Pitch class
Encyclopedia : P : PI : PIT : Pitch class
Human pitch-perception is periodic: pitches separated by an integral number of octaves are perceived as having a similar "quality" or "color." Psychologists refer to the quality of a pitch as its "chroma." Music theorists typically use the term "pitch class" rather than "chroma."
There is a subtle difference between the concepts "chroma" and "pitch class." A "chroma" is an attribute of pitches, just like whiteness is an attribute of white things. A "pitch class" is a set of all pitches sharing the same chroma, just like "the set of all white things" is the collection of all white objects. Music theory's use of the term "pitch class" rather than "chroma" reflects the influence of logical positivism on its founders, particularly Milton Babbitt.
The pitch class "C" is an infinite set containing all pitches with the chroma C, no matter what octave they are in. Thus, using scientific pitch notation it is the infinite set
- =
To avoid the problem of enharmonic spellings, theorists typically represent pitch classes using numbers. One can map a pitch's fundamental frequency [ f ] (measured in hertz) to a real number [ p ] using the equation
- [p = 69 + 12\log_2 ]
- 0 = C, 1 = C♯/D♭, 2 = D, 2.5 = "D quarter-tone sharp"
To avoid confusing 10 with 1 and 0, some theorists assign pitch classes 10 and 11 the letters "t" (after "ten") and e (after "eleven"), respectively (or A and B, as in the writings of Allen Forte and Robert Morris).
| pc | tonal counterparts |
|---|---|
| 0 | C (also B sharp, D double-flat) |
| 1 | C sharp, D flat (also B double-sharp) |
| 2 | D (also C double-sharp, E double-flat) |
| 3 | D sharp, E flat (also F double-flat) |
| 4 | E (also D double-sharp, F flat) |
| 5 | F (also E sharp, G double-flat) |
| 6 | F sharp, G flat (also E double-sharp) |
| 7 | G (also F double-sharp, A double-flat) |
| 8 | G sharp, A flat |
| 9 | A (also G double-sharp, B double-flat) |
| t or A | A sharp, B flat (also C double-flat) |
| e or B | B (also A double-sharp, C flat) |
Other ways to label pitch classes
The system described above is flexible enough to describe any pitch class in any tuning system: for example, one can use the numbers to refer to the five-tone scale that divides the octave evenly. However, in some contexts, it is convenient to use alternative labeling systems. For example, in just intonation, we may express pitches in terms of positive rational numbers p/q, expressed by reference to a 1 (often written "1/1") which represents a fixed pitch. If a and b are two positive rational numbers, they belong to the same pitch class if and only if
- [a/b = 2^n]
It is also very common to label pitch classes with reference to some scale. For example, one can label the pitch classes of n-tone equal temperament using the integers 0 to n-1. In much the same way, one could label the pitch classes of the C major scale, C-D-E-F-G-A-B using the numbers from 0 to 6. This system has two advantages over the continuous labeling system described above. First, it eliminates any suggestion that there is something natural about a 12-fold division of the octave. Second, it avoids pitch-class universes with unwieldy decimal expansions when considered relative to 12; for example, in the continuous system, the pitch-classes of 19-tet are labeled 0.63158... , 1.26316... , etc. Labeling these pitch classes simplifies the arithmetic used in pitch-class set manipulations.
The disadvantage of the scale-based system is that it assigns an infinite number of different names to chords that sound identical. For example, in twelve-tone equal-temperament the C major triad is notated . In twenty-four-tone equal-temperament, this same triad is labeled . Moreover, the scale-based system appears to suggest that different tuning systems use steps of the same size ("1") but have octaves of differing size ("12" in 12-tone equal-temperament, "19" in 19-tone equal temperament, and so on), whereas in fact the opposite is true: different tuning systems divide the same octave into different-sized steps.
In general, it is often more useful to use the traditional integer system when one is working within a single temperament; when one is comparing chords in different temperaments, the continuous system can be more useful.
See also
References
- Rahn, John (1980). Basic Atonal Theory. ISBN 0028731603.
From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Original article here. Support Wikipedia by contributing or donating.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License See Wikipedia Copyrights for details.
