Hypostatic Union
Encyclopedia : H : HY : HYP : Hypostatic Union
| Part of a series on Christian theology | |
| |
|
Foundations Christianity · Holy Bible Jesus Christ · Holy Trinity History of Christianity · Timeline Ecumenical Councils · Creeds Great Schism · Reformation | |
|
Major Traditions Eastern Christianity Eastern Orthodoxy · Oriental Orthodoxy Syriac Christianity Western Christianity Roman Catholicism · Protestantism Thomism · Anabaptism · Lutheranism Anglicanism · Calvinism · Arminianism Baptist · Evangelicalism · Restorationism Liberalism · Fundamentalism Pentecostalism · Ecumenism | |
|
Important Figures Twelve Apostles · Apostle Paul Church Fathers · Athanasius · Augustine Palamas · Aquinas Luther · Calvin · Wesley | |
|
Key Points Fall of Man · Divine Law · Divine Grace Salvation · Justification · Sanctification Theosis · The Church · The Future | |
- For other uses of "", see {{{1.
Hypostatic union is a theological term used with reference to the Incarnation to express the revealed truth that in Christ one person (υπόστασις, hypostatis) subsists in two natures (φúσεις, physeis); the divine and the human. Hypostasis means, literally, "that which stands beneath"; as the basis or foundation. It thus came to be used by the Greek philosophers to denote reality as distinguished from mere appearance (Aristotle, "Mund.", IV, 21). It occurs also in Saint Paul's Epistles (II Corinthians 9:4; 11:17; Hebrews I, 3:III, 14), but not in the sense of a person. Previous to the Council of Nicaea (325), the term hypostasis was sometimes synonymous with ousia (Οὐσία), and even St. Augustine (De Trin., V, 8) declared that he saw no difference between them. The distinction was in fact brought about gradually in the course of the controversies to which the Christological heresies gave rise and was definitively established by the Council of Chalcedon (451), which declared that in the Christ there are two natures; each retaining its own properties, and together united in one subsistence and in one single person (εις εν πρόσωπον καὶ μίαν ὑπόστασιν, eis en prosopon kai mian hupostasin) (Denzinger, ed. Bannwart, 148). The two natures are not joined in a moral or accidental union (Nestorius), nor commingled (Eutyches), but nevertheless they are substantially united. The precise nature of this union is held to defy human comprehension, hence the alternative term "mystical union."
See also
From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Original article here. Support Wikipedia by contributing or donating.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License See Wikipedia Copyrights for details.
