Opentopia Directory Encyclopedia Tools

Pearl Harbor (film)

Encyclopedia : P : PE : PEA : Pearl Harbor (film)


Pearl Harbor is a war film released in the summer of 2001 by Touchstone Pictures. It stars Ben Affleck, Alec Baldwin, Jon Voight, Josh Hartnett, Kate Beckinsale, Cuba Gooding Jr., Dan Aykroyd, Jaime King, and Jennifer Garner. It was a dramatic re-imagining of the attack on Pearl Harbor, produced by the team of Jerry Bruckheimer and Michael Bay, who had previously been involved with such summer blockbusters as Armageddon and The Rock. The final section of the movie relates the Doolittle Raid, the first American attack on the Japanese home islands in World War II.

Production, release and critical response

Pearl Harbor was released Memorial Day weekend in 2001. Despite its dazzling special effects, the movie received overwhelmingly negative reviews, as its 25% rating on the Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer indicates. Many critics dismissed the film as shallow, hackneyed, and historically insensitive, also citing such literary flaws such as the exceedingly banal dialogue, poorly devised love triangle plot, and the unappealing and paper-thin nature of the lead characters.http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1108389-pearl_harbor/

Critic Roger Ebert summarized Pearl Harbor as "a two-hour movie squeezed into three hours, about how on Dec. 7, 1941, the Japanese staged a surprise attack on an American love triangle," and claimed that, "The filmmakers seem to have aimed the film at an audience that may not have heard of Pearl Harbor, or perhaps even of World War Two."http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20010525/REVIEWS/105250301/1023

Director Michael Bay has said that Roger Ebert's criticism of Pearl Harbor has to be his most offensive of his entire career. According to Michael Bay: "He commented on TV that bombs don't fall like that. Does he actually think we didn't research every nook and cranny of how armor-piercing bombs fell? He's watched too many movies. He thinks they all fall flat - armor-piercing bombs fall straight down, that's the way it was designed! But HE's on the air pontificating and giving the wrong information. That's insulting!"http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000881/bio

The bombastic tone of the film was frequently cited as the polar opposite of the 1998 Steven Spielberg film Saving Private Ryan#redirect .

The movie cost approximately U.S. $140 million to film, earning it the title of the largest approved production budget for a film to that date#redirect , but it grossed only U.S. $200 million at the domestic box office, possibly indicating an overall loss. Pearl Harbor was released on DVD on December 4, 2001, three days before the actual 60th anniversary of the attack.http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0213149/dvd

Award nominations

At the 2002 Academy Awards, Pearl Harbor was nominated for four awards. winning one for Sound Effects Editing. Its other nominations were for Best Sound, Best Visual Effects, and Best Song. [[Citing sources citation needed]]

At the 2001 Golden Raspberry Awards Pearl Harbor was nominated for five awards: Worst Director, Worst Screenplay, Worst Screen Couple, Worst Actor, and Worst Sequel or Remake (presumably of the 1970 film Tora! Tora! Tora! [[Citing sources citation needed]])—but lost to Tom Green's Freddy Got Fingered in all but the latter category, wherein it lost to Tim Burton's version of Planet of the Apes. [[Citing sources citation needed]]

Replacing real figures

DVD cover
Enlarge
DVD cover

The roles that the two male leads played by Affleck and Hartnett have in the attack sequence are analogous to the real historical deeds of U.S. Army Air Corps second lieutenants George Welch and Kenneth M. Taylor, who took to the skies and, between the two pilots, shot down between six and 10 (depending on source) Japanese fighters. However, the movie itself makes no mention of or allusion to Welch's and Taylor's existence in history, and the movie's plot involving the leads, aside from their roles in the attack sequence, does not match any other historical account of Welch or Taylor.

Because Bay's movie makes no mention of or allusion to Welch's and Taylor's existence, some consider the very presence of the two fictional main characters in their steads a blatant usurpation of the true historical figures' roles. This point, when coupled with what many critics feel is an arbitrary and ill-conceived love triangle plot involving the fictional replacements, makes some regard Pearl Harbor as an abuse of artistic licence.http://www.voicenet.com/~lpadilla/pearl.html

More controversy about historical accuracy

Like many historical dramas, Pearl Harbor provoked debate about the artistic licence taken by its producers and director. Mark Carnes, history professor at Barnard College and general editor of Past Imperfect: History According to the Movies (ISBN 0805037594), commented on this subject in general terms during a NewsHour interview broadcast three years before Pearl Harbor was released:
The difficulty is this. The truths of the movie tend to be clean and pure and powerful and simple. And history never is; history is complex, muddy, difficult. Movies make good guys too good, bad guys too bad. They adopt narrative lines that are too simple, all in an effort to reach a broad audience. The more expensive the movie, the greater the need to reach a huge audience, an audience that can quickly apprehend its themes. You know, this emphasis on simplicity and power and immediately hitting your audience means that the movies are much too simple compared to the past. I don't think there's any harm in that.http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/entertainment/jan-june98/history_2-10.html

National Geographic Channel produced a documentary called http://plasma.nationalgeographic.com/pearlharbor/ngbeyond/ http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0429665/ which covers some of the ways that "the film's final cut didn't reflect all the attacks' facts, or represent them all accurately"http://cnnstudentnews.cnn.com/2001/fyi/news/05/24/pearl.harbor/index.html.

Touchstone Pictures' official stance on the movie is that "it's a love story" and was never meant to be a historical account of the event. [[Citing sources citation needed]]

The movie portrays many of the widely held but unverified beliefs about the Pearl Harbor attack as being unambiguously true, such as Doris Miller's exaggerated heroism, and the carelessness or incompetence of Admiral Husband E. Kimmel and General Walter C. Short (subsequent investigations showed that neither of the officers were informed by the Office of Naval Intelligence prior to the attack)[[Citing sources citation needed]].

Other inaccuracies include:

Pop culture trivia

The movie ridicules this film in the song "The End of an Act", a mournful song in which the singer laments the loss of his lover, as well as the fact that "Pearl Harbor sucked," citing, among other things:

References

General reference: Specific footnotes:

External links

 


From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Original article here. Support Wikipedia by contributing or donating.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License See Wikipedia Copyrights for details.

Search Titles
0123456789
ABCDEFGHIJ
KLMNOPQRST
UVWXYZ?

E-mail this article to:

Personal Message: