Opentopia Directory Encyclopedia Tools

Multinational force in Iraq

Encyclopedia : M : MU : MUL : Multinational force in Iraq


The Multinational force in Iraq, also known as the Coalition, refers to the nations whose governments have military personnel in Iraq. The U.S. media usually refer to it as an international coalition, while non-American media use the term US-led coalition, since over 85% of the troops are American.

The term "Coalition of the Willing" refers to the nations who supported (most of them not militarily) the United States position in the Iraq disarmament crisis and later the 2003 invasion of Iraq and subsequent occupation duties in Post-invasion Iraq, 2003–2006. The original list in March 2003 included 49 members, [link] but since then at least one country (Costa Rica) has asked to be taken off the list. [link]

2003 Invasion of Iraq

The Bush administration made varying arguments regarding the purpose about the war; after the start of the war and the absence of banned weapons, however, the purpose transformed into an effort to free the Iraqi people from tyranny and to promote stability in the region.

The Occupation of Iraq

Nominally, the occupation ended on June 28, 2004, but those who question the legitimacy of the interim government appointed by the United States believe it continued. Indeed, the expulsion of occupation forces is a major stated aim of Iraqi guerrilla fighters. United States president Bush disagreed with the rationale of the insurgents, claiming that "...what is causing violence in Iraq is the fact that Iraq is heading toward freedom." [link]

The United States deployed more than seven-eighths of the soldiers in the occupying coalition with the majority of other troops coming from the United Kingdom and the rest made up from several other allies. Although their status as Coalition Provisional Authority, or "Occupying Powers" under a United Nations resolution, changed when the new government asserted its sovereignty on June 28, the mission of the multinational force has decreased only by small numbers.

As of March 10, 2006, the United States Department of Defense had confirmed that 2,308 US troops had been killed fighting in Iraq as United States forces struggle to put down the Iraqi insurgency, which continues years after President Bush declared the end of "major combat operations" in Iraq.

Mission objectives

MNF-I objectives as of May 2006

The government of Iraq enjoys broad international support, including from nations of the Arab League. Jordan is assisting in training of the Iraqi Security Forces, United Arab Emirates have donated military equipment (bought from Switzerland) and Egypt are actively helping in the reconciliation process, for example.

Iraq is a pluralistic democracy. Iraq's constitution guarantees freedoms of speech, assembly and religion, private ownership of property, privacy and equality before the law. The December 2005 parliamentary election had a 75% voter turnout.

As of May 2006, 254,000 Iraqi security forces have been trained and equipped. By the end of 2006, MNF-I believes that all 325,000 planned ISF members will be trained and equipped. ISF may be fully capable of maintaining domestic order sometime in 2007, perhaps with coalition help in logistics, close-air support and medical assistance.[MNF-I Press briefing May 11, 2006]

The \"Coalition of the Willing\" phrase

Original countries in the "Coalition of the Willing"
Enlarge
Original countries in the "Coalition of the Willing"

The origin of the phrase

The precise origins of the phrase are unknown, but it has been used since at least the late 1980s to refer to groups of nations acting collectively, often in defiance of the United Nations. Specific uses of the phrase in the context of disarming Iraq began appearing in mid-2001.

The first U.S. President known to have publicly mentioned acting with a "Coalition of the Willing" in place of a UN Mandate was Bill Clinton. The phrase was later used by George W. Bush to refer both to actions in Afghanistan and Iraq, although usage primarily focused on the latter.

Criticism of and humorous comment on the phrase

Iraq War critics such as John Pilger have pointed out that 98% of the military is from the US and Britain and is therefore accurately described as a predominantly Anglo-American force rather than as a coalition.

In a 2004 U.S. presidential debate, Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry questioned the size of the coalition, saying that Bush portrayed the effort as a widespread international consensus when actually only two major allies of the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia, had comparatively substantial numbers of soldiers on the ground during the initial invasion. President Bush responded by saying, "Well, actually, he forgot Poland". The phrase You forgot Poland subsequently became a humorous shorthand for the perception that most members of the coalition were not contributing much to the war effort compared to the main three allies. The majority of the population in most countries involved did not, according to some surveys, support the endeavour or their nation's participation.[link]

U.S. Senator Robert Byrd, ranking Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, has referred to the coalition formed for the 2003 invasion of Iraq by the acronym COW, expressing his concern that the United States was being "milked" as a "cash cow." A Canadian MP Carolyn Parrish referred to the "Coalition of the Willing" as the "Coalition of the Idiots". She was reprimanded for these comments, and was eventually removed from the Liberal Party caucus.

List of nations in the Coalition

Multinational forces in Iraq
Enlarge
Multinational forces in Iraq

More than 100,000 soldiers

Search Titles
0123456789
ABCDEFGHIJ
KLMNOPQRST
UVWXYZ?

E-mail this article to:

Personal Message: