Urban warfare
Encyclopedia : U : UR : URB : Urban warfare
|
|
|---|
| History of Warfare |
| Eras |
| Prehistoric · Ancient · Medieval · Gunpowder · Industrial · Modern |
| Battlespace |
| Air · Information · Land · Sea · Space |
| Theaters |
| Arctic · Desert · Jungle · Mountain · Urban |
| Weapons |
| Armoured · Artillery · Biological · Cavalry · Chemical · Electronic · Infantry · Mechanized · Nuclear · Psychological · Radiological · Ski · Submarine |
| Tactics |
|
Amphibious · Asymmetric · Attrition · Conventional · Fortification · Guerrilla · Hand to hand · Invasion · Maneuver · Siege · Total · Trench · Unconventional |
| Lists |
| Battles · Civil wars · Commanders · Invasions · Operations · Sieges · Tactics · Wars |
Urban combat is very different from combat in the open at both the operational and tactical level. A complicating factor of urban warfare is the presence of large concentrations of civilians, either innocent bystanders or sometimes as combatants ranging from armed militias and gangs to individuals defending their homes. Tactics are complicated by a three-dimensional environment, limited fields of view and fire because of buildings, enhanced concealment and cover for defenders, below ground infrastructure, and the ease of placement of booby traps and snipers.
Operations
Traditional World War II military operations often relied on large quantities of artillery fire. This was often not possible in urban settings, however. For example, large scale Canadian operations in both Ortona and Groningen avoided the use of artillery altogether to spare civilians.[canadiansoldiers.com]. See also Stacey, C.P. Official History of the Canadian Army in the Second World War Volume III: The Victory Campaign: The Operations in North West Europe 1944-1945 who wrote "In spite of the severe fighting...great crowds of (Dutch) civilians thronged the streets (of Groningen) - - apparently more excited than frightened by the sound of nearby rifle and machine-gun fire. Out of regard for these civilians, the Canadians did not shell or bomb the city, thereby accepting the possibility of delay and additional casualties."
In more recent times, modern armies are bound by law to avoid the indiscriminate use of artillery in cities as a way of reducing civilian casualties. This law has not always been followed, for example the Russian attack on Grozny, in which large amounts of artillery fire were used. The Russian Army handled the issue of civilian casualities by warning that the city would be levelled and that any civilian should leave the city before the attack began.
Fighting in an urban landscape can offer some advantages to a weaker defending force. The attacking army must account for three-dimensions more often than two,[[Citing sources citation needed]] and consequently expend greater amounts of manpower in order to secure a myriad of structures if they don't resort to indiscriminately bombing them. It is also difficult to bomb underground or heavily fortified structures such as bunkers or underground rapid transit tunnels. [[Citing sources citation needed]]
International law also prohibits the use of heavy firepower and indiscriminate bombing in civilian-populated settings. Thus, defenders barricaded in a city will not have to face carpet bombing, heavy artillery and massive tank assault if it faces an army that cares to operate in a legal manner. Even in a situation where the attacker has no such qualms, such as the Imperial Japanese Army during the Second Sino-Japanese War, such actions can spark more resistance and insurgency than there would be without such attacks. [[Citing sources citation needed]] In some circumstances, (for example, using a city as winter lodgements, a supply centre, a leave facility, or utilizing any port and dock facilities), destroying the city would be counter-productive. To deny these advantages to an attacker, defenders may raze cities about to fall as a defensive strategy (historically, this has been known as a component of a "scorched earth policy".)
Tactics
The characteristics of an average city include tall buildings, narrow alleys, sewage tunnels and possibly a subway system. The buildings can provide excellent sniping posts while alleys and rubble-filled streets are ideal for planting booby traps. Defenders can move from one part of the city to another undetected using underground tunnels and spring ambushes. Meanwhile, the attackers tend to become more exposed than the defender as they must use the open streets more often, unfamiliar with the defenders' secret and hidden routes. During a house to house search the attacker is often also exposed on the streets.[[Citing sources citation needed]]Usually, defenders will only use urban warfare as a last resort, and generally try to fight the enemy away from major population centres. Urban warfare threatens the civilian population, industry, and infrastructure, of which the purpose of a defensive army is to generally protect. Urban warfare is generally forced upon the weaker side of a conflict that desperately needs defensibility[[Citing sources citation needed]], risking the destruction if the defensive forces were deployed elsewhere.
Since the 2003 invasion of Iraq most casualties on the side of the United States military there have been in urban or sub-urban settings, despite the fact that the United States forces suffered very few casualties during the initial invasion. This demonstrates the difficulty even the best-equipped armies can face when forced to fight in close quarters.[[Citing sources citation needed]]
The Israeli Defence Forces developed special tactics of MOUT, resulting in very low casualties to the occupying force (about 250 soldiers in 4 years of fighting). These tactics include:
- Non linear advance of forces, swarming the AO (area of operations) from all directions.
- Use of tanks and heavily-protected APCs to mobilize troops and protect them from enemy's fire.
- Use of armored bulldozers to:
- # clear path to friendly forces: both vehicles and infantry.
- # safely detonate booby traps and IEDs.
- # to battle gunmen barricading in rigged buildings.
- # destroy or create ground obstacles.
- Use of superior Close-quarters-combat (CQB) technologies such as advanced red-dot sights, night vision devices, body armor and advanced C4IS systems.
- Use of UAVs to provide intelligence and full battle picture.
- Use of helicopter gunships to target specific threats such as rocket launchers and RPG squads.
- Razing of large swaths of urban areas, thus levelling the battlefield
- Elimination of terrorist leaders and sympathisers before they can engage in urban warfare
Close quarters battle
The term close quarter battle refers to fighting methods within buildings, streets, narrow alleys and other places where visibility and maneuverability are limited.
Both CQB and MOUT are related to urban warfare, but while MOUT refers mainly to the macromanagement factor (i.e. sending troops, using of heavy armoured fighting vehicles, battle management), CQB refers to the micromanagement factor—namely: how a small squad of infantry troops should fight in urban environments and/or inside buildings in order to achieve its goals with minimal casualties.
As a doctrine, CQB concerns topics such as:
- * Weapons and ammunition most suitable for the mission
- * Extra gear, such as bulletproof vests and night vision devices
- * Accurate explosives
- * Routines and drills for engaging the enemy, securing a perimeter, clearing a room, etc.
- * Team maneuvers
- * Methods and tactics
Armies that often engage in urban warfare operations may train most of their infantry in CQB doctrine.
Famous urban battles in modern times
- Easter Rising in Dublin in 1916
- Dublin - Irish Civil War July 1922
- Madrid - Spanish Civil War October 1936 to March 1939
- Shanghai, Republican China, July 1937 to November 1937
- Nanking, Republican China, December 1937
- Siege of Leningrad, USSR, September 1941 to January 1943,
- Ortona, Italy (1943)
- Stalingrad, USSR (1942-1943)
- Warsaw, Poland (Siege of Warsaw 1939, Warsaw Ghetto Uprising 1943, Warsaw Uprising 1944)
- Budapest, Hungary (1945). After a 14-week siege the city fell to Soviet troops. Almost 70% of Buda was destroyed.
- Battle of Groningen, Netherlands, (1945)
- Berlin, Germany (1945)
- Jerusalem (Operation Jevus, April 27, 1948 Israeli capture of Jewish neighbourhoods. Operation Kilshon and Operation Schfifon, May 14, 1948, capture of Jewish sections and sections to create territorial continuity, failed attempt to recapture Old City. Six-Day War of 1967, Israeli capture of East Jerusalem)
- Seoul, Korea (1950-1951)
- Budapest in the Hungarian Revolution of 1956
- Battle of Algiers (1956-1962)
- Huế, Vietnam (1968)
- Saigon (1975)
- Beirut, Lebanon (1980s) see: History of Lebanon and Siege of Beirut by Israeli forces, 1981
- Panama City, Panama (1989)
- Kabul early 1990s, internecine fighting between Afghan factions
- Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina (1992-1995)
- Grozny, Chechnya - First battle of Grozny (1994-1995), Second battle of Grozny October 1999 to February 2000.
- Mogadishu, Somalia (1992-1993)
- Jenin, the West Bank (April 2002)
- Fallujah, Iraq, (2004)(Operation Vigilant Resolve and Operation Phantom Fury)
See also
- Hand to hand combat
- Asymmetric warfare
- Low-intensity operations
- Urban Warrior
- Land Warrior
- Urban guerrilla
- Combatives
- Commando
- Sayeret
- Mouse-holing (tactic)
Footnotes
External links
- [Handbook for Joint Urban Operations]
- [Full Spectrum Warrior (Game simulating MOUT Tactics)]
- [NLF: Urban Warfare Cell]
From Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Original article here. Support Wikipedia by contributing or donating.
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License See Wikipedia Copyrights for details.
