X.

Several less expensive versions of Finale, with subsets of the main program's features, are made. These include Finale NotePad, Finale NotePad Plus, Printmusic!, and Allegro. Two more such versions, Finale Guitar and Finale Songwriter, have feature sets tailored to different musicians' needs.

Operation

The default document is a 31-measure piece for a single treble clef instrument. A Setup Wizard, the preferred method of starting a score, consists of a set of dialogs to specify the instrumentation, time signature, key signature, pick-up measure, title and composer.

There is a Main Tool palette, and the right tool must be selected to work on a given score element, e.g., Smart Shape tool to work on trill lines and dynamics hairpins, Staff tool to work on staves. Also, there are four layers of music that can overlap. (The operation of Finale bears at least some surface similarities to Adobe Photoshop.) Each tool has an associated menu just to the left of the Help menu, available only when that particular tool is selected.

On the screen, Finale color codes some elements of the score as a visual aid, on the print-out all score elements are black. With the right tool selected, many adjustments are possible either by clicking and dragging or by entering measurements in a dialog box.

Finale 2004c under Mac OS X displaying the score of Robert Volkmann's Symphony No. 1 in D minor. The program color-codes some score elements on the screen.
Enlarge
Finale 2004c under Mac OS X displaying the score of Robert Volkmann's Symphony No. 1 in D minor. The program color-codes some score elements on the screen.

Finale automatically takes care of many of the more mechanical aspects of music notation, such as stem direction and alignment of different rhythmic values. For other things, the program makes a good guess, such as enharmonic spelling from a piano keyboard: it is smart enough to spell F-sharp rather than G-flat in a V/V chord in C minor, but some chords, for instance V+, it might understandably use G-flat instead of F-sharp.

Version history

The most advertised new feature of the latest version, Finale 2006 (released in the summer of 2005), is the Garritan Personal Orchestra, an integrated sound library with upgradeable selections from Garritan Personal Orchestra for more lifelike playback than the SmartMusic SoftSynth (which is still included in the program). In addition to Page View and Scroll View, the program now also has StudioView™, which is similar to Scroll View with the addition of a key sequencer which allows for creation, evaluation, and experimentation with different ideas in a multi-track environment. In StudioView, an additional staff shows up called TempoTap™, allowing for complete control over rubati, accelerandi, and ritardandi.

The lead programmer for Finale version 1.0 was Phil Farrand, better known in some circles as an author of Nitpicker's Guides for Star Trek and The X-Files. He wrote the software for Coda Music, which was later sold to Net4Music and then became MakeMusic!  After Finale version 3.0, marketing made the switch to years as identifiers for major versions, starting with Finale 97 (roughly corresponding with Microsoft Word 97).

Capabilities

Finale can notate anything from a textbook chorale to a cut-out score including new symbols invented by the composer. It is also capable of working with guitar tablature and includes a jazz font similar to that used in the Real Book. Virtually all score elements can be positioned or adjusted, either by dragging (with the appropriate tool selected) or by using dialog boxes with measurements in inches, centimeters or picas.

Music can be entered by playing on a MIDI instrument connected to the computer, typing pitches and durations on the computer keyboard, or by clicking with the mouse. Using the Hyperscribe tool, a piece may be played in tempo and Finale will attempt to transcribe it. It's also possible to play notes one at a time and use the computer keyboard to indicate durations. From Finale 2001 onward, the program included Mic Notator, a module able to notate pitches played on an acoustic instrument via a microphone connected to the computer. Although MIDI sequencing is not the program's primary purpose, newer versions can create MIDI files that take into account stylistic variances, such as Baroque dotted note interpretation.

Finale 2004 also introduced FinaleScript, a scripting language for the automation of tasks such as transcribing music for other instruments to use.

\"Lite\" versions

Several "lite" versions of Finale, each with a subset of Finale's features, are made.

Finale NotePad is a free version with extremely limited staff and notation capabilities. Finale NotePad Plus is the cheapest purchaseable version, adding the ability to save as a MIDI file. PrintMusic! is a more expensive and somewhat more robust version, and Allegro is a further superset of PrintMusic!.

Finale Guitar is a specialized version with Finale's full complement of tablature features, and Finale Songwriter has features needed by those writing scores with lyrics.

Prominent users

Finale is used by large publishers such as the Hal Leonard Corporation and by prestigious schools such the Juilliard School and Berklee College of Music. Academy Award-winning movies such as Million Dollar Baby, The Aviator, Spider-Man 2, Sideways, Polar Express, The Village, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, The Passion of the Christ and Finding Neverland were all scored with Finale.

Criticisms and known issues

Although giving great control over a score, the abundance of features and dialog boxes with measurements is a double-edged sword, as it can make Finale less than straightforward to use. This has led to Finale's reputation for having a "high learning curve". In the face of competition from the well-known program Sibelius, claimed by its supporters to be renowned for its ease of use, recent versions of Finale have attempted to address this difference. Many users of Finale believe it to be better oriented toward music and easier to use than Sibelius, while others criticize it as being more oriented toward music engravers and less toward composers.

These are some of the most common problems users run into when using Finale, which contribute to its less-than-inviting reputation:

See also

External links

 


From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Original article here. Support Wikipedia by contributing or donating.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License See Wikipedia Copyrights for details.

Search Titles
0123456789
ABCDEFGHIJ
KLMNOPQRST
UVWXYZ?

E-mail this article to:

Personal Message: