Hephthalite
Encyclopedia : H : HE : HEP : Hephthalite
The Hephthalites, also known as White Huns, were an Indo-European and quite possibly an Eastern Iranian nomadic people who lived across western China, Central Asia, Afghanistan, Pakistan and northwest India in the fourth through sixth centuries AD. The term Hephthalite derives from Greek, supposedly a rendering of Hayathelite (from the term Haital = "Big/Powerful" in the dialect of Bukhara), the name used by Persian writers to refer to a 6th century empire on the northern and eastern periphery of their land. As a group they appear to be distinct from the Huns who ravaged Europe in the fourth century AD.
Name
In China, they were known as Yanda (厌哒 or 嚈噠), also written Yedaiyiliduo/Yeda/Yeoptal, but are documented as having called themselves Hua or Huer (滑), chroniclers recognising that the Chinese Yoptal terms actually came from the name of the Hua leaders. Peoples with similar ethnicons had been present in Central Eurasia for centuries. The Chinese classic Liang Zhigongtu describes them as of the same origin as the Hua Country. Yanda has been given various latinised renderings such as "Yeda", although the Korean pronunciation "Yeoptal" 엽달 is much more recognisable and is certainly a much more archaic form. The later name Hephthal, which some sources indicate originally applied to one of the 5 Yuezhi families from Kushan, is supposed to have been a name derived from their ruling élite.Procopius called them "White Huns" while Simokattes calls them Uar (reminiscent of their own self-designation) and identifies them as the "real" Avars of the east and the true political force behind what he calls the "pseudo" Avars who eventually settled down in Transylvania.
Different spellings include Ephthalite, Epthalite, Ephtalite, Eptalite, Hepthalite, Hephtalite, and Heptalite.
India knew the Hephthalites by the Sanskrit name Hūna (svetahuna i.e. White Huns)(perhaps used originally to refer to the Xiyonites?). It has been said that their legendary ancestor was Afrasiabus. Armenian sources also mention a White Hun origin for the Parthian Arsaces. According to Simokattes, Alchoni were also a part of their composition, having united under the Yoptal with the "vulturous" Uar around AD 460.
Expansion
Throughout the 5th century, it was the Huer who managed to succeed to the Central Eurasian Hun heritage in a campaign which spread from the Tian Shan to the Carpathians. After the failure of Xiong's Zhou County (352) the influence of the Huer Dragon Tribe
Some sources #redirect indicate that one branch of the Juan Juan was called Uar or Var(?), and they were placed at the head of the Uyghurs after Juan Juan subjugation in 460
Chinese sources mention a "king" called Yedaiyiliduo 厌带夷栗陁 (perhaps rather the name of the dynasty than a single man) from 516, indicating the Hephthalite family had come to rule them in Xinjiang by this time. Sometime during Ye-Tai-Yi-Li-Tuo's reign (507-531), those Huer and Alchoni
The Eastern Huer or Hephthalite
References to eastern "Avars" in control of Uyghuristan from 541-565 concern them. This was during the reign of the Hephthal Toramana II, though they had a presence in Xinjiang under his predecessor Yedaiyiliduo (507-531)
Hephthalites in South Asia
The Hephthalites, or Huna as they were known in India, established themselves in Afghanistan and Pakistan by the first half of the fifth century, with their capital at Bamiyan.
The Indian emperor Skandagupta repelled a Hūna invasion in 455, but the Hephthalites continued to pressure India's northwest frontier (present day Pakistan), and broke through into northern India by the end of the fifth century, hastening the disintegration of the Gupta empire. They made their capital at the city of Sakala (modern day Sialkot) under their Emperor Mihirakula (or MehrGul meaning sunflower).
After the end of the sixth century little is recorded in India about the Hephthalites, and what happened to them is unclear; some historians surmise that the remaining Hephthalites were assimilated into northern India's population.
Origin Theories
K. Enoki believed them to be an Iranian group, like the Tajiks today, while some of their practices remind us of Khwarezmia, in which case they may have belonged to other speakers of Indo-European languages, perhaps the Tocharians. There were various theories about their origins documented by contemporary Chinese chroniclers as with Procopius.
- They were related in some way to the Visha (Indo-Europeans known to the Chinese as the Yuezhi or Yüeh Chih),
- They were a branch of the Kao-ch`e,
- They were descendants of the general Pahua,
- They were descendants of Kang Chu
- Their origins cannot be made clear at all.
See also
References
Enoki, K. "The Liang shih-kung-t'u on the origin and migration of the Hua or Ephthalites," Journal of the Oriental Society of Australia 7:1-2 (December 1970):37-45External links
- [The Ethnonym Apar in the Turkish Inscriptions of the VIII. Century and Armenian Manuscripts - Mehmet Tezcan] (pdf)
- [Hephthalite coins]
- [Hephthalite History and Coins of the Kashmir Smast Kingdom- Waleed Ziad]
- [The Hephthalites of Central Asia - by Richard Heli] (long article with a timeline)
- [The Hephthalites] Article archived from the University of Washington's Silk Road exhibition - has a slightly adapted form of the Richard Heli timeline.
From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Original article here. Support Wikipedia by contributing or donating.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License See Wikipedia Copyrights for details.
