Proto-Slavic language

Encyclopedia : P : PR : PRO : Proto-Slavic language

Proto-Slavic is the proto-language from which Old Church Slavonic and all the other Slavic languages later emerged. It was spoken before the 7th century. No Proto-Slavic writings have been found, so the language has been reconstructed from applying the comparative method to all the attested Slavic languages and other Indo-European languages.

Origin

Historical distribution of the Slavic languages. The area shaded in light purple is the Prague-Penkov-Kolochin complex of cultures of the 6th to 7th c. AD, likely corresponding to the spread of Slavic tribes at the time. The area shaded in darker red indicates the core area of Slavic river names (after EIEC p. 524ff.)

There is much debate whether pre-Proto-Slavic branched off directly from Proto-Indo-European, or whether it passed through a Proto-Balto-Slavic stage.

Proto-Slavic proper developed during the early 1st millennium AD, and was separated into dialects in the 5th or 6th century, as Slavic tribes began to migrate in the wake of the Germanic migration period.

In the second half of the 9th century, the dialect spoken north of Thessaloniki became the basis for first written Slavic language, created by the brothers Cyril and Methodius who translated portions of the Bible and other church books. The language they recorded is known as Old Church Slavonic. Old Church Slavonic is not identical to Proto-Slavic, having been recorded at least two centuries after the breakup of Proto-Slavic, and it shows features that clearly distinguish it from Proto-Slavic. However, it is still reasonably close, and the mutual intellegibility between Old Church Slavonic and other Slavic dialects of those days was proved by Cyril's and Methodius' mission to Great Moravia and Pannonia. There, their early South Slavic dialect used for the translations was clearly understandable to the local population which spoke an early West Slavic dialect.

Vowels

There were 11 vowels in Late Proto-Slavic: i, ь, e, ę, ě, a, o, ǫ, ъ, y, u. Explanations:

• ь, ъ - yers, or ultrashort vowels, probably close to IPA [ɪ], [ɯ] respectively;
• ę, ǫ - nasal e, o;
• ě - yat, long vowel pronounced probably like [æː]
• y - long vowel pronounced probably like [ɯː] according to some scholars, it was the diphthong [ɯi] instead;
• i, a, u were long vowels;
• e, o were short vowels;
• existence of syllabic sonorants in Proto-Slavic is not generally accepted, they may have developed only in individual Slavic dialects (as many believe, no syllabic sonorants were in East Slavic dialects); many scholars postulate the group ъl, ьl, ъr, ьr instead of the syllabic sonorants l̥, ĺ̥, r̥, ŕ̥.

Consonants

Consonantal system in Late Proto-Slavic

consonants	labial	dental	palatalized dental	alveolar	palatalized alveolar	palatal	velar
stops	p, b	t, d					k, g
affricates			c, ʒ		č, ǯ
fricatives	v	s, z	s’		š, ž		x
nasals	m	n
liquids		l		r		j

Remarks:

• x means a velar fricative, similar to Scottish ch;
• v must have been labial and similar to English w; the symbol v, however, is widely used;
• s’ is reconstructed on the basis of West Slavic š = East and South Slavic s;
• c means the affricate [ʦ], therefore not the same as the IPA [c]
• ʒ means its voiced counterpart [ʣ],
• š, č, ž and ǯ mean IPA [ʃ], [ʧ], [ʒ] and [ʤ] respectively; all these symbols are in common use in Slavistics.

Origin of vowels

• i₁ < PIE *ī, *ei;
• i₂ < reduced *ai (*ăi or *ui) < PIE *ai, *oi;
• ь < *i < PIE *i;
• e < PIE *e;
• ę < PIE *en, *em;
• ě₁ < PIE *ē,
• ě₂ < *ai < PIE *ai, *oi;
• a < *ā < PIE *ā, *ō;
• o < *a < PIE *a, *o, *ə;
• ǫ < *an, *am < PIE *an, *on, *am, *om;
• ъ < *u < PIE *u;
• y < PIE *ū;
• u < *au < PIE *au, *ou.

• The vowels i₂, ě₂ developed later than i₁, ě₁. In Late Proto-Slavic there were no differences in pronunciation between i₁ and i₂ as well as between ě₁ and ě₂. They had caused, however, different changes of preceding velars, see below.
• Late Proto-Slavic yers ь, ъ < earlier i, u developed also from reduced PIE *e, *o respectively. The reduction was probably a morphologic process rather than phonetic.
• We can observe similar reduction of *ā into *ū (and finally y) in some endings, esp. in closed syllables.
• The development of the Proto-Slavic i₂ was also a morphologic phenomenon as it originated only in some endings.
• Another source of the Proto-Slavic y is *ō in Germanic loanwords - the borrowings took place when Proto-Slavic had not ō in native words any longer, as PIE *ō had already changed into *ā.
• PIE *ə disappeared without traces when in a non-initial syllable.
• PIE *eu probably developed into *jau in Early Proto-Slavic (or: during the Balto-Slavic epoch), and eventually into Proto-Slavic *ju.
• According to some authors, PIE long diphthongs *ēi, *āi, *ōi, *ēu, *āu, *ōu had twofold development in Early Proto-Slavic, namely they shortened in endings into simple *ei, *ai, *oi, *eu, *au, *ou but they lost their second element elsewhere and changed into *ē, *ā, *ō with further development like above.

Other vocalic changes

• *jo, *jъ, *jy changed into *je, *jь, *ji;
• *o, *ъ, *y also changed into *e, *ь, *i after *c, *ʒ, *s’ which developed as the result of the 3rd palatalization;
• *e, *ě changed into *o, *a after *č, ǯ, *š, *ž in some contexts / words;
• a similar change of *ě into *a after *j seems to have occurred in Proto-Slavic but next it can have been modified by analogy.

Origin of consonants

• p < PIE *p;
• b < PIE *b, *bʰ;
• t < PIE *t;
• d < PIE *d, *dʰ;
• k < PIE *k, *kʷ;
• g < PIE *g, *gʰ, *gʷ, *gʷʰ;
• s < PIE *s, *ḱ;
• z < PIE *ǵ, *ǵʰ, *s [z] before a voiced consonant;
• x < PIE *s before a vowel when after *r, *u, *k, *i, probably also after *l; see Ruki;
• m < PIE *m;
• n < PIE *n;
• l < PIE *l;
• r < PIE *r;
• v < PIE *w;
• j < PIE *j.

Moreover:

• c < k in the 2nd palatalization;
• ʒ < g in the 2nd palatalization;
• s’ < x in the 2nd palatalization;
• č < kj and k in the 1st palatalization;
• šč < stj, skj and sk in the 1st palatalization;
• ǯ < zdj, zgj and zg in the 1st palatalization;
• š < sj, xj and x in the 1st palatalization;
• ž < zj, gj and g in the 1st palatalization;
• initial j originated before the front vowels e, ě, ę (and before ь, i in some dialects).

• The 1st palatalization

*k, *g, *x > *č, *ǯ, *š before *i₁, *ě₁, *e, *ę, *ь;

next ǯ changed into ž everywhere except after z;

*kt, *gt > *tj before *i₁, *ě₁, *e, *ę, *ь (there are only examples for *kti).

• The 2nd palatalization

*k, *g, *x > *c, *ʒ, *s’ before *i₂, *ě₂;

*s’ mixed with s or š in individual Slavic dialects;

*ʒ simplified into z, except Polish;

also *kv, *gv, *xv > *cv, *ʒv, *s’v before *i₂, *ě₂ in some dialects (not in West Slavic and probably not in East Slavic - Russian examples may be of South Slavic origin);

as it seems, the 2nd palatalization did not occur in old northern Russian dialects.

• The 3rd palatalization

*k, *g, *x > *c, *ʒ, *s’ after front vowels (*i, *ь, *ě, *e, *ę) and *ьr (= *ŕ̥), before a vowel;

it was progressive contrary to the 1st and the 2nd palatalization;

it occurred inconsistently, only in certain words, and sometimes it was limited to some Proto-Slavic dialects;

sometimes a palatalized form and a non-palatalized one existed side-by-side even within the same dialect (ex. Old Church Slavonic sikъ || sicь 'such');

in fact, no examples are known for the 3rd palatalization after *ě, *e, and (few) examples after *ŕ̥ are limited to Old Church Slavonic.

• Consonants + j

*sj, *zj > *š, *ž;

*stj, *zdj > *šč, *žǯ;

*kj, *gj, *xj > *č, *ǯ, *š (next *ǯ > *ž);

*skj, *zgj > *šč, *žǯ;

*tj, *dj had been preserved and developed variously in individual Slavic dialects;

*rj, *lj, *nj had been preserved until the end of the Proto-Slavic epoch, next developed into palatalized *ŕ, *ĺ, *ń;

*pj, *bj, *vj, *mj had been preserved until the end of the Proto-Slavic epoch, next developed into *pĺ, *bĺ, *vĺ, *mĺ in most Slavic dialects (except Western Slavic).

Loanwords

The lexical stock of Proto-Slavic also includes a number of loanwords from the languages of various tribes and peoples that the Proto-Slavs came into contact with. However, the list of the borrowings, their sources and other details are under discussion. According to most sources, the earliest traceable lexical or semantic borrowings were loans from the Northeastern Iranian languages spoken by the Scythian, Alanian, and Sarmatian tribes. Most of these borrowings appertain to the religious sphere: *bogъ 'God', *gatati 'to divine' ^{([Disputed statementdisputed]—see [Disputed statementdisputed]—see [Disputed statementdisputed]—see [Celtic origin([Disputed statementdisputed]—see [Germanic occupies a pivotal position, and many early Germanic loanwords into Proto-Slavic are known.}

Examples of early Germanic loanwords: *xlěbъ 'bread', *xlěvъ 'pigsty', *měčь 'sword', *stьklo 'glass', *šelmъ 'helmet', *xъlmъ 'hill', *plugъ 'plough', *skotъ 'cattle', possibly also *melko 'milk'^{([Disputed statementdisputed]—see [PGmc. *hūs). The words *lěkъ 'medicine' and *tynъ 'fence' were borrowed from Germanic (cf. Goth. lēkeis 'physician'; PGmc. *tūnaz), but are believed to be originally of Celtic origin.}

Later Germanic (Gothic and Old High German) borrowings are *pěnęʒь 'penny, money', *kъnęʒь 'king, prince, priest' (< OHG kuning), *istъba 'room, apartment' (< OHG stuba), *bjudo 'bowl, basin; table', *bukъ 'beech-tree', *tjudjь 'foreign, stranger, somebody else's' (< Gothic *þiuda 'people'), *smoky 'fig', *opica 'monkey' (< OHG affo).

Germanic also transmitted some Latin and Greek loans into Slavic:

• Latin: *kupiti 'to buy' (Goth. kaupōn from Lat. caupō 'merchant', ultimately from Etruscan), *dъska 'board' (< Lat. discus through OHG tisk), *kotьlъ 'kettle', *cěsarjь 'king, imperator', *krьstъ 'cross' (< Lat. Chrīstus through OHG Krist), *čeršn'a 'cherry' (Popular Lat. ceresia, Old Bavarian chersia), *osьlъ 'ass, donkey' (Lat. asinus, Goth. asilus);
• Greek (with Gothic mediation): *cьrky 'church', *velьbǫdъ 'camel' (< Gk. elephas 'elephant' through Goth. ulbandus);