Opentopia Directory Encyclopedia Tools

Telecom New Zealand

Encyclopedia : T : TE : TEL : Telecom New Zealand


Telecom New Zealand NZX: [TEL] ASX: [TEL] NYSE: [NZT] is a Wellington-based telephone company run as a publicly-traded private company since 1990. It is also New Zealand's second largest mobile operator. Telecom is the largest company by value on the New Zealand Exchange (NZX) and movements in its share price have a great influence on the index of movements in the top 50 companies.

Telecom was formed in 1987 from a division of the New Zealand Post Office and privatised in 1990. The selling price is still considered by many to be extremely low, given that Telecom had a monopoly of all phone lines in New Zealand at the time. Others consider that the capital requirements to modernise the network were better provided by private enterprise than the government.

History

1987

1990

1991

1992

1993

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2004

2005

2006

Telecom Mobile

Telecom Mobile is New Zealand's second-largest mobile operator, with about 49.5% market-share, behind Vodafone. Telecom operates AMPS, Digital D-AMPS/TDMA and CDMA, including EV-DO mobile phone systems in New Zealand. AMPS and D-AMPS service is sold under the 025 brand and CDMA services are sold under the 027 brand. Telecom is set to turn off the 025 network in 2007. Most of its customers have migrated to the 027 network. The 027 CDMA EV-DO network is marketed as T3G, a 2 MB third-generation mobile system.

Customer numbers and market share

The following shows customer numbers and market share information for Telecom Mobile, including both 025 and 027 customers. Since Vodafone New Zealand took over BellSouth in the late 1990s Telecom's market share has dropped every year.

In 2005 Telecom launched New Zealand's first 3G network, using the brand name T3G. Being first into the 3G market, along with aggressive marketing and a $10-a-month text message package, has allowed Telecom to claw back some market share from Vodafone. In November 2005 Telecom reported 72,000 new mobile phone customers, compared to 27,000 for Vodafone.

Quarter No of customers Market share %
December 1999 858,000 68.37%
December 2000 1,150,000 60.43%
December 2001 1,379,000 56.94%
December 2002 1,229,000 50.18%
December 2003 1,298,000 49.95%
March 2005 1,520,000 (approx) 44.6%
November 2005 1,600,000 46%

Recent information shows Telecom to have 1.6 million customers, against Vodafone's 1.9 million.

Criticism

Telecom has been criticised for using its status as a government-protected monopoly to charge high prices whilst providing poor service, [as an example]; on XTRA Jetstream it can cost over $1200 to download 100GB of data in a month, plus monthly access fees (at residential rates, business is more expensive). While there are competitors in the cellular and toll-call markets, it has proved difficult for other companies to establish residential services due to Telecom’s control of local loop services. Telecom has also leveraged its control of residential services to establish the country’s largest ISP, Xtra.

Competitors allege that Telecom engages in unfair practices to prevent competition from arising, and resells broadband capacity to Xtra at lower prices than to other ISPs.

In July 2005, two dozen Internet service providers formally complained to New Zealand's Commerce Commission via a letter. [link] Notably absent from the list of signatories were Telecom’s ISP, Xtra, and several ISPs owned by TelstraClear.

Telecom’s response

In [an article] published on 25 October 2005, Telecom claimed that the reason for poor broadband uptake in New Zealand was because of free local calling. Telecom stated “customers have the option of moving to faster broadband services, but free local calling creates a disincentive by allowing them to use dial-up for as long they want.” However, internet experts disagreed and even the secretary of the OECD [took a shot] at Telecom.

Late 2005, early 2006

Telecom failed to reach their self imposed goal of around 83,333 wholesale broadband customers by the end of 2005. During her opening address to parliament, Prime Minister Helen Clark criticised the state of the internet in New Zealand [link]. This was followed by extensive criticism in the media such as in two high profile television programmes, in two episodes of Campbell Live, during which Teresa Gattung was grilled by the show’s host, and an episode of the New Zealand edition of Sunday. Critical articles have been published by various magazines and newspapers, including the largest newspaper, the New Zealand Herald. Of significance, many of these were lengthy and high profile articles compared to many previous articles critical of Telecom—among the most noticeable of these was published by the National Business Review, in which it was stated that “Far from being ‘Xtraordinary’, as its multimillion dollar advertising would have you believe, Telecom is strangling the nation’s advancement.". While in Wellington for an ICANN meeting, Vint Cerf was reported to have made a personal visit to David Cunliffe, the telecommunications minister where it is believed he recommended that Telecom be unbundled [link] [link]. The New Zealand Government investigated whether it needed to force Telecom to unbundle the network, thereby allowing other companies access and improving broadband service for consumers.

In a decision by the New Zealand Government on May, 3 2006 - Telecom will be forced to unbundle the local loop. This will allow competitors (such as TelstraClear and Ihug) to offer broadband and other communications services throughout New Zealand by installing their own equipment in the exchanges. [link], [link]. The announcement of this decision was rushed as the documents were leaked to Telecom who advised the government of the leak. It was widely reported that the government had intended to make the annoucement during the budget 2006. Most of Telecom's competitors and many independent commentators such as InternetNZ and Paul Budde have applauded the decision. Legislation will have to be introduced to enable the regulatory changes. Three other political parties, New Zealand First [link], the Green Party [link] and United Future [link] all appear to support the decision which would give the government at least 66 votes if there are no votes against the party line.

Following the events of May 2006 the company was hit by a series of other negative news. Firstly, the Commerce Commission announced that it would rule on the contentious issue of mobile telephone termination charges. Then, in early-June, the Commission announced that calls between a landline and a mobile phone within a geographically defined boundary could be connected free of termination charges. The ruling allows Vodafone to establish a mobile phone product which can also provide free local calling, in direct competition with a product for which Telecom has long had a monopoly. Then, the Commerce Commission granted two of Telecom's competitiors, CallPlus and iHug, access to an unrestricted, Unbudled Bitstream Service, which would allow them to provide competitive broadband services.

Finally, the company announced the voluntary separation of its business into two separate entities - Wholesale and Retail [link]

Effects of monopoly

The New Zealand Treasury has estimated the economic loss from Telecom's monopoly to be in the region of $50–$250 million a year. Another study commissioned in 1998 by rival company Clear (now TelstraClear) estimated that the loss was $400 million a year.

External links

 


From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Original article here. Support Wikipedia by contributing or donating.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License See Wikipedia Copyrights for details.

Search Titles
0123456789
ABCDEFGHIJ
KLMNOPQRST
UVWXYZ?

E-mail this article to:

Personal Message: