Opentopia Directory Encyclopedia Tools

Gnosticism in modern times

Encyclopedia : G : GN : GNO : Gnosticism in modern times


Part of a series on
Gnosticism

History of Gnosticism
Persian Gnosticism
Mandaeism
Manichaeism
Syrian-Egyptic Gnosticism
Sethians
Thomasines
Valentinians
Basilideans
Fathers of Christian Gnosticism
Simon Magus
Cerinthus
Marcion
Valentinius
Early Gnosticism
Ophites
Cainites
Carpocratians
Borborites
Thomasines
Mediaeval Gnosticism
Paulicianism
Bogomils
Cathars
Gnosticism in modern times
Gnosticism in popular culture
Gnostic texts
Nag Hammadi Library
Codex Tchacos
Gnosticism and the New Testament
Related Articles
Gnosis
Pythagoreanism
Neoplatonism and Gnosticism
Esoteric Christianity
Theosophy
This box: [ view] • [ talk] • [ edit]

Gnosticism includes a variety of ancient religions prevalent in the Mediterranean in the third century CE. Prior to the 20th century, little was known about the various Gnostic movements, due to paucity of original material available to scholars and the public. Since the emergence of the Nag Hammadi library in 1945, and its translation into English and other modern languages in 1977, Gnosticism has undergone something of a rapid dissemination, and has as a result had observable influence on several modern figures, and upon modern Western culture in general. This article attempts to summarise those modern figures and movements that have been influenced by Gnosticism, both prior and subsequent to the Nag Hammadi discovery.

Scholars of Gnosticism and those influenced by it

There follows a list of those figures who are known to have undertaken a study of Gnosticism, and who have occasionally incorporated elements of Gnostic systems into their own work, or whose own work subsequently contains recognizably Gnostic traits. All figures and movements, as throughout the article, are organised alphabetically: individuals are organised by surname, while groups are organised by title. Thus, both "Jules Doinel" and "Ecclesia Gnostica" precede "René Guénon" in the listing. Where two or more figures are discussed (for example, in the case of co-authorship of a text), listing is based on the first surname alphabetically.

Samael Aun Weor

Between 1950 and 1977, Samael Aun Weor wrote some seventy books about Gnosis and Gnosticism, explaining the universal basis of all religions in Kabbalistic and Alchemical terms. Perhaps the most dramatic is The Pistis Sophia Unveiled, a 650-page revelation of the long-debated Gnostic scripture. His works are only recently becoming available in English, although his schools count their students in the millions.

Madame Blavatsky

Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, founder of Theosophy, wrote extensively on Gnostic ideas. These are discussed in her biographical article and the article on her philosophy.

Aleister Crowley

Aleister Crowley's Thelema system is influenced by and thus bears major features in common with Gnosticism, especially in the requirement that adherants work to arrive at their own direct knowledge (or 'gnosis') of the divine (this is referred to in the Thelemic system as the 'Great Work'). There are several Thelemic Gnostic organizations, including Ecclesia Gnostica Catholica as an ecclesiastical body and Ordo Templi Orientis as an initiatory body.

Hans Jonas

The philosopher Hans Jonas wrote extensively on Gnosticism, interpreting it from an existentialist viewpoint. For some time, his study The Gnostic Religion was widely held to be a pivotal work, and it is as a result of his efforts that the Syrian-Egyptian/Persian division of Gnosticism came to be widely used within the field.

Jung and Mead

Carl Jung and his associate G.R.S. Mead worked on trying to understand and explain the Gnostic faith from a psychological standpoint. Jung's "analytical psychology" in many ways schematically mirrors ancient Gnostic mythology, particularly those of Valentinus and the 'classic' Gnostic doctrine described in most detail in the Apocryphon of John (see gnostic schools).

Jung understands the emergence of the Demiurge out of the original, unified monadic source of the spiritual universe by gradual stages to be analogous to (and a symbolic depiction of) the emergence of the ego from the unconscious

However, it is uncertain as to whether the similarities between Jung's psychological teachings and those of the gnostics are due to their sharing a "perennial philosophy", or whether Jung was unwittingly influenced by the Gnostics in the formation of his theories. Jung's own 'gnostic hymn', the Septem Sermones ad Mortuos (Latin: "The Seven Sermons to the Dead"), would tend to imply the latter, but after circulating the manuscript, Jung declined to publish it during his lifetime. Since it is not clear whether Jung was ultimately displeased with the book or whether he merely suppressed it as too controversial, the issue remains contested.

Uncertain too are Jung's belief that the gnostics were aware of and intended psychological meaning or significance within their myths.

On the other hand, it is clear from a comparison of Jung's writings and that of ancient Gnostics, that Jung disagreed with them on the ultimate goal of the individual. Gnostics in ancient times clearly sought a return to a supreme, other-worldly Godhead. In a study of Jung, Robert Segal claimed that the eminent psychologist would have found the psychological interpretation of the goal of ancient Gnosticism (that is, re-unification with the Pleroma, or the unknown God) to be psychically 'dangerous', as being a total identification with the unconscious.

To contend that there is at least some disagreement between Jung and Gnosticism is at least supportable: the Jungian process of individuation involves the addition of unconscious psychic tropes to consciousness in order to achieve a trans-conscious centre to the personality. Jung did not intend this addition to take the form of a complete identification of the Self with the Unconscious.

Eric Voegelin

Eric Voegelin identified a number of similarities between the characteristics of ancient Gnosticism and those of a number of modern political theories, particularly Communism and Nazism. He identifies the root of the Gnostic impulse as alienation, that is, a sense of disconnectedness with society and a belief that this lack of concord between the individual and the wider community is the result of the inherent disorderliness or even the evil of the world.
This alienation has two effects. The first is the belief that the disorder of the world can be transcended by extraordinary insight, learning, or knowledge, called a 'Gnostic speculation' by Voegelin. The second is the desire to implement a policy to actualise the speculation, or, as Voegelin describes it, to "Immanentize the Eschaton": to create an, as it were, heaven on earth within history.
The totalitarian impulse is derived from the alienation of the proponents of the policy from the rest of society. This leads to a desire to dominate (libido dominandi) which has its roots not just in the conviction of the imperative of the Gnostic's vision but also in his or her lack of concord with a large body of society. As a result, there is very little regard for the welfare of those in society who are impacted by the resulting politics, which may range from coercive to calamitous in nature(cf. Stalin's nostrum: "You have to crack a few eggs to make an omelet").

This totalitarian impulse in modernism has been noted by Catholic writers, particularly in Henri de Lubac's work "The Drama of Atheist Humanism", which explores the connection between the totalitarian impulses of political Communism, Fascism and Positivism with their philosophical progenitors Hegel, Feuerbach, Marx, Comte and Nietzsche. Indeed, Voegelin acknowledges his debt to this book in creating his seminal essay "Science, Politics, and Gnosticism".
Evidence exists that later Voegelin came to regret the emphasis laid upon Gnosticism in his work, at the expense of not acknowledging other potentially negative influences on Western cultural and political development.

Voegelin's identification of Gnosticism as being best defined as opposition to the world (what he called "the gnostic attitude") has been criticised, as it led to a tendency for him to find Gnosticism in almost anything. Thus, Voegelin saw Gnosticism as the preeminent western philosophy since the middle ages, and the greatest threat to decency on earth. In fact, it would seem that in seeing the negative influence of Gnosticism in everything, and by so urgently suggesting a return to fundamentals, Voegelin too was guilty of the "gnostic attitude," and was indeed trying to "immanentize the eschaton" himself.

Contested Gnostic Influence

There follows a list of those whose influence by Gnosticism is contested, or is otherwise as yet unproven conclusively either way; also those whose work bears a structural or thematic resemblance to Gnosticism.

William Blake

William Blake, the nineteenth century Romantic poet and artist, was according to Gilchrist, his biographer, well-versed in the doctrines of the Gnostics, and his own personal mythology contains many points of cohesion with several Gnostic mythemes (for example, the Blakean figure of Urizen bears many resemblances to the Gnostic Demiurge). However, efforts to dub Blake a "Gnostic" have been complicated by the complex nature and colossal extent of Blake's own mythology, and the variety of myths and themes that are referred to as "Gnostic"; thus, the exact relationship between Blake and the Gnostics remains a point of scholarly contention, though a comparison of the two often reveals intriguing points of correspondence.

Friedrich Nietzsche

The philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche appears to echo Gnostic ideas in his concept of the "eternal return", in which a demon condemns human subjects to live out their lives in endless repeating cycles; this appears to bear resemblance to the Gnostic Archons, which rule the world and impede the spirit's progression beyond it.

Modern gnostic 'revivals'

Gnosticism in popular culture

Gnosticism has seen something of a resurgence in popular culture in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. This may be related, certainly, to the sudden availability of Gnostic texts to the reading public, following the emergence of the Nag Hammadi library.

Modern gnostic mysticism

Gnostic believers today retain much of the , in particular that These doctrines are well explained by Dutch gnostic scholar and Rosicrucian [Jan van Rijckenborgh].

Other developments might be said to include relation of Gnostic mysticism to information theory and Digital Philosophy, such as in writings about TechGnosticism (Erik Davis), Infomysticism (Steve Mizrach, [link]), and possibly Rupert Sheldrake's holarchy of morphic fields.

External links

All external links are given in alphabetical order by page title or, where available, by author. If you wish to add to the lists, please maintain this layout.

 


From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Original article here. Support Wikipedia by contributing or donating.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License See Wikipedia Copyrights for details.

Search Titles
0123456789
ABCDEFGHIJ
KLMNOPQRST
UVWXYZ?

E-mail this article to:

Personal Message: