History of the Supreme Court of Canada
Encyclopedia : H : HI : HIS : History of the Supreme Court of Canada
|
|
of Canada |
|---|
| The Court |
| History · Act · Process |
| Current members |
| Beverley McLachlin |
| Michel Bastarache · Ian Binnie |
| Louis LeBel · Marie Deschamps |
| Morris Fish · Rosalie Abella |
| Louise Charron · Marshall Rothstein |
| All members |
| Past Chief Justices · Past Puisne Justices |
| by Court composition |
| Decisions |
| Richards Court through Fauteux Court |
| Laskin Court · Dickson Court |
| Lamer Court · McLachlin Court |
| By author |
| [edit this template] |
Origins
With the formation of the Dominion of Canada in 1867 there was a growing movement to create a final court of appeal for the new country. John A. Macdonald, along with Télesphore Fournier, Alexander Mackenzie, and Edward Blake championed the creation of a Supreme Court. However, those strongly loyal to the English tradition opposed it and managed to get bills withdrawn in both 1869 and 1870. Additionally, there was resistance from Quebec until the Guibord case demonstrated to them that JCPC cases could not always be sensitive to their religious culture. It was not until April 8, 1875 that the bill was finally passed.Initially, there were only six judges on the Supreme Court. This eventually resulted in several even split decisions, and it was eventually increased to seven in 1921. It was not until 1949, with the abolition of appeals to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, that there was a full compliment of nine judges.
The Court was inaugerated on November 18, 1875. Initially they sat in the Railway Committee room inside of the Parliament. They would move around into several vacant rooms until 1882 when they were relocated to a newly renovated building at the entrance of Parliament that used to be a carriage house. It would not be until 1949 where they would be relocated to the Court house where they preside today.
The Court's very first sitting was on January 17th, but since there were no cases to be heard they adjourned until spring. That April the Court was given a reference question from the Canadian Senate (In Re "The Brothers of the Christian Schools in Canada"). The Senate wanted to know if a bill entitled "An Act to incorporate the Brothers of the Christian Schools in Canada" was constitutional and within the authority of the federal government. Only Ritchie, Strong, and Fournier JJ. were in attendance, each only giving a short judgement. It was not until June that the Court heard its first case with Kelly v. Sullivan.
Under the Privy Council
In the early days the Supreme Court was not the court of last resort for cases: all cases could be appealed to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in London. As well, cases could bypass the Court and go directly to London from the provincial courts of appeal. The decisions of the Supreme on the interpretation of the Constitution tended to support the popular view that it was intended to create a powerful central government. The Privy Council, however, held a distinctly opposite view of the Constitution as providing for strong provincial powers [#endnote_pogg]. The decisions of Lords Haldane and Watson strongly reflected this view in their decisions which became increasingly unpopular. In many of their decisions they interpreted the Trade and Commerce power as well as the peace, order and good government power of the federal government to be exceptionally limited. Many of these decisions had the result of striking down a number of reforms proposed by both the Conservative Government of R. B. Bennett and the following Liberal government of MacKenzie King, despite public support. Consequently, provincial governments began to demand the federal government press the UK for judicial independence. The Supreme Court of Canada formally became the court of last resort for criminal appeals in 1933 and for all other appeals in 1949.Laskin Court
The appointment of Laskin as Chief Justice in 1973 represented a major turning point for the Court. Many of the Laskin Court justices were either academics or well respected practicioners, most had several years experience in appellate courts. Laskin's federalist and liberal views were an influence in many of the Court's decisions.Dickson Court
The beginning of the Dickson Court corresponds with the first of the Charter cases heard by the Supreme Court. The Charter casesLamer Court
Lamer's criminal law background proved an influence on the number of criminal cases heard by the Court during his time as Chief Justice. Nonetheless, the Lamer Court was more conservative with Charter rights, with only about 1 % success rate for Charter claimant.McLachlin Court
The appointment of McLachlin as Chief Justice has resulted in a more centrist and unified Court. Dissenting and concurring opinions are fewer than they were during the Dickson and Lamer Courts.References
- McCormick, P., "Supreme At Last. The Evolution of the Supreme Court of Canada" (Toronto: James Lorimer & Company Ltd., 2000).
External links
- [origins of the SCC]
- [history of the Duff Court]
- [Charter trends of the Supreme Court of Canada]
- [statistics of case intake from 1994 - 2004]
From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Original article here. Support Wikipedia by contributing or donating.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License See Wikipedia Copyrights for details.