Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics
Encyclopedia : M : MA : MAX : Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics
| Particle statistics |
|---|
| Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics |
| Bose-Einstein statistics |
| Fermi-Dirac statistics |
| Parastatistics |
| Anyonic statistics |
| Braid statistics |
| [edit] |
In statistical mechanics, Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics describes the statistical distribution of material particles over various energy states in thermal equilibrium, when the temperature is high enough and density is low enough to render quantum effects negligible. Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics are therefore applicable to almost any terrestrial phenomena for which the temperature is above a few tens of kelvins.
The expected number of particles with energy [\epsilon_i] for Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics is [N_i] where:
- [\frac = \frac } = \frac}]
- [N_i] is the number of particles in state i
- [\epsilon_i] is the energy of the i-th state
- [g_i] is the degeneracy of state i, the number of microstates with energy [\epsilon_i]
- μ is the chemical potential
- k is Boltzmann's constant
- T is absolute temperature
- N is the total number of particles
- :[N=\sum_i N_i\,]
- [\frac = \frac }= \frac}]
Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein statistics apply when quantum effects have to be taken into account and the particles are considered "indistinguishable". The quantum effects appear if the concentration of particles (N/V) ≥ nq (where nq is the quantum concentration). The quantum concentration is when the interparticle distance is equal to the thermal de Broglie wavelength i.e. when the wavefunctions of the particles are touching but not overlapping. As the quantum concentration depends on temperature; high temperatures will put most systems in the classical limit unless they have a very high density e.g. a White dwarf. Fermi-Dirac statistics apply to fermions (particles that obey the Pauli exclusion principle), Bose-Einstein statistics apply to bosons. Both Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein become Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics at high temperatures or low concentrations.
Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics are often described as the statistics of "distinguishable" classical particles. In other words the configuration of particle A in state 1 and particle B in state 2 is different from the case where particle B is in state 1 and particle A is in state 2. When this idea is carried out fully, it yields the proper (Boltzmann) distribution of particles in the energy states, but yields non-physical results for the entropy, as embodied in Gibbs paradox. These problems disappear when it is realized that all particles are in fact indistinguishable. Both of these distributions approach the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution in the limit of high temperature and low density, without the need for any ad hoc assumptions. Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics are particularly useful for studying gases F-D statistics are most often used for the study of electrons in solids. As such, they form the basis of semiconductor device theory and electronics.
A derivation of the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution
In this particular derivation, the Boltzmann distribution will be derived using the assumption of distinguishable particles, even though the ad hoc correction for Boltzmann counting is ignored, the results remain valid.
Suppose we have a number of energy levels, labelled by index i , each level having energy [\epsilon_i] and containing a total of [N_i] particles. To begin with, lets ignore the degeneracy problem. Assume that there is only one way to put [N_i] particles into energy level i.
The number of different ways of performing an ordered selection of one object from [N] objects is obviously [N]. The number of different ways of selecting 2 objects from [N] objects, in a particular order, is thus [N(N-1)] and that of selecting [n] objects in a particular order is seen to be [N!/(N-n)!]. The number of ways of selecting 2 objects from [N] objects without regard to order is [N(N-1)] divided by the number of ways 2 objects can be ordered, which is 2!. It can be seen that the number of ways of selecting [n] objects from [N] objects without regard to order is the binomial coefficient: [N!/n!(N-n)!]. If we have a set of boxes numbered [1,2, \ldots, k], the number of ways of selecting [N_1] objects from [N] objects and placing them in box 1, then selecting [N_2] objects from the remaining [N-N_1] objects and placing them in box 2 etc. is
- [W=\left(\frac\right)~\left(\frac\right)~\ldots\left(\frac\right)]
- [=N!\prod_^k (1/N_i!)]
- [W=N!\prod \frac}]
| . | . | . | . | . | . | |||||||||||
| c | . | . | c | b | . | . | b | a | . | . | a | |||||
| ab | ab | ac | ac | bc | bc | |||||||||||
The six ways are calculated from the formula:
- [W=N!\prod \frac}= 3!\left(\frac\right)\left(\frac\right)\left(\frac\right)=6]
- [f(N_i)=\ln(W)+\alpha(N-\sum N_i)+\beta(E-\sum N_i \epsilon_i)]
- [N_i = \frac} ]
- [N_i = \frac} ]
- [N_i = \frac/z} ]
Alternatively, we may use the fact that
- [\sum_i N_i=N\,]
- [N_i = N\frac} ]
- [Z = \sum_i g_i e^]
Another derivation
In the above discussion, the Boltzmann distribution function was obtained via directly analysing the multiplicities of a system. Alternatively, one can make use of the canonical ensemble. In a canonical ensemble, a system is in thermal contact with a reservoir. While energy is free to flow between the system and the reservoir, the reservoir is thought to have infinitely large heat capacity as to maintain constant temperature, T, for the combined system.
In the present context, our system is assumed to be have energy levels [\epsilon _i] with degeneracies [g_i]. As before, we would like to calculate the probability that our system has energy [\epsilon_i].
If our system is in state [\; s_1], then there would be a corresponding number of microstates available to the reservoir. Call this number [\; \Omega _ R (s_1)]. By assumption, the combined system (of the system we are interested in and the reservoir) is isolated, so all microstates are equally probable. Therefore, for instance, if [ \; \Omega _ R (s_1) = 2 \; \Omega _ R (s_2) ], we can conclude that our system is twice as likely to be in state [\; s_2] than [\; s_1]. In general, if [\; P(s_i)] is the probability that our system is in state [\; s_i],
- [\frac = \frac.]
- [\frac = \frac /k } /k} = e^.]
- [d S_R = \frac (d U_R + P d V_R - \mu d N_R)].
- [(S_R (s_1) - S_R (s_2) = \frac (U_R (s_1) - U_R (s_2)) = - \frac (E(s_1) - E(s_2))]
- [\frac = \frac } }]
- [P(s) = \frac e^]
- [\; Z = \sum _s e^ ]
- [P (\epsilon _i) = \frac g_i e^]
Comments
- Notice that in this formulation, the initial assumption "... suppose the system has total N particles..." is dispensed with. Indeed, the number of particles possessed by the system plays no role in arriving at the distribution. Rather, how many particles would occupy states with energy [\epsilon _i] follows as an easy consequence.
- What has been presented above is essentially a derivation of the canonical partition function. As one can tell by comparing the definitions, the Boltzman sum over states is really no different from the canonical partition function.
- Exactly the same approach can be used to derive Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein statistics. However, there one would replace the canonical ensemble with the grand canonical ensemble, since there is exchange of particles between the system and the reservoir. Also, the system one considers in those cases is a single particle state, not a particle. (In the above discussion, we could have assumed our system to be a single atom.)
Limits of applicability
The Bose-Einstein and Fermi-Dirac distributions may be written:
- [N_i = \frac\pm 1} ]
- [e^ \gg 1]
- [\mu=\left(\frac\right)_=-kT\ln\left(\frac\right)]
- [\frac\gg 1.]
See also
From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Original article here. Support Wikipedia by contributing or donating.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License See Wikipedia Copyrights for details.
