Royal Marriages Act 1772
Encyclopedia : R : RO : ROY : Royal Marriages Act 1772
| Acts of Parliament of predecessor states to the United Kingdom |
| Acts of Parliament of the Kingdom of England to 1600 Acts of Parliament of the Kingdom of England to 1706 Acts of Parliament of the Kingdom of Scotland Acts of Parliament of the Kingdom of Ireland |
| Acts of Parliament of the United Kingdom |
| 1707–1719 | 1720–1739 | 1740–1759 | 1760–1779 1780–1799 | 1800–1819 | 1820–1839 | 1840–1859 1860–1879 | 1880–1899 | 1900–1919 | 1920–1939 1940–1959 | 1960–1979 | 1980–1999 | 2000–Present |
| Acts of the Scottish Parliament |
| Acts of the Northern Ireland Parliament |
| Acts of the Northern Ireland Assembly |
| Orders in Council for Northern Ireland |
| United Kingdom Statutory Instruments |
| Church of England Measures |
The Royal Marriages Act of 1772 is an Act of the Parliament of Great Britain (12 Geo III c. 11) which made it illegal for any member of the British royal family (defined as all descendants of King George II, excluding descendants of princesses who marry foreigners) under the age of 25 to marry without the consent of the ruling monarch. Any member of the Royal Family over the age of 25 who has been refused the sovereign's consent may marry one year after giving notice to the Privy Council of their intention to so marry, unless Parliament passes an act against the marriage in the interim.
The Act further made it a crime to perform or participate in an illegal marriage of any member of the Royal Family. This provision was repealed by the Criminal Law Act, 1967.
The 1772 Act resulted from the 1771 marriage of Henry Frederick, Duke of Cumberland, brother of George III to the commoner Anne Horton, a woman George III considered unsuitable. As the result of the Act, the 1785 marriage of George IV, then heir to the throne, to Maria Anne Fitzherbert (a Catholic widow) was deemed illegal; without the Royal Marriages Act, it is possible that the marriage could have excluded George from the throne under the Act of Settlement 1701.
The Succession to the Crown Bill, presented to Parliament on December 9, 2004, would have repealed this act in its entirety if passed.
Court precedents determine that the provisions of this Act are personal, that is, they apply to those covered by the requirement of Royal Consent even if they contract marriage outside of the United Kingdom.
Farran exemption
It has been theorized that the act is spent, because all members of the current immediate royal family are descendants (by way of Queen Alexandra) of as many as two princesses (Mary of Great Britain, landgravine of Hesse; and Louise of Great Britain, queen of Denmark and Norway; two youngest daughters of George II, great-great-grandmothers of Alexandra) who married into a foreign house (respectively, Frederick II, Landgrave of Hesse-Kassel, and king Frederick V of Denmark and Norway). This "Farran exemption" (named after Charles Farran, who popularized the theory in the 1950s) has not been tested in the courts. Consent to marriages in the Royal Family continues to be sought and granted as usual, ignoring this theory. Thus, in practice, the Farran exemption is worthless, since members of the Royal Family behave as if it did not exist.External links
From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Original article here. Support Wikipedia by contributing or donating.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License See Wikipedia Copyrights for details.