About Opentopia
Opentopia Directory Encyclopedia Tools

Ken Ham

Encyclopedia : K : KE : KEN : Ken Ham

For the American astronaut, see Kenneth Ham.
Ken Ham
Ken Ham

Kenneth Alfred Ham (b. October 20, 1951) is the president of Answers in Genesis USA and Joint CEO of Answers in Genesis International. He is a well-known young Earth creationist.

Contents

Biography

Ham was born in Queensland, Australia but moved to the United States of America in 1987.

He has a bachelor's degree in applied science (with an emphasis on environmental biology) from the Queensland Institute of Technology. He also holds a Diploma of Education from the University of Queensland. Jerry Falwell, a Baptist preacher and chancellor of the Baptist Liberty University, granted Ham an honorary doctorate of literature.

He is married to Marilyn ("Mally") whom he describes as a "very, very submissive, supportive wife" and they have five children.Interview with Ken Ham by Ron Cooper[link] Two are married, and two live with them in Cincinnati. Ham has three grandchildren.

Between 1987 and 1993, Ham worked for the Institute for Creation Research (ICR), one of the oldest and most prominent American Creationist organizations. In 1994, he set up Answers in Genesis, a Christian ministry devoted to convincing people that Genesis should be taken as literally true, historically correct and scientifically accurate in every detail.

Beliefs

A young Earth creationist, Ham believes that the entire universe was created about 6,000 years ago and that Noah's flood occurred about 4,500 years ago. Although rejecting Darwin's Theory of Evolution and its modern variations, Ham does accept that natural selection can give rise to a number of species from an original population, provided that all of these species are of the same kind (a term borrowed from Genesis 1:11 and elsewhere). This explains, he believes, how the small number of animals carried on the ark were able to produce the biological diversity seen today. He also believes that dinosaurs co-existed with modern humans and cites (a) the existence of cave paintings which contain depictions of unidentified large animals and (b) the biblical use of the word dragon which he believes is synonymous with the modern word dinosaur. His claim that the earth is about 6,000 years old is based upon his interpretation of a number of evidences, including the amount of Helium and other gases in the atmosphere, radiometric dating results which he believes are inaccurate or inconsistant, the current proximity of the Moon to the Earth, the amount of salt in the world's oceans, as well as other phenomena. In his public talks, he has used a photo of a fossilized hat found in a mine to support his claim that ancient fossils and artifacts can fossilize faster than many scientists believe. Stephanie Simon, Their Own Version of a Big Bang LA Times February 11, 2006 [link]

Furthermore, Ham believes that the existence of the Theory of Evolution has directly caused the rise of humanism, racism, eugenics, euthanasia, pornography, homosexuality, family breakup, abortion, and more. He believes that the Theory of Evolution and the text of the Bible are irreconcilable and, based upon this irreconcilability, that any acceptance of the Theory of Evolution constitutes a "compromise" which will cause people to question the accuracy of the text of the bible and the moral authority that he believes flows from it. Official biography on Answers in Genesis[link] Ham often holds speaking events at various churches around the nation, discussing the "relevancy of Genesis in today's world" and encouraging the religious to speak out in defense of the Bible.

Ham encourages children to "always trust God" over science when confronted with teachings that contradict what is recorded in the Bible.

"Boys and girls," Ham said. If a teacher so much as mentions evolution, or the Big Bang, or an era when dinosaurs ruled the Earth, "you put your hand up and you say, 'Excuse me, were you there?' Can you remember that?" 
The children roared their assent.


"Sometimes people will answer, 'No, but you weren't there either,' " Ham told them. "Then you say, 'No, I wasn't, but I know someone who was, and I have his book about the history of the world.' " He waved his Bible in the air.


"Who's the only one who's always been there?" Ham asked.


"God!" the boys and girls shouted.


"Who's the only one who knows everything?"


"God!"


"So who should you always trust, God or the scientists?"


The children answered with a thundering: "God!"



Radio Program

Answers…with Ken Ham is a radio program that is broadcast daily on over 1000 radio stations worldwide.Radio listing from Answers in Genesis[link]  Each 90 second broadcast features commentary by Ken Ham and presents opinions expressed on the Answers in Genesis website.  Archives of past broadcasts are available.  An extended BB radio interview with Ken Ham is archived in the external links, below.



Controversy and criticism


His arguments have not gained the acceptance of any mainstream scientific organization.  In particular, No Answers in Genesis lists specific criticisms of Ham's teachings on science. 


Advocates of creationism, such as Ham, have been criticized for presenting children with a false dichotomy between God and science/evolution. This was a prominent statement in the 2005 opinion in Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District.Kitzmiller v. Dover decision[link]


One particular criticism is that Ham seeks to debunk evolutionary theory by asking, "were you there"? Kenneth Ham, Were You There?[link] Talk.origins answers this question with a three point reply:

  1. "Yes, because 'there' is here. Events in the past leave traces that last into the present, and we can and do look at that evidence today."
  2. "If this response were a valid challenge to evolution, it would equally invalidate creationism and Christianity, since they are based on events that nobody alive today has witnessed."
  3. "A more useful and more general question is, 'How do you know?' If the person making a claim can not answer that question, you may consider the claim baseless (tentatively, as someone else may be able to answer). If the answer is subjective -- for example, if it rests on the person's religious convictions -- you know that the claim does not necessarily apply to anyone but that person. If you can not understand the answer, you probably have some studying to do. If you get a good answer, you know to take the claim seriously." Index to Creationist Claims, Claim CA221[link]


Education, awards, and honors



Bibliography




The Lie

Enlarge

The Lie










Notes and references





External links


Official and Pro-Ham



Critical of Ham


Journalism















 





From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Original article here. Support Wikipedia by contributing or donating.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License See Wikipedia Copyrights for details.














Search Titles









0123456789
ABCDEFGHIJ
KLMNOPQRST
UVWXYZ?










E-mail this article to:



Personal Message: