Opentopia Directory Encyclopedia Tools

S. 2611

Encyclopedia : S : S2 : S26 : S. 2611



 

Senate Bill 2611 (Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act) (abbreviated CIRA), is a United States Senate bill dealing with immigration reform. It proposes to increase security along the southern United States border with Mexico, allows long-time illegal immigrants to gain citizenship with some restrictions, and to increase the number of guest workers over and above those already present in the U.S. through a new "blue card" visa program. The sponsor of S. 2611 is Senator Arlen Specter, who introduced it on April 7, 2006. It was passed on May 25, 2006, by a vote of 62-36. Cloture was invoked, which limited debate to a 30 hour period. The parallel House Bill H.R. 4437 deals with immigration differently.

Background

Currently there are estimated to be between 11 and 12 million illegal immigrants living within the United States. On December 16, 2005, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 4437, which aims at improving the US-Mexican border security and increasing penalties for employers and smugglers of illegal immigrants. While most are supportive of increased border security, there have been various approaches to handle problems related to the large number of illegal immigrants already present in the country. The problems associated with illegal immigrants are unlicensed and uninsured drivers, identification theft and fraud, and employment fraud, and health services fraud.

The first approach to deal with this issue is to allow current illegal immigrants to apply for citizenship, after paying back taxes and a fine. Preference is given to those who have been present in the country for the longer periods of time and they must also pass the usual citizenship requirements. Critics of this approach point out that this rewards illegal behavior and can encourage greater illegal immigration into the country which would make the efforts at border security more difficult and call it essentially an amnesty that undermines the rule of law.

The second approach is to encourage illegal immigrants to return voluntarily to their original countries. This approach involves drying up employment opportunities for illegal immigrants by imposing stiffer fines and wider enforcement on employers of illegal immigrants. It closes loopholes that allow a illegal immigrants, once detained, to stay for extended periods of time, stops the "catch and release" system, and connects local law enforcement agencies to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. It also imposes harder penalties on smugglers of, and anyone aiding, illegal immigrants. Critics of this approach say that this is unduly harsh on the illegal population and usually claim that this approach could only be motivated by xenophobia.

See also the United States immigration debate.

Analysis

The major difference between the H.R. 4437 and S. 2611 is that there is a citizenship path proposed in S. 2611. This would allow illegal immigrants who have been in the country for more than five years, estimated to be 7 million in number, to apply for citizenship by paying fines and back taxes. Those who have been in the country for 2 to 5 years, numbering around 3 million, would be allowed to stay in the country without fear of deportation, but after 3 years would have to return and could apply for citizenship at border check points. Those in the country for under 2 years would be required to return to their original nations. Thus, with some waiting, 10 million illegal immigrants can become citizens, if they so desire. The fine is around $2000, but some sources say it might be higher.

S. 2611 also introduces a H-2C visa, or "blue card". This visa allows employers to bring in outside workers for up to 6 years after which the employee must spend one year in their original country. S. 2611 proposes 370 mile of fencing along highly populated areas near the border compared to the 700 miles of H.R. 4437 does. S. 2611 does not mention any expanded role for local law enforcement for border enforcement tasks (Primarily for interior enforcement) the way that H.R. 4437 does. There is an added clause that proposes that English is the language of the United States with no specifics.

The bill would also increase the annual cap for H-1B work visas from 65,000 to 115,000 with an automatic 20% increase year on year, thus increasing the number of information technology and other professionals from foreign countries eligible to work in the U.S. It also would lower the standard by which judges determine who is eligible for refugee status from "clear and convincing evidence" to "substantial evidence".

It would allow illegal immigrants to collect social security benefits based on past work. Also, the United States federal government would have to consult with Mexican officials before commencement of any fence construction on the U.S. side of the border. According to the Congressional Budget Office, illegal entries per year would still number 800,000 by 2016.[CBO Cost Esimates]

This bill has been compared to the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986.

Negative Reactions

The Federation for American Immigration Reform stated that

The Senate today passed a "comprehensive immigration reform" bill that is neither comprehensive nor in any sense a true reform. This legislation -- were it enacted into law -- throws into question the legitimacy of the entire immigration system in the United States, and its formulation exposes deep flaws in the very process how immigration laws are made in this country.[Statement from FAIR]
The Heritage Foundation has stated that the legislation might eventually add up to 66 million more immigrants to the United States over 20 years.
If enacted, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act (CIRA, S.2611) would be the most dramatic change in immigration law in 80 years, allowing an estimated 103 million persons to legally immigrate to the U.S. over the next 20 years—fully one-third of the current population of the United States. (This number was later revised downward to 66 million, or one fifth the current population of the United States)''
This may be due to the chain migration, whereby newly legalized immigrants can sponsor family members from their home country. Further they state that
A key feature of CIRA is that most immigrants identified as “temporary” are, in fact, given convertible status with a virtually unrestricted opportunity to become legal permanent residents and then citizens.[Statement from The Heritage Foundation]
So that the new visa "blue card" may further add to the number of illegal immigrants, by creating more opportunities for the overstaying of visa holders.

The President of the IEEE, a commenting on the increase H-1B visas stated,

The bill opens the spigot on numerous skilled visa categories. The question is how many high-tech workers can the United States absorb annually without driving up unemployment and driving down wages?[Statement from IEEE]

Positive Reactions

In favor of the legislation, the National Immigration Forum stated

Today, the U.S. Senate achieved a historic bipartisan breakthrough in the Senate in favor of comprehensive immigration reform. In stark contrast to the unworkable and punitive House bill enacted last December, the Senate bill has the right architecture and the right elements for comprehensive immigration reform. The bill would legalize an estimated 8 to 8.5 million undocumented immigrants and their families over the next 6 to 8 years...[Statement from National Immigration Forum]
The activist group National Council of La Raza also stated that

We have deep concerns about some of the provisions in this bill, but in the end the Senate has voted today to put millions of immigrants on a path to U.S. citizenship, and to enact the DREAM Act and AgJOBS compromise. This is a major step forward in a debate that is vital to our community and to the nation.[Statement from NCLR]

Provisions

S. 2611 sets forth border security and enforcement provisions, including provisions respecting [link]:

(1) personnel and asset increases and enhancements; (2) a National Strategy for Border Security; (3) border security initiatives, including biometric data enhancements and a biometric entry-exit system, document integrity, and mandatory detention of aliens apprehended at or between ports of entry; and (4) Central American gangs.

Sets forth provisions respecting: (1) noncitizen Armed Forces membership; (2) nonimmigrant status for athletes; (3) extension of returning worker exemption; (4) surveillance programs, including aerial and unmanned aerial surveillance; (5) a Northern Border Prosecution Initiative; (6) reimbursement of Southern Border State and county prosecutors for prosecuting federally initiated drug cases; (7) conditional nonimmigrant worker-related grants; (8) border security on federal land; and (9) parole and status adjustment relief for qualifying widows and orphans.

See also

External links

References

 


From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Original article here. Support Wikipedia by contributing or donating.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License See Wikipedia Copyrights for details.


Search Titles
0123456789
ABCDEFGHIJ
KLMNOPQRST
UVWXYZ?

E-mail this article to:

Personal Message: