Opentopia Directory Encyclopedia Tools

Ford Pinto

Encyclopedia : F : FO : FOR : Ford Pinto


The Ford Pinto was an American subcompact car manufactured by the Ford Motor Company, first introduced in 1971, and built through the 1980 model year. Like many Ford cars, it had a "twin": in the Pinto's case, the Mercury Bobcat, introduced in Canada in 1974 and then in the U.S. for 1975. Introduced in the same time frame as the Chevrolet Vega and AMC Gremlin, the Pinto was the most successful of the U.S. designs, and was the basis for the upcoming Mustang II.

For many years Ford had sold small models from its British line as captive imports, including the Ford Cortina. The Pinto's design began in 1968 under the direction of Ford executive Lee Iacocca. The Pinto was replaced by the Escort for the 1981 model year.

Body styles included a 2-door coupe, a three-door hatchback, a two-door station wagon, and the Ford Pinto Cruising Wagon, produced from 1977 to 1980 and styled to resemble a small conversion van (very much the trend in the late 1970s) complete with a round "bubble window" in the side panels.

The car's design was conventional, with unibody construction, a longitudinally-mounted engine in front driving the rear wheels through either a manual or automatic transmission and live axle rear end. Suspension was by unequal length A-arms with coil springs at the front and the live axle rear was suspended on leaf springs. The rack and pinion steering had optional power assist, as did the brakes. Seating was very low to the floor, and styling somewhat resembled the larger Ford Maverick in grille and tail light themes.

Road & Track faulted the suspension and standard drum brakes, calling the latter a "serious deficiency". But they praised the 1.6 L Kent engine, especially compared to the much-larger 2300 found in arch-rival Chevrolet Vega.

Original engines included a British-built 1.6 L OHV I4 and a German-built 2.0 L SOHC I4. In 1974, the 1.6 L powerplant was dropped and a new 2.3 L engine became available; a 2.8 L V6 was available from 1975.

Engines

Safety problems

Through early production of the model, it became a focus of a major scandal when it was alleged that the car's design allowed its fuel tank to be easily damaged in the event of a rear-end collision which sometimes resulted in deadly fires and explosions. Critics argued that the vehicle's lack of a true rear bumper as well as any reinforcing structure between the rear panel and the tank, meant that in certain collisions, the tank would be thrust forward into the differential, which had a number of protruding bolts that could puncture the tank. This, and the fact that the doors could potentially jam during an accident (due to poor reinforcing) made the car a potential deathtrap.

Ford was allegedly aware of this design flaw but refused to pay what was characterized as the minimal expense of a redesign. Instead, it was argued, Ford decided it would be cheaper to pay off possible lawsuits for resulting deaths. Mother Jones magazine obtained the cost-benefit analysis Ford had used to compare the cost of an $11 repair against the cost of paying off potential law suits. The characterization of Ford's design decision as gross disregard for human lives in favor of profits led to major lawsuits, inconclusive criminal charges, and a costly recall of all affected Pintos. Ford lost several million dollars and gained a reputation for manufacturing "the barbecue that seats four."

The cynical way of calculating costs of settlements against the costs of a recall is thematized in the novel Fight Club and its movie adaption, but economists note that cost-benefit analysis is the only possible way of measuring whether safety measures are worthwhile. For example, all automobiles would be safer if they were limited to go no faster than fifteen miles per hour, but they would be far less useful or desirable in such circumstances, so that safety measure is not taken, even though thousands of lives a year are lost as a result.

The most famous Ford Pinto product liability case resulted in a judicial opinion that is a staple of remedies courses in American law schools. In Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co., 119 Cal. App. 3d 757 (4th Dist. 1981) [link], the California Court of Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District reviewed Ford's conduct in painstaking detail, and upheld compensatory damages of $2.5 million and punitive damages of $3.5 million against Ford. It also upheld the judge's reduction of the punitive damages from the jury's original verdict of $125 million. Of the two plaintiffs, one was killed in the collision that caused her Pinto to explode, and her passenger, 13-year old Richard Grimshaw, was badly burned and scarred for life.

More recently, it has been argued (in a well-known 1991 law review paper by Gary Schwartz [link], among others) that the case against the Pinto was less clear-cut than commonly supposed. Only 27 people ever died in Pinto fires. Given the Pinto's production figures (over 2 million built), this was no worse than typical for the time, and far less than the "hundreds" claimed by the consumer safety advocates whose allegations are largely responsible for the reputation of the vehicle. Schwartz argues that the car was no more fire-prone than other cars of the time, and that the supposed "smoking gun" document showing Ford's callousness actually referred to the auto industry in general rather than the Pinto specifically.

Due to the alleged engineering, safety, and reliability problems, Forbes Magazine included the Pinto on its list of the worst cars of all time. Ironically Ford had originally planned to include an inexpensive rubber bladder inside the gas tank that would have prevented most of the explosive crashes that plagued the car's run; in addition, Ford had also planned to include revolutionary dual front air bags. The addition of these two safety features would have added a few hundred dollars to the $2000 base price of the vehicle but would have probably made it a much safer vehicle. However, it is quite possible Ford would not have sold over two million of the modified car due to the substantial increase in price and may or may not have made less profit. The Pinto was once referred to as "the car nobody loved, but everybody bought".

Marketing

The Pinto's competition included not only rival U.S. built models, but the Toyota Corolla, Datsun 510 and other similar small Japanese cars. In measures of quality, durability, economy, value, and performance, the Pinto compared poorly to these lighter vehicles. Ford's marketing response was to emphasize the vehicle as having "…more road-hugging weight".

Pinto Pangra

A Pinto Pangra.  The same car is also visible in the background in the first picture in this article.
Enlarge
A Pinto Pangra. The same car is also visible in the background in the first picture in this article.

The Pinto Pangra was a modified, sporting Pinto produced in limited numbers by a Ford dealer, Huntington Ford in Arcadia, California. Approximately 200 were sold during 1973 and (to a limited degree) 1974, and in addition the components were sold in kit form. A Pangra cost approximately $5,000.

The most visible modification was a slanted fiberglass nose with pop-up headlights. Internally, the stock 2 liter engine was fitted with an AK Miller turbocharger; a "Can-Am" suspension package with Koni dampers lowered the car and improved the handling; aluminum wheels with wider tires were fitted, as were Recaro seats, a revised dash with a new center console, full instrumentation, and a digital tachometer.

In popular culture

The Pinto, along with the Yugo, AMC Gremlin, AMC Pacer, suffers the reputation of being an American symbol for a "cheap economy car" or "cheapness", and the Pinto has made its way into popular culture because of this. Also, its reputation for being unsafe is frequently lampooned. Examples include:

See also

References

External links

Ford Motor Company
Platforms | Engines | Vehicles |
Current/Future:
Cars: Activa | Crown Victoria/Police Interceptor | Fairlane | Falcon/FPV models | Fiesta | Five Hundred | Focus/C-MAX | Freestar | Freestyle | Fusion (European)/EcoSport | Fusion (North American) | Galaxy | GT | Ikon | Ka | Laser/Lynx/Tierra | Mondeo/Metrostar | Mustang | Sportka | Streetka |
Trucks/SUVs: Cargo | Courier (Brazilian)/Bantam | E-Series/Chateau Wagon | Econovan | Edge | Escape/Hybrid | Expedition | Explorer | Everest/Endeavour | F-Series (includes Super Duty) | Pronto | Ranger/Courier | Territory | Tourneo | Tourneo Connect | Transit | Transit Connect | Van (Taiwanese)
Historic:
1900s: Model A/AC | Model B | Model C | Model F | Model K | Model N | Model R | Model S | Model T
1910s-1920s: Model TT | Model A
1930s-1940s: Model B | Köln | CX | Rheinland | Eifel | 7Y | Anglia | Prefect | Country Squire | Meteor | Pilot
1950s: Consul | Country Sedan | Del Rio | Edsel (Brand) | Fairlane | Galaxie | Mainline | Parklane | Popular | Ranchero | Squire | Taunus | Thunderbird | Versailles | Zephyr
1960s: Bronco | Capri | Corcel | Corsair | Cortina | Escort | Falcon (North American) | GT40 | LTD | Torino
1970s: Elite | Fairmont | Granada | Maverick | Pinto
1980s: Aerostar | Bantam | Bronco II | Del Rey | EXP | Festiva | Laser | LTD Crown Victoria | Orion | Probe | Scorpio | Sierra | Taurus | Telstar | Tempo | Verona
1990s: Aspire | Contour | Cougar | Maverick | Puma | Windstar
2000s: Excursion | Ford GT | Thunderbird

[http://encycl.opentopia.com/ edit template]

 


From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Original article here. Support Wikipedia by contributing or donating.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License See Wikipedia Copyrights for details.

Search Titles
0123456789
ABCDEFGHIJ
KLMNOPQRST
UVWXYZ?

E-mail this article to:

Personal Message: