Opentopia Directory Encyclopedia Tools

Steinhaus–Moser notation

Encyclopedia : S : ST : STE : Steinhaus–Moser notation


In mathematics, SteinhausMoser notation is a means of expressing certain extremely large numbers. It is an extension of Steinhaus's polygon notation.

n in a triangle (a number n in a triangle) means nn.

n in a square (a number n in a square) is equivalent with "the number n inside n triangles, which are all nested."

n in a pentagon (a number n in a pentagon) is equivalent with "the number n inside n squares, which are all nested."

etc.: n written in an (m+1)-sided polygon is equivalent with "the number n inside n m-sided polygons, which are all nested."

Steinhaus only defined the triangle, the square, and a circle n in a circle, equivalent to the pentagon defined above.

Steinhaus defined:

Moser's number is the number represented by "2 in a megagon", where a "megagon" is a polygon with "mega" sides.

Alternative notations:

and
  • *mega = [M(2,1,5)]
  • *moser = [M\big(2,1,M(2,1,5)\big)]
  • Mega

    Note that 2 in a circle is already a very large number, since 2 in a circle = square(square(2)) = square(triangle(triangle(2))) = square(triangle(22)) = square(triangle(4)) = square(44) = square(256) = triangle(triangle(triangle(...triangle(256)...))) [256 triangles] = triangle(triangle(triangle(...triangle(256256)...))) [255 triangles] = triangle(triangle(triangle(...triangle(3.2 × 10616)...))) [254 triangles] = ...

    Using the other notation:

    mega = M(2,1,5) = M(256,256,3)

    With the function [f(x)=x^x] we have mega = [f^(256) = f^(2)] where the superscript denotes a functional power, not a numerical power.

    We have (note the convention that powers are evaluated from right to left):

    Similarly: etc.

    Thus:

    Rounding more crudely (replacing the 257 at the end by 256), we get mega ≈ [256\uparrow\uparrow 257], using Knuth's up-arrow notation.

    Note that after the first few steps the value of [n^n] is each time approximately equal to [256^n]. In fact, it is even approximately equal to [10^n] (see also approximate arithmetic for very large numbers). Using base 10 powers we get:

    ...

    Moser's number

    It has been proven that Moser's number, although extremely large, is smaller than Graham's number.

    Therefore, using the Conway chained arrow notation,

    [\mbox < 3\rightarrow 3\rightarrow 65\rightarrow 2]

    See also

    External links

     


    From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Original article here. Support Wikipedia by contributing or donating.
    All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License See Wikipedia Copyrights for details.

    Search Titles
    0123456789
    ABCDEFGHIJ
    KLMNOPQRST
    UVWXYZ?

    E-mail this article to:

    Personal Message: