Opentopia Directory Encyclopedia Tools

PepsiCo

Encyclopedia : P : PE : PEP : PepsiCo



 

PepsiCo, Inc. NYSE: [PEP] is a global American beverage and snack company. The company manufactures, markets and sells a variety of carbonated and non-carbonated beverages as well as salty, sweet and grain-based snacks, and other foods. Besides the Pepsi-Cola brands (including Mountain Dew), the company manufactures Quaker Oats, Gatorade, Frito-Lay and Tropicana. In many ways, PepsiCo differs from its competitor The Coca-Cola Company, having three times as many employees, larger revenues, but a smaller net profit (See comparison at [Yahoo Finance]). The company formed for distribution and bottling is the Pepsi Bottling Group NYSE: [PBG]. PepsiCo is a SIC 2080 (beverage) company.

History

Headquartered in Purchase, New York, The Pepsi Cola Company began in 1898, but it only became known as PepsiCo when it merged with Frito Lay in 1965. Until 1997, it also owned Kentucky Fried Chicken, Pizza Hut, and Taco Bell, but these fast-food restaurants were spun off into Tricon Global Restaurants, now Yum! Brands, Inc. PepsiCo purchased Tropicana in 1998, and Quaker Oats in 2001.

Corporate governance

Current members of the board of directors of PepsiCo are: John Akers, Robert E. Allen, Dina Dublon, Victor Dzau, Ray Hunt, Alberto Ibargüen, Arthur Martinez, Indra Nooyi, Steven Reinemund, Sharon Rockefeller, James Schiro, Franklin Thomas, Cynthia Trudell, and Daniel Vasella.

Former top executives at PepsiCo

PepsiCo brands

PepsiCo owns five different billion-dollar brands, the most of any company. These are Pepsi, Tropicana, Lay's, Doritos, and Gatorade. The company owns many other brands as well.

Partnerships

PepsiCo also has formed partnerships with several brands it does not own, in order to distribute these or market them with its own brands.

Discontinued lines

Former brands

PepsiCo owned a number of restaurant chains until it exited that business in 1997, selling some, and spinning off others into a new company Tricon Global Restaurants, now known as Yum! Brands, Inc.). PepsiCo also previously owned several other brands that it later sold.

Praise

Diversity

PepsiCo received a 100 percent rating on the Corporate Equality Index released by the Human Rights Campaign starting in 2004, the third year of the report.

Tampering

During the summer of 1993, PepsiCo managed to stave off a runaway hoax pertaining to alleged product tampering. Syringes were claimed to have been found in cans of Diet Pepsi -- first in Seattle, then throughout the U.S. over the next few days. With the arrests of several of the fraudulent claimants, reports of found hypodermic needles ceased. PepsiCo's subsequent handling of the situation via carefully-worded press releases and VNRs is frequently cited as a textbook example of how exactly to handle falsely-spread rumors about a company.[link]

Criticisms

PepsiCo in India

A woman waking up on a sidewalk in Bijapur, India, under a Pepsi advertisement.
Enlarge
A woman waking up on a sidewalk in Bijapur, India, under a Pepsi advertisement.

PepsiCo gained entry to India in 1988 by creating a joint venture with the Punjab government-owned Punjab Agro Industrial Corporation (PAIC) and Voltas India Limited. This joint venture marketed and sold Lehar Pepsi until 1991 when the use of foreign brands was allowed; PepsiCo bought out its partners and ended the joint venture in 1994. ["Coca-Cola India"], Jennifer Kaye, Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth, 2004 (PDF) Others claim that firstly Pepsi was banned from import in India, in 1970, for having refused to release the list of its ingredients and in 1993, the ban was lifted, with Pepsi arriving on the market shortly afterwards. These controversies are a reminder of "India's sometimes acrimonious relationship with huge multinational companies." Indeed, some argue that PepsiCo and The Coca-Cola Company have "been major targets in part because they are well-known foreign companies that draw plenty of attention." ["Coke, Pepsi lose fight over labels"], Knight Ridder News, 9 December 2004

In 2003, the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), a non-governmental organization in New Dehli, said aerated waters produced by soft drinks manufacturers in India, including multinational giants PepsiCo and The Coca-Cola Company, contained toxins including lindane, DDT, malathion and chlorpyrifos — pesticides that can contribute to cancer, a breakdown of the immune system and cause birth defects. Tested products included Coke, Pepsi, 7 Up, Mirinda, Fanta, Thums Up, Limca, Sprite. CSE found that the Indian-produced Pepsi's soft drink products had 36 times the level of pesticide residues permitted under European Union regulations; Coca Cola's 30 times. ["Indian Coke, Pepsi Laced with Pesticides, Says NGO"], ''Inter Press Service, August 5, 2003CSE said it had tested the same products in the US and found no such residues. However, this was the European standard for water, not for other drinks. No law bans the presence of pesticides in drinks in India.

The Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo angrily denied allegations that their products manufactured in India contained toxin levels far above the norms permitted in the developed world. But an Indian parliamentary committee, in 2004, backed up CSE's findings and a government-appointed committee is now trying to develop the world's first pesticide standards for soft drinks. Coke and PepsiCo opposed the move, arguing that lab tests aren't reliable enough to detect minute traces of pesticides in complex drinks. On December 7, 2004, India's Supreme Court ruled that both PepsiCo and competitor The Coca-Cola Company must label all cans and bottles of the respective soft drinks with a consumer warning after tests showed unacceptable levels of residual pesticides.#redirect [[Template:fact]]

Both companies continue to maintain that their products meet all international safety standards without yet implementing the Supreme Court ruling.#redirect [[Template:fact]] As of 2005, The Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo together hold 95% market share of soft-drink sales in India. ["How a Global Web of Activists Gives Coke Problems in India"], Wall Street Journal, July 7 2005 PepsiCo has also been alleged to practice "water piracy" due to its role in exploitation of ground water resources resulting in scarcity of drinking water for the natives of Pudussery panchayat in the Palakkad distict in Kerala, India. Local residents have been pressuring the government to close down the PepsiCo unit in the village.

PepsiCo in Burma

From 1991 until 1997 PepsiCo invested in the Burmese military regime which has been alleged to be responsible for some of the worst human rights violations in the world. PepsiCo's involvement saw one of the biggest Burma-related boycotts in history - on a par with those against Texaco, running around the same time, and currently against Total Oil. PepsiCo formally began their investment in Burma in November 1991 when they opened a bottling plant in the then-capital Rangoon, in direct contradiction to Aung San Suu Kyi's and the National League for Democracy's requests for no foreign investment in Burma until it returned to democracy. The campaign against Pepsi was initiated by the Asian-based Burma Rights Movement for Action, but was not taken up seriously in the West as Burmese human rights groups at the time were focused on Texaco, Amaco and Petro-Canada. When Petro-Canada left Burma, however Canadian and U.S. based Burmese democracy groups took up the campaign with huge dedication. The campaign received a massive boost when, in 1996, the Free Burma Coalition took the lead in forcing Pepsi out of American universities. This included the scrapping of a $1 million deal at Harvard. The campaign then began to spread to Europe where a huge boycott took hold. In response, in 1996, PepsiCo attempted to step out of the spotlight by selling their Burmese investment to their sister company and making it a franchise. Aung Sung Suu Kyi responded "As far as we are concerned, Pepsi[Co] has not divested from Burma" and both human rights and environmental groups continued the pressure on Pepsi. Eventually, with the Burmese regime holding violent anti-democracy rallies and pressure from around the world mounting, PepsiCo cut all ties with Burma on May 31, 1997 for business reasons, as the Burmese operation was unprofitable. However, to this day, PepsiCo has not admitted that it was morally wrong to invest in Burma as other companies have upon leaving the country. [Pepsi boycott history]

Pepsi and bullfighting

PepsiCo has received criticism from animal rights activists for advertising in stadiums that are used for bullfighting. [Coke, Pepsi, and Baby Cows]

Related links

External links

 


From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Original article here. Support Wikipedia by contributing or donating.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License See Wikipedia Copyrights for details.


Search Titles
0123456789
ABCDEFGHIJ
KLMNOPQRST
UVWXYZ?

E-mail this article to:

Personal Message: