Max Stuart
Encyclopedia : M : MA : MAX : Max Stuart
Rupert Maxwell (Max) Stuart (c. 1932 - ) is an Australian Aborigine who was convicted of murder in 1959. His conviction was controversial, subject to several unsuccessful appeals and a Royal Commission, which upheld the verdict. Newspapers campaigned successfully against the death penalty being imposed. After serving his sentence, Stuart became an Arrernte elder and from 1998 - 2001 was the chairman of the Central Land Council. In 2002, a film was made about the Stuart case.
Early life
Stuart was born in 1932 at Jay Creek in the MacDonnell Ranges, 45 kilometres west of Alice Springs in the Northern Territory. It was a government settlement which for a time in the late 1920s and early 1930s included 45 children from a home named 'The Bungalow' (37 of whom were under the age of 12) temporarily housed in a corrugated shed with a superintendent and matron housed separately in two tents. Jay Creek was home to the Western Arrernte people. In 1937, Jay Creek was declared as one of three permanent camps or reserves for the Alice Springs Aboriginal population. It was intended a buffer between the semi-nomadic people living in far western regions and the more sophisticated inhabitants of Alice Springs and environs, in particular for the non-working, aged and infirm around Alice.
As a teenager Stuart had worked as a bare-knuckle boxer and for Jimmy Sharman's boxing tents. In late 1958, he was working on the sideshows of a travelling fun fair. He was mostly illiterate and had problems with alcohol.
In the late 1950s, Stuart had been convicted of indecently assaulting a nine-year-old girl in Cloncurry, Queensland. In that case, he confessed to police that he “knew this was wrong” but he did not “know any big women” and that when he had liquor he could not control himself.
The Stuart Case
On 20 December 1958, Mary Hattam, a nine-year-old girl, was raped and murdered near the South Australian town of Ceduna. After playing on the beaches between Ceduna and Thevenard she did not come home. Her parents alerted the police and a community-wide search took place. Hattam's body was found at midnight bloodied and mangled with her face smashed in. The local police brought in two 'blacktrackers' (Aboriginal Trackers) who then traced the crime to Stuart. The travelling funfair, "Fun Land Carnival", which Stuart was working with, was visiting the town at the time. Following his confession, Stuart was brought to trial in the Supreme Court of South Australia, with the case opening on 20 April 1959. The Judge presiding was Sir Geoffrey Reed, an experienced judge; Stuart's lawyer was J.D. O'Sullivan, assigned to him by the Law Society of South Australia.O'Sullivan advocated that police had forced Stuart into the confession, due to Stuart's poor command of the English language. However, the jury was unconvinced by the argument and Stuart was deemed guilty. In line with the law, Judge Reed sentenced Stuart to death on April 24 1959. Two appeals were filed and neither were successful, an appeal to the Privy Council in London failed.
A prison chaplain, Catholic priest Father Thomas Dixon was suspicious about the sophisticated language used in the alleged confession. Stuart could hardly speak or write English; his native language was Arrernte. The anthropologist Ted Strehlow, who had studied the Arrernte people of central Australia, also had doubts and was called as a witness in the case. Ken Inglis, then a lecturer at Adelaide University, wrote in July 1959 of the doubts of Father Dixon and Ted Strehlow in the Nation, a fortnightly magazine. There was further reporting on the case in the Sydney Morning Herald and then Adelaide afternoon newspaper, the News, took up the issue.
Royal Commission
In late 1959 a Royal Commission, the Royal Commission in Regard to Rupert Max Stuart, was convened by the South Australian government. The Commission was appointed to enquire into matters raised in statutory declarations regarding Stuart's movements, actions and intentions, Stuart's movements on 20 December 1958, why the information in the declarations was not raised to the Supreme Court or another authority before the declarations were made and the circumstances in which the declarations were obtained and made. The Commission concluded that Stuart's conviction was justified. However, the Playford Government commuted his sentence to life imprisonment.
Newspaper campaigns against death sentence
The News, edited by Rohan Rivett and owned by Rupert Murdoch, campaigned heavily against Stuart's death sentence. Because of the campaign through the News, Rivett, as editor, and the News were charged in 1960 with seditious and malicious libel, but were acquitted. A few weeks later Murdoch dismissed Rivett. Rivett had been Editor-in-Chief of the News since 1951. It has been suggested that in the 2002 film of the case, the role of Murdoch was magnified, and the part of his editor, Rivett, was minimalised. However, it was noted in the Royal Commission that Murdoch wrote editorials, headlines and posters for the campaign. Stuart says of Murdoch that "He done a good one in my case" and also "He wanted the truth, you know. I could see him out in the court. I was with the policemen; my lawyer told me it was him."
Imprisonment
Stuart was released on parole in 1973. He was in and out of gaol until 1984, when he was paroled for the sixth and final time from Adelaide's Yatala Labour Prison. During his time at Yatala prison Stuart learned proper English, became literate, began painting in watercolours and acquired other work skills. In between being returned to prison a number of times for breaches of his parole between 1974 and 1984, he married and settled at Santa Teresa, a Catholic mission south-east of Alice Springs.
Publications on the case
Books on the case were written by Ken Inglis, one of the first to publicise the doubts about the case, Sir Roderic Chamberlain, the Crown Prosecutor, and Father Thomas Dixon, the priest who raised concerns about Stuart's confession.Film: Black and White
The 2002 feature film Black and White was made about his case. The main cast was:
- Stuart's lawyer, David O'Sullivan played by Robert Carlyle
- Crown Prosecutor, Roderic Chamberlain played by Charles Dance
- O'Sullivan's partner, Helen Devaney played by Kerry Fox
- Father Tom Dixon played by Colin Friels
- Newspaper publisher, Rupert Murdoch played by Ben Mendelsohn
- Max Stuart played by David Ngoombujarra
Louis Nowra wrote the screenplay. The director was Craig Lahiff and Helen Leake and Nik Powell produced the film.
The film won an AFI award in 2003 for David Ngoombujarra as Best Actor in a Supporting Role.
The film's producer, Helen Leak has reported that Stuart's response to seeing the film was, ‘It ain’t half bad, but it’s a long time to wait between smokes’!
Significance of the case
Geoffrey Robertson QC said of the case:It was a dramatic and very important case because it alerted Australia to the difficulties that Aborigines, who then weren't even counted in the census, encountered in our courts. It alerted us to the appalling feature of capital punishment of the death sentence that applied to people who may well be innocent.
Indigenous politics
In 1985, Patrick Dodson, then director of the Central Land Council, appointed Stuart to a part-time job. This appointment transformed Stuart, giving him respect and gave rise to his successful rehabilitation. Stuart shared his knowledge of Aboriginal law and tradition, which he had gained from his grandfather as a youth, and become an Arrernte elder.
Stuart has subsequently become an active figure in Central Australian Aboriginal affairs, in particular with the Lhere Artepe native title organisation.
Stuart was chairman of the Central Land Council (CLC) from 1998 to 2001. In 2000, as chairman of the CLC, Stuart welcomed the Queen to Alice Springs and made a presentation to her. in September 2001, Stuart was cultural director of the Yeperenye Federation Festival. In 2004, Stuart was the Public Officer for the CANCA Aboriginal Corporation, a role derived from his employment with the Central Land Council.
References
- - includes a discussion of the case and town locations associated with the case.
Part of the series on Crime in Australia | ||
| Regional crime: | Timeline | Melbourne | Northern Territory | Western Australia | Sydney | |
|---|---|---|
| Australian law: | Courts | Criminal law | Law enforcement | |
| Australian people: | | | | | | |
| Australian prisons: | | | | | | | | | |
| International: | ||
From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Original article here. Support Wikipedia by contributing or donating.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License See Wikipedia Copyrights for details.
