Isaiah 53
Encyclopedia : I : IS : ISA : Isaiah 53
| Isaiah 53 "The Suffering Servant" (KJV)
52:13 Behold, my servant shall deal
52:14As many were astonied at thee;
52:15So shall he sprinkle many nations;
1Who hath believed our report?
2For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant
4Surely he hath borne our griefs,
5But he [was] wounded
6All we like sheep have gone astray;
7He was oppressed, and he was afflicted,
8He was taken from prison and from judgment:
10Yet it pleased the LORD to bruise him;
11He shall see of the travail of his soul,
12Therefore will I divide him [a portion] |
Isaiah 53, taken from the Book of Isaiah, is the last of the four Songs of the Suffering Servant, and tells the story of "The Suffering Servant". The passage is famous for its interpretation by some Christians to be prophesy of the coming of Jesus, being written over 700 years before his birth. Not suprisingly, this interpretation is strongly rejected by Jewish theologians. Many Christians view the entire chapter, and particularly this passage to refer to the suffering Jesus faced as well as the absolution of sins believed to be made possible by his death.
- 5But he was pierced for our transgressions,
- he was crushed for our iniquities;
- the punishment that brought us peace was upon him,
- and by his wounds we are healed.
The Israel theory
Citing a number of Bible verses that refer to Israel as the "servant",[Isaiah 41:8]-[9], [Isaiah 44:1], [[Isaiah 44:21], and [Isaiah 49:3] many scholars, particularly Jewish Scholars, have argued that the "servant" in question is actually Israel. Scholars also argue that verse 10 is inconsistent with the actual life of Jesus. The verse states that the servant will live a long life and have many children, which, when taken literally, contradicts the short, childless life of Jesus.- 10he shall see [his] seed, he shall prolong [his] days
Arguments against the \"Israel\" theory
Christians argue that the "servant" could not have been Israel because of Scriptural contradictions that would arise. Primarily, the Servant is described as "innocent and guiltless", but Isaiah 1:4 declares Israel to be "...a people laden with iniquity. A brood of evildoers, children who are corrupters!" In addition, Christians argue that if the "servant" were Israel, verse 10 ("It pleased the LORD to bruise him") would thereby be illogical because it entails God enjoying the sufferings of his people (whereas the suffering of Jesus would ultimately mean an absolution of sin and victory for mankind). It has also been argued that Israel, even through all of its suffering and torment can not have "atoned" for the sins of mankind. Christian theologians also point out that the verse 10 is not to be taken literally, where the "children" referred to are the Church, and the "long life" refers to the Resurrection.See also
Notes and references
External links
- [A Jewish refutation of Christian interpretation]
- [Why the Suffering Servant cannot be Israel, but must be the Messaiah]
- [One Christian's interpretation of Isaiah 53]
- [[A Christian examination of Isaiah 53]
From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Original article here. Support Wikipedia by contributing or donating.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License See Wikipedia Copyrights for details.
