Technological singularity
Encyclopedia : T : TE : TEC : Technological singularity
In futures studies, a technological singularity represents an "event horizon" in the predictability of human technological development. Past this event horizon, following the creation of strong artificial intelligence or the amplification of human intelligence, existing models of the future cease to give reliable or accurate answers. Futurists predict that after the Singularity, posthumans and/or strong AI will replace humans as the dominating force in science and technology, rendering human-specific social models obsolete.
I. J. Good originally described the impact of superhuman intelligence as an "intelligence explosion"—a state in which small improvements in intelligence are used to develop larger improvements, which allow for even larger improvements, ad infinitum. Vernor Vinge referred to this event as the Singularity, and popularized it with lectures, essays, and science fiction in the 1980s.
Ray Kurzweil considers the advent of superhuman intelligence to be part of an overall exponential trend in human technological development seen originally in Moore's Law and extrapolated into a general trend in Kurzweil's own Law of Accelerating Returns. Unlike a hyperbolic function, Kurzweil's predicted exponential model never experiences a true mathematical singularity.See [Introduction to Social Macrodynamics] by Andrey Korotayev and others.
While some regard the Singularity as a positive event and work to hasten its arrival, others view the Singularity as dangerous, undesirable, or unlikely to occur. The most practical means for initiating the Singularity are debated, as are how (or whether) the Singularity can be influenced or avoided if dangerous.
- 1 History and definitions
- 2 Creating superhuman intelligence
- 3 Kurzweil's law of accelerating returns
- 4 Desirability and safety of the Singularity
- 5 Singularity predictions just a by-product of memory compression?
- 6 Fictional depictions
- 7 Popular culture
- 8 Organizations and other prominent voices
- 9 Notes
- 10 See also
- 11 References
- 12 External links
History and definitions
Though often thought to have originated in the last two decades of the 20th century, the idea of a technological singularity actually dates back to the 1950s:
- "One conversation centered on the ever accelerating progress of technology and changes in the mode of human life, which gives the appearance of approaching some essential singularity in the history of the race beyond which human affairs, as we know them, could not continue." —Stanislaw Ulam, May 1958, referring to a conversation with John von Neumann
In 1965, statistician I. J. Good described a scenario more like the Singularity in that it emphasized the effects of superhuman intelligence:
- "Let an ultraintelligent machine be defined as a machine that can far surpass all the intellectual activities of any man however clever. Since the design of machines is one of these intellectual activities, an ultraintelligent machine could design even better machines; there would then unquestionably be an 'intelligence explosion,' and the intelligence of man would be left far behind. Thus the first ultraintelligent machine is the last invention that man need ever make."
- "The mindsteps... appear to have certain things in common - a new and unfolding human perspective, related inventions in the area of memes and communications, and a long formulative waiting period before the next mindstep comes along. None of the mindsteps can be said to have been truly anticipated, and most were resisted at the early stages. In looking to the future we may equally be caught unawares. We may have to grapple with the presently inconceivable, with mind-stretching discoveries and concepts."
Vinge writes that superhuman intelligences, however created, will be even more able to enhance their own minds faster than the humans that created them. "When greater-than-human intelligence drives progress," Vinge writes, "that progress will be much more rapid." This feedback loop of self-improving intelligence, he predicts, will cause large amounts of technological progress within a short period of time.
Creating superhuman intelligence
Most proposed methods for creating smarter-than-human or transhuman minds fall into one of two categories: intelligence amplification of human brains and artificial intelligence.The means speculated to produce intelligence augmentation are numerous, and include bio- and genetic engineering, nootropic drugs, AI assistants, direct brain-computer interfaces, and mind transfer. Radical life extension techniques, cryonics, and molecular nanotechnology are often advocated by transhumanists as means to live long enough to benefit from future medical techniques, thus allowing for open-ended lifespans and participant evolution.
Despite the numerous speculated means for amplifying human intelligence, non-human artificial intelligence (specifically seed AI) is the most popular option for organizations trying to directly initiate the Singularity, a choice the Singularity Institute addresses in its publication "Why Artificial Intelligence?" (2005).
George Dyson speculates in Darwin Among the Machines that a sufficiently complex computer network may produce "swarm intelligence", and that improved future computing resources may allow AI researchers to create artificial neural networks so large and powerful they become generally intelligent. Mind uploading is a proposed alternative means of creating artificial intelligence—instead of programming a new intelligence, one copies an existing human intelligence into a digital form.
Kurzweil's law of accelerating returns
Ray Kurzweil justifies his belief in an imminent singularity by an analysis of history from which he concludes that technological progress follows a pattern of exponential growth. He calls this conclusion The Law of Accelerating Returns. He generalizes Moore's law, which describes exponential growth in integrated semiconductor complexity, to include technologies from far before the integrated circuit.
Whenever technology approaches a barrier, he writes, new technologies will cross it. He predicts paradigm shifts will become increasingly common, leading to "technological change so rapid and profound it represents a rupture in the fabric of human history" (Kurzweil 2001). Kurzweil believes the Singularity will occur before the end of the 21st century, setting the date at 2048 (Kurzweil 2005). His predictions differ from Vinge's in that he predicts a gradual ascent to the Singularity, rather than Vinge's rapidly self-improving superhuman intelligence. The distinction is often made with the terms soft and hard takeoff.
Before Kurzweil proposed his Law, many sociologists and anthropologists created social theories of sociocultural evolution. Some, like Lewis H. Morgan, Leslie White, and Gerhard Lenski, declare technological progress to be the primary factor driving the development of human civilization. Morgan's three major stages of social evolution can be divided by technological milestones. Instead of specific inventions, White decided that the measure by which to judge the evolution of culture is its control of energy, which he describes as "the primary function of culture." His model eventually led to the creation of the Kardashev scale. Lenski takes a more modern approach and declares the more information a given society has, the more advanced it is.
Since the late 1970s, others like Alvin Toffler (author of Future Shock), Daniel Bell and John Naisbitt have approached the theories of postindustrial societies similar to visions of near- and post-Singularity societies. They argue the industrial era is coming to an end, and services and information are supplanting industry and goods. Some more extreme visions of the postindustrial society, especially in fiction, envision the elimination of economic scarcity.
Theodore Modis and Jonathan Huebner have argued, from different perspectives, that the rate of technological innovation has not only ceased to rise, but is actually now declining. John Smart has [criticized] their conclusions. Others criticize Kurzweil's choices of specific past events to support his theory.
In fact, "technological singularity" is just one of a few singularities detected through the analysis of a number of characteristics of the World System development, for example, with respect to the world population, world GDP, and some other economic indexes (e.g., Johansen, A., and D. Sornette. 2001. Finite-time Singularity in the Dynamics of the World Population and Economic Indices. Physica A 294(3–4): 465–502). It has been shown (e.g., Korotayev A., Malkov A., Khaltourina D. [Introduction to Social Macrodynamics: Secular Cycles and Millennial Trends.] Moscow: URSS, 2006) that the hyperbolic pattern of the world population and technology growth (observed for many centuries, if not millennia prior to the 1970s) could be accounted for by a rather simple mechanism, the nonlinear second order positive feedback, that was shown long ago to generate precisely the hyperbolic growth, known also as the "blow-up regime" (implying just finite-time singularities). In our case this nonlinear second order positive feedback looks as follows: more people – more potential inventors – faster technological growth – the carrying capacity of the Earth grows faster – faster population growth – more people – more potential inventors – faster technological growth, and so on. On the other hand, this research has shown that since the 1970s the World System does not develop hyperbolically any more, its development diverges more and more from the blow-up regime, and at present it is moving "from singularity", rather than "toward singularity".
Desirability and safety of the Singularity
Some speculate superhuman intelligences may have goals inconsistent with human survival and prosperity. AI researcher Hugo de Garis suggests AIs may simply eliminate the human race, and humans would be powerless to stop them. Other oft-cited dangers include molecular nanotechnology and genetic engineering. These threats are major issues for both Singularity advocates and critics, and were the subject of a Wired Magazine article by Bill Joy, Why the future doesn't need us (2000). Oxford philosopher Nick Bostrom summarizes the potential threats of the Singularity to human survival in his essay Existential Risks (2002).Many Singularitarians consider nanotechnology to be one of the greatest dangers facing humanity. For this reason, they often believe seed AI should precede nanotechnology. Others, such as the Foresight Institute, advocate efforts to create molecular nanotechnology, claiming nanotechnology can be made safe for pre-Singularity use or can expedite the arrival of a beneficial Singularity.
Advocates of Friendly Artificial Intelligence acknowledge the Singularity is potentially very dangerous and work to make it safer by creating AI that will act benevolently towards humans and eliminate existential risks. This idea is also embodied in Isaac Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics, intended to prevent artificially intelligent robots from harming humans, though the crux of Asimov's stories is often how the laws fail.
Neo-Luddite views
Some argue advanced technologies are simply too dangerous for humans to morally allow them to be built, and advocate efforts to stop their invention. Theodore Kaczynski, the Unabomber, writes that technology may enable the upper classes of society to "simply decide to exterminate the mass of humanity." Alternatively, if AI is not created, Kaczynski argues that humans "will have been reduced to the status of domestic animals" after sufficient technological progress. Portions of Kaczynski's writings have been included in both Bill Joy's article and in a recent book by Ray Kurzweil. However, Kaczynski not only opposes the Singularity but also supports neo-luddism. Many people oppose the Singularity without opposing present-day technology as Luddites do.Along with Kaczynski, many other anti-civilization theorists, such as John Zerzan and Derrick Jensen, represent the school of anarcho-primitivism or eco-anarchism, which sees the rise of the technological singularity as an orgy of machine control, and a loss of a feral, wild, and uncompromisingly free existence outside of the factory of domestication (civilization). In essence, environmental groups such as the Earth Liberation Front and Earth First! see the singularity as a force to be resisted at all costs. Author and social change strategist James John Bell has written articles for Earth First! as well as mainstream science and technology publications, like The Futurist, providing a cautionary environmentalist perspective on the singularity, including his essays [Exploring The "Singularity"] and [Technotopia and the Death of Nature: Clones, Supercomputers, and Robots]. Also, the publication Green Anarchy, to which Kaczynski and Zerzan are regular contributors, has published articles about resistance to the technological singularity, e.g. [A Singular Rapture], written by MOSH (which is in reference to Kurzweil's M.O.S.H., for "Mostly Original Substrate Human").
Just as Luddites opposed artifacts of the industrial revolution, due to concern for their effects on employment, some opponents of the Singularity are concerned about future employment opportunities. Although Luddite fears about jobs were not realised, given the growth in jobs after the industrial revolution, there was an effect on involuntary employment: a dramatic decrease in child labor and the labors of the overaged. It can be argued that only a drop in voluntary employment should be of concern, not a reduced level of absolute employment (such a position is held by Henry Hazlitt). Economically, a post-Singularity society would likely have more wealth than a pre-Singularity society (via increased knowledge of matter and energy manipulation to meet human needs). One possible post-Singularity future, therefore, is one in which per capita wealth increases dramatically while per capita employment decreases.
Singularity predictions just a by-product of memory compression?
Jürgen Schmidhuber calls the Singularity Omega, referring to Teilhard de Chardin's Omega point (1916). For Omega = 2040 he says the series Omega - 2^n human lifetimes (n<10; one lifetime = 80 years) roughly matches the most important events in human history. But he also questions the validity of such lists, suggesting they just reflect a general rule for "both the individual memory of single humans and the collective memory of entire societies and their history books: constant amounts of memory space get allocated to exponentially larger, adjacent time intervals further and further into the past." He suggests that this may be the reason "why there has never been a shortage of prophets predicting that the end is near - the important events according to one's own view of the past always seem to accelerate exponentially."
Fictional depictions
Fictional depictions of the Singularity usually fall into one of four categories:- AIs and technologically augmented humans (often still inferior to the AIs): Charles Stross, Jacek Dukaj, The Culture of Iain M. Banks, the Deus Ex computer games, the Halo video game series.
- AIs and baseline humans (sometimes referred to as a local Singularity): , The Matrix, Terminator (Skynet), Golem XIV and "" (video game)
- Biologically evolved humans ascending/ed: The Ancients of Stargate SG-1 and Stargate Atlantis, Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri, Shapers in Bruce Sterling's Shaper/Mechanist setting.
- Technologically augmented humans ascending/ed: The Gentle Seduction by Marc Stiegler, Mechanists in Bruce Sterling's Shaper/Mechanist setting.
One of the earliest and best references to technological singularity occurs in the short-short story, "Answer" written by the science fiction writer Fredric Brown in 1954.
Movies and television
One of the earliest examples of smarter-than-human AI in film is '. In the 1969 film, a U.S. defense supercomputer becomes self-aware and unilaterally imposes peace on humanity. The Matrix is set in a world in which AI has dominated and subjugated humans to serve its own ends. In The Terminator, the AI Skynet becomes self-aware and launches nuclear weapons to exterminate humanity. The final scenes of Steven Spielberg's ' take place in what seems to be a post-Singularity future inhabited by posthuman robots but no humans. Odyssey 5 tv series has several plotlines dealing with singularity as well.Anime has also explored Singularity-related themes proposed by Vinge and Kurzweil: Ghost in the Shell takes place in a world in which wetware is nearly ubiquitous and machine consciousness has begun to emerge, while Serial Experiments Lain explores the topic of downloading consciousness. In Bubblegum Crisis Tokyo 2040 AI emerges and gains a powerful ability to alter physical reality.
Accelerating change, transhumanism, and the Singularity are discussed at length by University of Texas chemist Eamonn Healy in the film Waking Life. He describes the acceleration of evolution by breaking it down into "two billion years for life, six million years for the hominid, a hundred-thousand years for mankind as we know it" then describes the acceleration of human cultural evolution as being ten thousand years for agriculture, four hundred years for the scientific revolution, and one hundred fifty years for the industrial revolution. He concludes with the notion that we will eventually create "neohumans" which will usurp humanity's present role in scientific and technological progress and allow the exponential trend of accelerating change to continue past the limits of human ability.
Popular culture
An article in The Economist spoofs projections of technological trends by suggesting that the number of razor blades on disposable safety razors may rise to infinity by 2015 [link].
Organizations and other prominent voices
The Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit research institute for the study and advancement of beneficial AI. They are working to shape what statistician I.J. Good called the "intelligence explosion." They have the additional goal of fostering a broader discussion and understanding of Friendly Artificial Intelligence. They focus on Friendly AI, as they believe strong AI will enhance cognition before human cognition can be enhanced by neurotechnologies or somatic gene therapy. The Institute employs Tyler Emerson as executive director, Carolyn L Burke as director of communications, Allison Taguchi as director of development, AI researcher Eliezer Yudkowsky as a research fellow, Marcello Herreshoff as a research associate, and Michael Wilson as a research associate.The Acceleration Studies Foundation (ASF), an educational nonprofit, was formed to attract broad scientific, technological, business, and social change interest in acceleration and evolutionary development studies. They produce Accelerating Change, an annual conference on multidisciplinary insights in accelerating technological change at Stanford University, and maintain Acceleration Watch [link], an educational site discussing accelerating technological change.
Other prominent voices:
- Robin Hanson has written on the economics of artificial intelligence.
- Bill Hibbard is a scientist at the University of Wisconsin - Madison working on visualization and machine intelligence.
- Mike Lorrey is a prominent Extropian transhumanist, and Libertarian political activist.
- Marvin Minsky is an American scientist in the field of artificial intelligence (AI), co-founder of MIT's AI laboratory, and author of several texts on AI and philosophy.
- Hans Moravec is a permanent resident research professor at the Robotics Institute of Carnegie Mellon University known for his work on robotics, artificial intelligence, and writings on the impact of technology.
- Max More, formerly known as Max T. O'Connor, is a philosopher and futurist who writes, speaks, and consults on advanced decision making and foresight methods for handling the impact of emerging technologies.
Notes
See also
- Clarke's three laws
- Doomsday argument
- End of civilization
- Indefinite lifespan
- Omega point
- Outside Context Problem
- Technological evolution
- Techno-utopianism
- Tipping point
References
- Good, I. J. (1965). "Speculations Concerning the First Ultraintelligent Machine", in Advances in Computers, vol 6, Franz L. Alt and Morris Rubinoff, eds, pp31-88, 1965, Academic Press.
- Ulam, S. (1958). "Tribute to John von Neumann", Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol 64, nr 3, part 2, May 1958, pp1-49.
External links
Essays
- ['Meaning of Life FAQ'] by Eliezer Yudkowsky
- [A Critical Discussion of Vinge's Singularity Concept]
- [Is a singularity just around the corner?] by Robin Hanson
- [Brief History of Intellectual Discussion of Accelerating Change] by John Smart
- [Encouraging a Positive Transcension]
- [Michael Anissimov's Singularity articles]
- [One Half Of A Manifesto] by Jaron Lanier — a critique of "cybernetic totalism"
- [One Half of An Argument] — Kurzweil's response to Lanier
- [A Singular Rapture]
- [Is History Converging? Again?] by Juergen Schmidhuber, with a history timeline based on Omega minus 2^n lifetimes (n=9,8,7, ...), but also suggesting that singularity predictions may be an artifact of human memory compression
Singularity AI projects
- [The Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence]
- [The SSEC Machine Intelligence Project]
- [The Artificial General Intelligence Research Institute]
Portals and
Other links
From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Original article here. Support Wikipedia by contributing or donating.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License See Wikipedia Copyrights for details.
