Low-energy vehicle

Encyclopedia : L : LO : LOW : Low-energy vehicle

---

A low-energy vehicle is any type of vehicle that uses less energy than a regular vehicle.

Contents

• 1 Motivation
• 2 Preconditions
• 3 Facts
• 4 Reality
• 5 See also
• 6 External links

Motivation

Standard for passenger cars in Europe is 175 CO₂ g/km which equals 6.6l diesel resp. 7.5 l gasoline per 100 km (36 - 31 MPG). It is not feasible to base transportation in the long run on such high energy consumption without provoking heavy access conflicts to oil reserves and/or environmental damages when trying to produce fuel from natural or other fossile sources. Today's best medium sized cars are consuming 4 l diesel/100 km (59 mpg) which equals 105 g/km. Some newer examples of efficient commercially available ICE-propelled vehicles:

• Citroen C3 Stop & Start 5.0 l Diesel/100 km (47 MPG)
• Honda Civic Hybrid 4.6 l/100 km (51 MPG)
• Honda Insight Hybrid 4.3 l/100 km (55 MPG)
• Toyota Prius (Hybrid) 4.2 l/100 km (56 MPG)

As targets for the development of vehicles propelled by fossil fuels two classes of Low-energy vehicles are proposed:

• Low-energy vehicles LEnV having 18.1-105 g CO₂/km
• Ultra-low-energy vehicles ULEnV below 18 g CO₂/km (approx. 10% of the usual 175 g CO₂/km )

That is a relative standard, of course, and will certainly change in the future. ULEnV will not be feasible with internal combustion engines only working with fossil fuels.

Preconditions

The high fuel economy is caused by

• lower parasitic masses (compared to the average load) causing low energy demand in transitional operation (stop and go operation in the cities) [= m_ \cdot a \cdot v }] where P stands for power, [m_] for the total vehicle mass, a for the vehicles acceleration and v for the vehicles velocity. Extreme masses will go down to 300 kg from today's 1100 kg to 1600 kg. 5 seaters of the sixties had 625 kg[link]. Given the high safety standards required nowadays 700 kg will be a minimum.

man in van

man without van

• low crossectional area and mirrors replaced by cameras causing very low drag losses especially when driven at higher speed [= A_ \cdot cw_ \cdot \frac ^2 \rho_} }] where F stands for the force, [}] for the crossectional area of the vehicle, [} ] for the density of the air and [}] for the relative velocity of the air (incl. wind). Two places in a back to back or in line arrangement drastically reduce the crossectional area down to 1 m². The drag factor may be as low as 1.16.
• low rolling resistance due to smaller and high pressure tires with optimised tread and low vehicle mass driving the rolling resistance [= \mu_ \cdot m_ }] where [}] stands for the rolling resistance factor and [}] for the vehicle mass. Advanced driver assistance and ABS prevent safety problems caused by the small tires.

Facts

Drag resistance for SUVs is at least (same drag coefficient) 30% higher and the acceleration force has to be 35% bigger compared to family sedans. This gives of 40% higher fuel consumptions (even when including parallel hybrid electric SUVs).

Reality

See also

• Green vehicle

External links

• [Shells ECO-marathon]
• [VW Lupo driven with 2.5 l/100 km in Australia 94 mpg U.S.]
• [Toyota ES3 2.7 l/100 km in the FIA ECO-Test 87 mpg]
• [Mitsubishi i-concept car tested at 3.8 l/100 km 62 mpg]
• [InsightCentral], encyclopedia featuring the measures shown for the Honda Insight
• [Loremo - Concept car presented at the Automobile Sallon Geneva 2006]
• [Jetcar 2.5l/100km]

From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Original article here. Support Wikipedia by contributing or donating.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License See Wikipedia Copyrights for details.